Group class exercises have the potential to provide important lessons for students. However, in completing these exercises, business students may not be getting all of the benefits from group work that a team experience could provide. The challenge to business educators is to provide a meaningful team experience within the limitations presented by the class environment. This article describes organizational communication and marketing classes that applied team formation and team-building exercises to enrich the team experience and differentiate it from typical group work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GatenbyB., Group Dynamics in Practice: A Formal Meeting, The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 55, pp. 24–26, December 1992.
2.
BarkerR. T.Finnemore-BelloM., and HallB., The Use of Overhead Transparencies in Collaborative Business Writing, The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 54, pp. 67–71, December 1991.
3.
ScheiberH. J., Open-Ended Cases and Collaborative Learning in the Business Communication Course, The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 54, pp. 60–65, December 1991.
4.
WilliamsD. L.BeardJ. D., and RymerJ., Team Projects: Achieving Their Full Potential, Journal of Marketing Education, 12, pp. 45–53, 1991.
5.
HenkeJ. W.Jr.LocanderW. B.MentzerJ. T., and NastasG.III, Teaching Techniques for the New Marketing Instructor: Bringing the Business World into the Classroom, Journal of Marketing Education, 9, pp. 20–24, Summer 1988.
6.
DumaineB., The Trouble with Teams, Fortune, 130, pp. 86–92, September 5, 1994.
7.
RobbinsS. P., Training in Interpersonal Skills, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1988.
8.
MaginnM. D., Effective Teamwork, Irwin, New York, 1994.
9.
SomersD. J., Team Building in the Classroom through Rhythm, Journal of Management Education, 17, pp. 263–268, May 1993.
10.
ReddyW. B. and JamisonK., TeamBuilding, NTL Institute for Applied Behavior Science, Alexandria, Virginia, 1988.
11.
McKnightM. R., The Nature of People Skills, Journal of Management Education, 19, May 1995.
12.
DiStefanoJ. J. and HowellJ. M., Multiple Methods for Evaluating Management Skill Development: An Integrated Approach, Journal of Management Education, 14:2, pp. 1–14, 1990.
13.
O'ConnorE. S., People Skills as a Discipline, Pedagogy and a Set of Standard Practices, Journal of Management Education, 17, pp. 218–227, May 1993.
14.
ZengerMusselwhiteHurson, and Perrin, Leading Teams: Mastering the New Role, Irwin, New York, 1994.
15.
BarkerR. T.StoneW., and GilbreathG., The Interdisciplinary Needs of Organizations: Are New Employees Adequately Equipped?Journal of Management Development, Summer 1997, in press.
16.
AchrolR. S., Evolution of the Marketing Organization: New Forms for Turbulent Environments, Journal of Marketing, 55, pp. 77–93, 1991.
17.
SchmuckR. A. and SchmuckP. A., Group Processes in the Classroom (3rd Edition), Brown, Dubuque, Iowa, 1979.
18.
SalasE.DickinsonT. L.ConverseS. A., and TannenbaumS. I., Toward an Understanding of Team Performance and Training, Teams: Their Training and Performance, SwezeyR. W. and SalasE. (eds.), Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1993.
19.
SlaterS. F. and NarverJ. C., Market Orientation and the Learning Organization, Journal of Marketing, 59, pp. 63–74, 1995.
20.
HackmanJ. R., The Design of Work Teams, in Handbook of Organizational Behavior, LorschJ. (ed.), Prentice Hall, New York, 1987.
21.
PearceJ. A. and RavlinE. L., The Design and Activation of Self-Regulating Work Groups, Human Relations, 40, pp. 751–782, 1987.
22.
BarkerS. B. and BarkerR. T., Managing Change in an Interdisciplinary Inpatient Unit: An Action Research Approach, The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 21, pp. 80–91, 1994.
23.
StevensM. J. and CampionM. A., The Knowledge, Skill, and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management, Journal of Management, 20, pp. 503–530, 1994.
24.
CampionM. A.MedskerG. J., and HiggsA. C., Relations between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups, Personnel Psychology, 46, pp. 823–850, 1993.
25.
DyerW. G., Team Building: Issues and Alternatives (2nd Edition), Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1987.
26.
LyonP. R., Accelerating Team Interdependence with a Cooperative Learning Paradigm, Journal of Management Education, 15, pp. 265–267, May 1993.
27.
SchermehornHunt and Osborn, Managing Organizational Behavior (5th Edition), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1994.
28.
BeckhardR., Organizational Development: Strategies and Models, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1969.
29.
TannenbaumS. I.BeardR. L., and SalasE., Team Building and Its Influence on Team Effectiveness: An Examination of Conceptual and Empirical Developments, Issues, Theory, and Research in Industrial Organizational Psychology, KelleyK. (ed.), Elsevier, New York, 1992.
30.
BossR. W., Team Building and the Problem of Regression: The Personnel Management Interview as an Intervention, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19, pp. 67–83, 1983.
31.
BloomB. S. (ed.), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook/Cognitive Domain, David McKay Company, Inc., New York, 1956.
32.
BarkerRandolph T.StoneW., and GilbreathG.The Interdisciplinary Needs of Organizations: Are New Employees Adequately Equipped?Journal of Management Development, Summer 1997, in press.
33.
Beckett-CamarataJ.CamarataM., and BarkerRandolph T.Integrating Internal and External Customer Relationships through Relationship Management: A Strategic Response to a Changing Environment, Journal of Business Research, Summer 1997, in press.
34.
BarkerRandolph T. and HolleyC.Interactive Distance Learning: Perspective and Thoughts, Business Communication Quarterly, 59:4, pp. 88–97, December 1996.
35.
FranzakF. and BarkerRandolph T.Market Orientation, The Team Approach, and Creating the Culture of the Learning Organization, Proceedings of the International Conference of Product Development and Small Business, Bermuda, July 1996.
36.
PittaDennis A.FranzakFrank, and KatsanisLea Prevel, Redefining New Product Development Teams: Learning to Actualize Consumer Contributions, The Journal of Product & Brand Management, 5:6, pp. 48–58, 1996.
37.
PittaDennis and Franzak, Frank, Boundary Spanning Product Development in Consumer Markets: Learning Organization Insights, The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13:5, pp. 66–81, 1996.