Ninety-eight participants aged thirty to eighty-five, drew a self-portrait in which the depiction of face features and limb extremities was studied. Statistical multivariate analysis permitted to describe three classes of drawings with different modes of representation of hands and face features. The representation of the hands was problematic in most of the participants regardless of age. There was a relation between age and not representing the face features: 17 percent of the participants over sixty-five did not represent the face features vs. none of the younger participants. Results are discussed from a psychoanalytic perspective. The difficulties in representing the hands are discussed in relation to castration. The absence of face features in the portraits of some elderly drawers could indicate a minimal age-related defect of the network which establishes that the real mouth and eyes are both symbolic body orifices and imaginary face features. The comments made by some drawers strongly suggest that this absence may also represent an incapacity to face the losses imposed by aging.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsonR.GargM., & AngellJ. (1953). Living dangerously: The effect of chronic pulmonary and renal failure on self-image. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 26, 303–311.
2.
BalboG. (1989). D'un vieillissement outre âge [On aging beyond age]. In BianchiH.GageyJ.MoreigneJ. P.BalboG.PoïvetD. Y., & ThomasL. V. (Eds.), La question du vieillissement. Perspectives psychanalytiques (pp. 74–106). Dunod: Paris.
3.
BergèsJ., & BalboG. (1994). L'enfant et la psychanalyse [The child and psycho-analysis]. Paris: Masson.
4.
CzermakM. (1986). Signification psychanalytique du syndrome de Cotard [The psychoanalytic meaning of Cotard's syndrome]. In ClimsJ. (Ed.), Passions de l'objet (pp. 205–236). Paris: Association Freudienne.
5.
FerreyG. (1992). Le syndrome de Cotard et les négations chez le sujet âgé [The Cotard's syndrome and the negations in the elderly subject]. In Délire des négations. Reprises 1992 (pp. 56–65). Saint Germain en Laye: Editions de l'AARPC.
6.
FreudS. (1988). Formulations sur les deux principes de l'événement psychique [Formulations on the two principles of psychic event], Bulletin de l—Association Freudienne, 27, 19–22 (original work published 1911).
7.
GoodenoughF. (1926). Measurements of intelligence by drawings. Chicago: World Book Co.
8.
GordonA. D. (1981). Classification: Method for the exploratory analysis of multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
GreenacreM. (1984). Theory and application of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press.
11.
GuptaM. A., & SchorkN. J. (1993). Aging-related concerns and body image: Possible future implications for eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 14, 481–486.
12.
HarrisD. B. (1963). Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
13.
HecaenH., & de AjurriaguerraJ. (1952). Méconnaissances et hallucinations corporelles [Alterations in body knowledge and body hallucinations]. Paris: Masson.
14.
HochanadelG., & KaplanE. (1984). Neuropsychology of normal aging. In AlbertM. L. (Ed.), Clinical neurology of aging (pp. 231–244). New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
JonesL. W., & ThomasC. B. (1964). Studies on figure drawings: Structural and graphic characteristics. Psychiatric Quarterly Supplement, 38, 76–110.
16.
KoppitzE. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children's human figure drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton.
17.
LacanJ. (1966a). Le stade du miroir comme formateur de la fonction du Je telle qu'elle nous est révélée dans l'expérience psychanalytique [The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in the psychoanalytical experience]. In Ecrits (pp. 93–100). Paris: Seuil.
18.
LacanJ. (1966b). La signification du phallus [The meaning of phallus]. In Ecrits (pp. 685–695): Paris: Seuil.
19.
LacanJ. (1982). Le symbolique, l'imaginaire et le réel [The symbolic, the imaginary and the real], Bulletin de l—Association Freudienne, 1, 4–13 (original communication 1953).
20.
LakinM. (1956). Certain formal characteristics of human figure drawings by institutionalized aged and by normal children. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 20, 471–474.
21.
LeachM., & FriedJ. (1972). Standard dictionary of folklore, mythology and legend. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
22.
LebartL.MorineauA., & WarwickK. W. (1984). Multivariable descriptive statistical analysis, correspondence analysis and related techniques for large matrices. New York: Wiley.
23.
MachoverK. (1953). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield: C. C. Thomas.
24.
MorinC. (1993). Autoportraits de patients après AVC [Self-portraits of patients after CVA], La Psychanalyse de l—Enfant, 13, 140–157.
25.
MorinC. (1995). La main en rééducation neurologique: réelle, symbolique, imaginaire? [The hand in neurological rehabilitation: real, symbolic, imaginary?], Bulletin de l—Association Freudienne Internationale, 62, 15–19.
26.
PlutchikR.ConteH.WeinerM. B., & TeresiJ. (1978). Studies of body image. IV. Figure drawings in normal and abnormal geriatric and non geriatric groups. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 68–75.
27.
ReinfurtL. (1995). Emotional indicators in the human figure, self-portrait, and self-in-family drawings of 218 first grade children: A comparison. UMI dissertation services Ann Arbor: Bell & Howell.
SeringeP. (1993). La main à travers les langues latine et grecque et quelques racines indo-européennes (I.E.) concernant la main ou les mains droite et gauche [The hand through Latin and Greek languages and some Indo-European (I.E.) roots concerning the right and left hand], In La main (pp. 55–68). Paris: L'Harmattan.
30.
SkaB.DesiletsH., & NespoulousJ. L. (1986). Visuo-constructive performances and aging, Psyenologica Belgica, 26, 125–145.
