A few of the scientists and engineers do most of the publishing of technical papers. However, more people should publish because it is in the best interest of the person, and of his company. The author acquires prestige, and sometimes remuneration. The company contributes to and draws on the vast store of knowledge it can not afford to duplicate on its own.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DudleyB., Communicating the significance of research, IRE Transactions, PGEWS EWS-5, no. 2, December 1962.
2.
FieldsC. W., The staffing and operation of a technical papers support group, IEEE Trans., IWS-8, no. 2, December 1965.
3.
FurlowWilliam, How to write technical articles, and why you'll be glad you did, EDN, Vol. 18, no. 8, p. 60–64, April 20, 1973.
4.
GarfieldE., Communications, engineering and engineers, IEEE Trans., PC-15, no. 3, p. 49, June 1972.
5.
HenneyKeith, Growth and importance of engineering publications, Proc. IRE, p. 1110, May 1962.
6.
KnoxWilliam T., The pathology of information, Tech. Comm., Vol. 19, no. 1, 1st Q. 1972 (reprinted from Book Production Industry, June 1971; Pentor Publishing Co., Cleveland, Ohio).
7.
LufkinJ. M., Generalization and the interpretation of science and technology, IEEE Trans., PC-15, no. 4, October 1972.
8.
SouthworthM. P., Why some technical professionals write—and some don't, IEEE Trans., PC-15, no. 3, September 1972.
9.
Van HaganCharles E., The annual conference—is it worth the effort?Tech. Comm., Vol. 19, no. 2, 2nd Q, 1972.
10.
WalkerMichael J., Characteristics of professional scientific journals, STWP Review, Vol. 12, no. 4, p. 9, October 1965.
