This article considers why users of popular software packages choose to find answers to their task problems on user forums rather than in official documentation. The author concludes that traditional documentation is developed around an antiquated notion of “task,” which leads to restrictive ways of thinking about problems that users encounter and the solutions that might be appropriate. The author argues, instead, that tasks and problems arise from networked rhetorical situations and networked contexts for rhetorical action. The influence of networks requires a redefinition of rhetorical situation and context, from which we derive a networked picture of tasks and problems as emergent and uncertain phenomenon, best addressed in the uncertain and sometimes-chaotic setting of user forums. Forum threads are studied using discourse analytic techniques to determine what they can reveal about qualities making tasks and problems uncertain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HackosJ. T. and RedishJ., User and Task Analysis for Interface Design, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 1998.
2.
MirelB., Dynamic Usability: Designing Usefulness into Systems for Complex Tasks, in Content and Complexity in Information Design in Technical Communication, Routledge, London, pp. 232–262, 2003.
3.
SelberS. A., A Rhetoric of Electronic Instruction Sets, Technical Communication Quarterly, 19: 2, pp. 95–117, 2010.
4.
SpinuzziC., Network: Theorizing Knowledge Work in Telecommunications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.
5.
SpinuzziC., Starter Ecologies Introduction to the Special Issue on Social Software, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23: 3, pp. 251–262, 2009.
6.
JonassenD. H.TessmerM., and HannumW. H., Task Analysis Methods for Instructional Design, Routledge, London, 1999.
7.
Adobe, Using Adobe InDesign CS5 & CS5.5, Adobe, 2011.
8.
Johnson-EilolaJ., Relocating the Value of Work: Technical Communication in a Post-Industrial Age, Technical Communication Quarterly, 5: 3, pp. 245–270, 1996.
9.
FarkasD. K., The Logical and Rhetorical Construction of Procedural Discourse, Technical Communication, 46: 1, pp. 42–54, 1999.
10.
Van Der MeijH.KarremanJ., and SteehouderM., Three Decades of Research and Professional Practice on Printed Software Tutorials for Novices, Technical Communication, 56: 3, pp. 265–292, 2009.
11.
PriceJ. and KormanH., How to Communicate Technical Information: A Handbook of Software and Hardware Documentation, Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston, Massachusetts, 1993.
12.
BitzerL. F., The Rhetorical Situation, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 1: 1, pp. 1–14, 1968.
13.
VatzR. E., The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 6: 3, pp. 154–161, 1973.
14.
SuchmanL. A., Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007.
15.
BarkerT. T., Using Tasks for Analysis and Design in Writing Manuals: A Review. IEEE, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1992.
16.
OramA., Do We Dare to Free Our Computer Users, Technical Communication, 39, pp. 60–66, 1992.
17.
CallonM., Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay, LawJ. (ed.), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1986.
18.
LatourB., Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford University Press, New York, 2005.
19.
LawJ., Objects and Spaces, Theory, Culture & Society, 19: 5–6, pp. 91–105, 2002.
20.
MirelB. and AllmendingerL., Visualizing Complexity: Getting from Here to There in Ill-Defined Problem Landscapes, Information Design Journal, 12: 2, pp. 141–151, 2004.
21.
AlbersM. J., Human-Information Interaction, Association of Computing Machinery, New York, 2008.
22.
TomasiM. D. and MehlenbacherB., Designing Examples-Based Online Support Systems, Technical Communication (Qtr 1) STC, Washington, DC, pp. 55–66, 1999.
23.
HovdeM. R., Creating Procedural Discourse and Knowledge for Software Users: Beyond Translation and Transmission, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24: 2, pp. 164–205, 2010.
24.
NardiB. A.WhittakerS., and SchwarzH., NetWORKers and Their Activity in Intensional Networks, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11: 1, pp. 205–242, 2002.
25.
StarS. L. and RuhlederK., Steps toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces, Information Systems Research, 7: 1, pp. 111–134, 1996.
26.
SlatteryS., Undistributing Work through Writing: How Technical Writers Manage Texts in Complex Information Environments, Technical Communication Quarterly, 16: 3, pp. 311–325, 2007.
27.
SchroederW., Switching between Tools in Complex Applications, Journal of Usability Studies, 3: 4, pp. 173–188, 2008.
28.
BazermanC., Speech Acts, Genres, and Activity Systems: How Texts Organize Activity and People, BazermanC. and PriorP. (eds.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, pp. 309–339, 2004.
29.
DevittA. J., Intertextuality in Tax Accounting: Generic, Referential, and Functional, BazermanC. and ParadisJ. (eds.), Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, p. 336, 1991.
30.
SpinuzziC. and ZachryM., Genre Ecologies: An Open-System Approach to Understanding and Constructing Documentation, ACM Journal of Computer Documentation (JCD), 24: 3, pp. 169–181, 2000.
31.
SwartsJ., Recycled Writing: Assembling Actor Networks from Reusable Content, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24: 2, p. 127, 2010.
32.
LatourB., A Collective of Humans and Non-Humans: Following Daedalus's Labyrinth, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 174–215, 1999.
33.
CastellsM., Informationalism, Networks, and the Network Society: A Theoretical Blueprint, in The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, Edward Elgar, Northampton, Massachusetts, pp. 3–45, 2004.
34.
TerranovaT., Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age (Vol. 23). Pluto Press, London, 2004.
35.
AbbateJ., Inventing the Internet, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000.
36.
GranovetterM., The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78: 6, pp. 1360–1380, 1973.
37.
HaythornthwaiteC., Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media, The Information Society, 18: 5, pp. 385–401, 2002.
38.
SaldanaJ., The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 2009.
39.
GeislerC., Analyzing Streams of Language: Twelve Steps to the Systematic Coding of Text, Talk, and Other Verbal Data, Longman, New York, 2003.
40.
CallonM.LascoumesP., and BartheY., Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2011.
41.
RaineyK. T.TurnerR. K., and DaytonD., Do Curricula in Technical Communication Jibe with Managerial Expectations? A Report about Core Competencies, in Professional Communication Conference, 2005, IPCC 2005, Proceedings, International, 2005, pp. 359–368.
42.
RiceJ., Networked Exchanges, Identity, Writing, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23: 3, p. 294, 2009.
43.
MorainM. and SwartsJ., YouTutorial: A Framework for Assessing Intructional Online Video, Technical Communication Quarterly, 21: 1, 2012.
44.
SwartsJ., Textual Grounding: How People Turn Texts into Tools, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34: 1, 2004.
45.
SwartsJ., Together with Technology: Writing Review, Enculturation, and Technological Mediation, Baywood, Amityville, New York, 2007.
46.
SwartsJ., Information Technologies as Discursive Agents: Methodological Implications for the Empirical Study of Knowledge Work, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 38: 4, 2008.
47.
SwartsJ., Recycled Writing: Assembling Actor Networks from Reusable Content, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24: 2, 2010.
48.
SwartsJ., New Modes of Help: Best Practices for Instructional Video, Technical Communication, 59: 3, 2012.
