While Engineering values direct communication, indirect communication produces a kind of literacy salient for engineers that direct communication may not offer in the way indirect communication does. This article emphasizes the inadequacies of overly emphasizing direct communication for Engineering majors and explains how teaching indirect communication in the form of literature has the potential to cover some of the inadequacies one can encounter if one were to overly emphasize direct communication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FoxC. (2002, Fall). Beyond the “tyranny of the real”: Revisiting Burke's Pentad as research method for professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11(4), 365–388.
2.
FryeN. (1964). The educated imagination. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
3.
KierkegaardS. (1992). Concluding unscientific postscript to philosophical fragments (Vol. 1). HongH. V. & HongE. H. (Trans.). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
4.
KraemerW. G. (2009). The hypnotic literary genre: Poetry, trance, and hypnotext. Ann Arbor, MI: Proquest (UMI Microfilm 3376839).
5.
KynellT. (1996). Writing in a milieu of utility: The move to technical communication in American engineering programs, 1850–1950. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6.
MurphyJ. J. (1990). Roman writing instruction as described by Quintilian. In MurphyJ. J. (Ed.), A short history of writing instruction from ancient Greece to twentieth-century America (pp. 19–76). Davis: Hermagoras.
7.
PolanyiM., & ProschH. (1975). Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
QuintillanusM. F. (1933). The institutio oratoria of Quintilian. (ButlerH. E., Trans.). London, UK: Heinemann.
9.
JosephSister M. (2000). The trivium: The liberal arts of logic grammar, and rhetoric. Understanding the nature and function of language. Philadelphia, PA: Paul Dry.
10.
TaylorJ. L. (1998). Poetic knowledge: The recovery of education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
11.
JeyarajJoseph. Native informants, ethos, and unsituated rhetoric: Some rhetorical issues in postcolonial discourses. Pretexts: Literary and Cultural Studies, 12(1), 2003.
12.
JeyarajJoseph. Liminality and othering: The issue of rhetorical authority in technical discourse in a special issue on theory in the Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20(10), 2004.
13.
JeyarajJoseph. Grammar gurus and essayists in colonial India: A short study on writing practices. The Knowledge Society Journal, 2(2), 2006.
14.
JeyarajJoseph. Technical communication and cross cultural miscommunication: User culture and the outsourcing of writing. In GradyH. & HeyhoeG. (Eds.), Connecting people with technology: Issues in professional communication (pp. 86–97). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
15.
JeyarajJoseph. Modernity and empire: A modest analysis of early colonial writing practices. College Composition and Communication, 60(2), 2009.
16.
JeyarajJoseph. British Indian grammar, writing pedagogies, and writing for the professions: Classical pedagogy in British India. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 2010.
