BazermanC., Systems of Genres and the Enactment of Social Intentions, in Genre and the New Rhetoric, FreedmanA. and MedwayP. (eds.), Peter & Taylor, London, pp. 79–101, 1994.
2.
BrockmannR. J., William Stillman, Rhode Island Mechanician and Communicator—His Lack Patents and Acrostics, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26, pp. 21–35, 1996.
3.
BrockmannR. J., Oliver Evans and His Antebellum Wrestling with Rhetorical Arrangemen, in Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, KynellT. C. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 63–90, 1999.
4.
CoreyJ., Mark Twain—Technical Writer, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 37: 2, p. 108, 1994.
5.
AmareN. E., Professional Communication and Poe's “The Purloined Letter,”IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43, pp. 206–209, 2000.
6.
AdkinsK., Serpents and Sheep: The Harriman Expedition, Alaska, and the Metaphoric Reconstruction of American Wilderness, Technical Communication Quarterly, 12, pp. 423–437, 2003.
7.
WilliamsM. F., Tracing W. E. B. DuBois' “Color Line” in Government Regulations, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36, pp. 141–165, 2006.
8.
BrockmannR. J., Exploding Steamboats, Senate Debates, and Technical Reports: The Convergence of Technology, Politics, and Rhetoric in the Steamboat Bill of 1838, Baywood, Amityville, New York, 2002.
9.
BrockmannR. J., Twisted Rails, Sunken Ships: The Rhetoric of Nineteenth Century Railroad Investigation Reports, 1833–1879, Baywood, Amityville, New York, 2005.
10.
LogesM. L., A Classic Case of Poor Communication: P. G. T. Beauregard's Battle Orders and Report of the First Battle of Bull Run, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25, pp. 261–273, 1995.
11.
LogesM. L., General Burnside and His Orders for the Battle of Fredericksburg: Lessons on How Not to Communicate, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 32, pp. 267–277, 2002.
12.
SutcliffeR. J., Feminizing the Profession: The Government Reports of Flora Anne Steel, Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, pp. 153–173, 1998.
13.
WellsS., Women Write Science: The Case of Hannah Longshore, College English, 58, pp. 176–191, 1996.
14.
WellsS., Out of the Dead House: Nineteenth-Century Women Physicians and the Writing of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, 2001.
15.
SkinnerC., “The Purity of Truth”: Nineteenth-Century American Women Physicians Write about Delicate Topics, Rhetoric Review, 26, pp. 103–119, 2007.
16.
RohanL., Women's Technologies, Women's Literacies: Sewing and Computing across the Years, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 31, pp. 117–134, 2001.
17.
DurackK. T., Observations on Entrepreneurship, Instructional Texts, and Personal Interaction, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 33, pp. 87–110, 2003.
18.
DurackK. T., Patterns for Success: A Lesson in Usable Design for U.S. Patent Records, Technical Communication, 44, pp. 37–51, 1997.
19.
DurackK. T., Instructions as “Inventions”: When the Patent Meets the Purse, in The Historical and Contemporary Struggle for Professional Status (Vol. 1), Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J. (eds.), Baywood, Amityville, New York, pp. 15–37, 2003.
20.
DurackK. T., Authority and Audience-Centered Writing Strategies: Sexism In the 19th-Century Sewing Machine Manuals, Technical Communication, 45, pp. 180–196, 1998.
21.
HenzeB. R., Emergent Genres in Young Disciplines: The Case of Ethnological Science, Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, pp. 393–421, 2004.
22.
HenzeB. R., Scientific Definition in Rhetoric Formations: Race as “Permanent Variety” in James Cowles Prichard's Ethnology, Rhetoric Review, 23, pp. 311–331, 2004.
23.
WynnJ., Alone in the Garden: How Gregor Mendel's Inattention to Audience May Have Affected the Reception of His Theory of Inheritance in “Experiments in Plant Hybridization,”Written Communication, 24, pp. 3–27, 2007.
24.
CampbellJ. A., The Comic Frame and the Rhetoric of Science, Epistemology, and Ethics in Darwin's Origin, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 24, pp. 27–50, 1994.
25.
FahnstockJ., Series Reasoning in Scientific Argument: Incrementum and Gradatio and the Case of Darwin, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 26, pp. 13–40, 1996.
26.
BeerG., Writing Darwin's Islands: England and the Insular Condition, in Inscribing science: Scientific Texts and Materiality of Communication, LenoirT. (ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 119–139, 1998.
27.
ProdgerP., Illustration as Strategy in Charles Darwin's The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, in Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and Materiality of Communication, LenoirT. (ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 140–182, 1998.
28.
Sharon-ZisserS., A Distinction No Longer in Use: Evolutionary Discourse and the Disappearance of the Trope/Figure Binarism, Rhetorica, 11, pp. 321–342, 1993.
29.
BattalioJ. T., The Rhetoric of Science in the Evolution of American Ornithological Discourse, Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, 1998.
30.
BattalioJ. T., Interplay Between Narrative Education and Exposition in an Emerging Science, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26, pp. 177–191, 1996.
31.
DingD. C., Rationality Reborn: Historical Roots of the Passive Voice in Scientific Discourse, in Essays in the Study of Scientific Discourse: Methods, Practice, and Pedagogy, BattalioJ. T. (ed.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 117–135, 1998.
32.
WelchM., The Book of Nature: Natural History in the United States, 1875–1975, Northeastern University Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1998.
33.
HirstR., Herbert Spencer's Philosophy of Style: Conserving Mental Energy, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34, pp. 265–290, 2004.
34.
WalshL., Sins Against Science: The Scientific Media Hoaxes of Poe, Twain, and Others, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 2006.
35.
GatesB. T. and ShreirA. B. (eds.), Natural Eloquence: Women Reinscribe Science, University of Wisconsin Press Madison, Wisconsin, 1997.
36.
LippincottG., Experimenting at Home: Writing for the Nineteenth-Century Domestic Workplace, Technical Communication Quarterly, 6, pp. 365–380, 1997.
37.
LippincottG., Rhetorical Chemistry: Negotiating Gendered Audiences in Nineteenth-Century Nutrition Study, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17, pp. 10–49, 2003.
38.
LippincottG., “Something in Motion and Something to Eat Attract the Crowd”: Cooking with Science in the 1893 World's Fair, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 33, pp. 141–144, 2003.
39.
MageeR. M., Sentimental Ecology: Susan Fenimore Cooper's Rural Hours, in Such News of the Land: U.S. Women Nature Writers, EdwardsT. S. and De WolfeE. A. (eds.), University Press of New England, Hanover, Connecticut, pp 27–36, 2001.
40.
JohnsonR. and PattersonD. (eds.), Susan Fenimore Cooper: New Essays on Rural Hours and Other Works, University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia, 2001.
41.
BazermanC., Electrical Connections: Letters to Thomas Edison in Response to His Claim of Solving Incandescent Lighting, 1878, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8, pp. 135–149, 1994.
42.
GrahamM. B., The Business of Living: Letters from a 19th-Century Landlady, in Narrative and Professional Communication, PerkinsJ. M. and BlyerN. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 181–193, 1999.
43.
DossenaM., Doing Business in Nineteenth-Century Scotland: Expressing Authority, Conveying Stance, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49, pp. 246–253, 2006.
44.
BeamerL., Directness in Chinese Business Correspondence in the Nineteenth Century, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17, pp. 201–237, 2003.
45.
BeamerL., Facework in 19th-Century Chinese Authored Business Letters, Proceedings of the 2003 Association for Business Communication Annual Convention, Association of Business Communication, Chicago, Illinois, 2003.
46.
BeamerL., A Schemata Model for Intercultural Encounter and Case Study: The Emperor and the Savoy, Journal of Business Communication, 32, pp. 141–161, 1995.
47.
BarnumC. M. and HuilinL., Chinese and American Technical Communication: A Cross-Cultural Comparison and Differences, Technical Communication, 53: 2, pp. 143–166, 2006.
48.
DingD. C., The Emergence of Technical Communication in China–Yi Jing (I Ching): The Budding of a Tradition, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17, pp. 319–345, 2003.
49.
LernerN., Drawing to Learn Science: Legacies of Agassiz, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37, pp. 379–394, 2007.
50.
DombroswskiP. M., Ernst Haeckel's Controversial Visual Rhetoric, Technical Communication Quarterly, 12, pp. 303–319, 2003.
51.
Van NoyR., Surveying the Interior: Literary Cartographers and the Sense of Place, University of Nevada Press, Reno, Nevada, 2003.
52.
KimballM. A., London through Rose-Colored Graphics: Visual Rhetoric and Information Graphic Design in Charles Booth's Maps of London Poverty, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36, pp. 353–382, 2006.
53.
BrasseurL., Florence Nightingale's Visual Rhetoric in the Rose Diagrams, Technical Communication Quarterly, 14, pp. 161–182, 2005.
54.
WickliffG. A., Light Writing: Technology, Transfer, and Photography to 1845, Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, pp. 293–3142006.
55.
WickliffG. A., The Daguerreotype and the Rhetoric of Photographic Technology, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12, pp. 413–436, 1998.
56.
WickcliffG. A., Toward a Photographic Rhetoric of Nineteenth-Century Scientific and Technical Texts, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26, pp. 231–272, 1996.
57.
WickliffG. A., Geology, Photography, and Environmental Rhetoric in the American West of 1860–1890, Technical Communication Quarterly, 6, pp. 41–75, 1997. Reprinted in Technical Communication, Deliberative Rhetoric, and Environmental Discourse: Connections and Directions, CoppolaN. W. and KarisB. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 77–112, 2000.
58.
BazermanC., The Language of Edison's Light, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999.
MillerC. R., Learning from History: World War II and the Culture of Technology, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12, pp. 288–315, 1998.
61.
DombrowskiP. M., Ethics and Technical Communication: The Past Quarter Century, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30, pp. 3–29, 2000.
62.
JohnsonR. R., The Unfortunate Human Factor: A Selective History of Human Factors for Technical Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 3, pp. 195–212, 1994.
63.
DicksonB. and BartonE., Leaving Science and Technology for Business and Management: Quality Control as a Discourse on the Move, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 26, pp. 41–63, 1996.
64.
BrockmannR. J., Victor W. Page's Early Twentieth-Century Automotive and Aviation Books: Practical Books for Practical Men, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, pp. 285–305, 1996.
65.
JansenF., Changing Standards in Technical Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26, pp. 357–370, 1996.
66.
BloomL., Science and Writing: Two National Narratives of Failure, in Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and Materiality of Communication, LenoirT. (ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 128–135, 1998.
67.
ZachryM., Constructing Usable Documentation: A Study of Communicative Practices in the Early Uses of Mainframe Computing Industry, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 31, pp. 61–76, 2001.
68.
KimballM. A., Cars, Culture, and Tactical Technical Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, pp. 67–86, 2006.
69.
JohnsonC. S., The Steel Bible: A Case Study of 20th Century Technical Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37, pp. 281–303, 2007.
70.
JohnsonC. S., The Language of Work: Technical Communication at Lukens Steel 1810–1925, Baywood, Amityville, New York, 2008.
71.
DombrowskiP. M., Challenger and the Social Contingency of Meaning: Two Lessons for the Technical Communication Classroom, in Humanistic Aspects of Technical Communication, DombrowskiP. M. (ed.), Baywood, Amityville, New York, pp. 97–109, 1994.
72.
DombrowskiP. M., Challenger Through the Eyes of Feyerabend, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 24, pp. 7–18, 1994.
73.
DombrowskiP. M., Ethics in Technical Communication, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, 2000.
74.
DombrowskiP. M., The Two Shuttle Accident Reports: Context and Culture in Technical Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36, pp. 231–252, 2006.
75.
WalzerA. E. and GrossA., Positivists, Postmodernists, Aristotelians, and the Challenger Disaster, College English, 56, pp. 420–433, 1994.
76.
KynellT., The Student as Translator in the Technical Writing Classroom, Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 20, pp. 145–151, 1993.
77.
GarnerJ. T., It's Not What You Know: A Transactive Memory Analysis of Knowledge Networks at NASA, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36, pp. 329–351, 2006.
78.
SidesC. H. (ed.), Freedom of Information in a Post 9–11 World, Baywood, Amityville, New York, 2006.
79.
McGuireG., Models for Technical Communication, Technical Communication, 40, pp. 354–357, 1993.
80.
BernhardtS. A., The Design of Sexism: The Case of the Army Maintenance Manual, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 35, pp. 217–221, 1992.
81.
RiversW. E., Politics, Ethics, and Corporate Policy: U.S. Corporations' 1986 Position Papers on South Africa, Journal of Business Communication, 37, pp. 369–407, 2000.
82.
SharerW. B., Genre Work: Expertise and Advocacy in the Early Bulletins of the U.S. Woman's Bureau, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 33, pp. 5–32, 2003.
83.
KynellT., Sada A. Harbarger's Contribution to Technical Communication in the 1920s, in Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, KynellT. C. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 91–104, 1999.
84.
HallerC. R., Revaluing Women's Work: Report Writing in the North Carolina Canning Clubs, 1912–1916, Technical Communication Quarterly, 6, pp. 281–297, 1997.
85.
MadausM., Women's Roles in Creating the Fields of Health and Safety Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 6, pp. 261–280, 1997.
86.
LippincottG., Moving Technical Communication in the Post-Industrial Age: Advice from 1910, Technical Communication Quarterly, 12, pp. 321–343, 2003.
87.
CrawleyC. R., From Charts to Glyphs: Rudolf Modley's Contribution to Technical Communication, Technical Communication, 41, pp. 20–25, 1994.
88.
HerringtonT. K., Ethics and Graphic Design: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Document Design of the Report … on David Koresh, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 38: 3, pp. 151–157, 1995.
89.
DingD. C., Influence of Burke and Lessing on the Semiotic Theory of Document Design.: Ideologies of Good Visual Images of Documents, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30, pp. 31–47, 2000.
90.
CarboneM. T., The History and Development of Business Communication Principles: 1776–1916, Journal of Business Communication, 31, pp. 173–193, 1994.
91.
SchryerC. F., The Pedagogical Dissemination of a Genre: The Resume in America Business Discourse Textbooks, 1914–1939, Journal of Advanced Composition, 19, pp. 91–116, 1999.
92.
CowdenK. and SellnowT. C., Issues Advertising as Crisis Communication: Northwest Airlines' Use of Image Restoration Strategies During the 1998 Pilot's Strike, Journal of Business Communication, 39, pp. 193–219, 2002.
93.
JonesS. L., Evolution of Corporate Home Pages: 1996 to 2006, Journal of Business Communication, 44: 3, pp. 236–257, 2007.
94.
ZhuY., Rhetorical Moves in Chinese Sales Genres, 1945 to the Present, Journal of Business Communication, 37, pp. 156–172, 2000.
95.
HarrisR. A., A Note on the Max Plunk Effect, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 28, pp. 85–89, 1998.
96.
LittleJ., Analogy in Science: Where Do We Go From Here?Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 30, pp. 69–92, 2000.
97.
McKaeM. W., The Literature of Science: Perspectives on Popular Scientific Writing, University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia, 1993.
98.
HarmonJ. E., The Uses of Metaphor in Citation Classics from the Scientific Literature, Technical Communication Quarterly, 3, pp. 179–184, 1994.
99.
ThompsonD. K., Arguing for Experimental “Facts” in Science, Written Communication, 10, pp. 106–128, 1993.
100.
LittleJ., Understanding Statistical Significance, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 31, pp. 363–372, 2001.
101.
LittleJ., The Peter Effect in Early Experimental Research, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 33, pp. 41–63, 2003.
102.
FaberB., Popularizing Nanoscience: The Public Rhetoric of Nanotechnology, 1986–1999, Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, pp. 141–169, 2006.
103.
RosnerM., Value in Doing and Writing Science: The Case of Barbara McClintock, Journal of Advanced Composition, 14, pp. 475–494, 1994.
104.
Johnson-SheehanR. D., The Emergence of a Root Metaphor in Modern Physics: Max Plank's “Quantum Metaphor,”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 27, pp. 177–190, 1997.
105.
Johnson-SheehanR. D., Scientific Communication and Metaphors: An Analysis of Einstein's 1905 Special Relativity Paper, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25, pp. 71–83, 1995.
106.
DombrowskiP. M., Plastic Language for Plastic Science: The Rhetoric of Comrade Lysenko, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 31, pp. 293–333, 2001.
107.
ScottH., Stephen Jay Gould and the Rhetoric of Evolutionary Theory, Rhetoric Review, 26, pp. 120–141, 2007.
108.
JournetD., Biological Explanation, Political Ideology, and “Blurred Genres”: A Bakhtinian Reading of the Science Essays of J. B. S. Haldane, Technical Communication Quarterly, 2, pp. 185–204, 1993.
109.
JournetD., The Limits of Narrative in the Construction of Scientific Knowledge: George Gaylord Simpson's The Dechronization of Sam Magruder, in Narrative and Professional Communication, PerkinsJ. M. and BlyerN. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 93–103, 1999.
110.
JournetD., Metaphor, Ambiguity, and Motive in Evolutionary Biology: W. D. Hamilton and the “Gene's” Point of View, Written Communication, 22, pp. 379–420, 2005.
111.
JournetD., Interdisciplinary Discourse and “Boundary Rhetoric”: The Case of S. E. Jelliffe, Written Communication, 10, pp. 510–543, 1993.
112.
CeccarelliL., A Masterpiece in a New Genre: The Rhetorical Negotiation of Two Audiences in Schrödinger's What is Life?Technical Communication Quarterly, 3, pp. 7–17, 1994.
113.
CeccarelliL., Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 2001.
114.
KillingsworthM. J. and PalmerJ. S., A Brief History of the Role of Technical Communication in Developing Environmental Literacy, STC Proceedings, #14387, 1998. http://tc.eserver.org/publisher/STC_Proceedings
115.
PhilipponD. J., Conserving Words: How American Nature Writers Shaped the Environmental Movement, University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia, 2005.
116.
CoppolaN. W. and KarisB. (eds.), Technical Communication, Deliberative Rhetoric, and Environmental Discourse: Connections and Directions, Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, 2000.
117.
CarpenterJ. H., Practicing Our Preaching: Gifford Pinchot, Conservation, and the Scientific Rhetoric of Demonstration Forestry, in Essays in the Study of Scientific Discourse: Methods, Practice, and Pedagogy, BattalioJ. T. (ed.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 105–116, 1998.
118.
BrysonM. A., Nature, Narrative, and the Scientist-Writer: Rachel Carson's and Loren Eiseley's Critique of Science, Technical Communication Quarterly, 12, pp. 369–387, 2003.
119.
WaddelC. (ed.), And No Birds Sing: Rhetorical Analyses of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, 2000.
120.
EdwardsT. S. and De WolfeE. A., Such News of the Land: U.S. Women Nature Writers, University Press of New England, Hanover, 2001.
121.
SeigalM., One Little Fellow Named Ecology: Ecological Rhetoric in Kenneth Burke's Attitudes Towards History, Rhetoric Review, 23, pp. 388–404, 2004.
122.
VickeryB. C., Scientific Communication in History, Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Maryland, 2000.
123.
De PaoloC., Epidemic Disease and Human Understanding: A Historical Analysis of Scientific and Other Writing, McFarland, Jefferson, North Carolina, 2006.
124.
LenoirT., Inscription Practices and Materialities of Communication, in Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and Materiality of Communication, LenoirT. (ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 1–19, 1998.
125.
HarrisR. A. (ed.), Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies, Hermagoras, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1997.
126.
ShirkH. N., Deconstructing Depression: A Historical Study of the Metaphorical Aspects of an Illness, in Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, KynellT. C. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 131–152, 1999.
RyeskyK. H., The Effects of Print and Other Text Media Developments upon the Law in America, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 29, pp. 3–30, 1999.
129.
ConnatserB. B., Two Centuries of Progress in Technical Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37, pp. 129–149, 2007.
130.
LongP. O., Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 2001.
131.
AtkinsonD., Scientific Discourse in Sociohistoric Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1999.
132.
GrossA. G.HarmonJ. E., and ReidyM., Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present, Oxford, New York, 2002.
133.
DingD. C., Rationality Reborn: Historical Roots of the Passive Voice in Scientific Discourse, in Essays in the Study of Scientific Discourse: Methods, Practice, and Pedagogy, BattalioJ. T. (ed.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 117–135, 1998.
134.
DesmondD., Great Natural History Books and Their Creators, British Library, London, 2003.
135.
LefèvreW.RennJ., and SchoepflinU. (eds.), The Power of Images in Early Modern Science, Birkhäuser Verleg, Basel, 2003.
136.
LefèvreW. and FerrisT. L. J., Picturing Machines 1400–1700, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49, pp. 365–367, 2006.
137.
HolmesF. L.RennJ., and RheinburgH. (eds.), Reworking the Bench: Research Notebooks in the History of Science, Kluwer, Boston, Massachusetts, 2003.
138.
WhitburnM. D., Rhetorical Scope and Performance: The Example of Technical Communication, Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, 2000.
139.
LongoB., Spurious Coin: A History of Science, Management, and Technical Writing, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 2000.
140.
RichardsonM. and LiggettS., Power Relations, Technical Writing Theory, and Workplace Writing, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7, pp. 112–137, 1993.
141.
ReinschN. L., Business Communication: Present, Past, and Future, Management Communication, 10, pp. 27–44, 1996.
142.
McDonaldE. E., Tracing the History of Technical Communication from 1850–2000: Plus a Series of Survey Studies, Agricultural Experimental Station, University of Michigan, ERIC ED 478117, 2000.
143.
BrockmannR. J., From Millwrights to Shipwrights to the Twenty-First Century: Explorations or Technical Communication in the United States, Hampton, Cresskill, New Jersey, 1998.
144.
DingD. C., Marxism, Ideology, and Power and Scientific and Technical Writing, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 28, pp. 133–161, 1998.
145.
HyndsP. and MartinW., Artisco Well #5: A Case Study of a Failure in Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions in Professional Communication, 38: 3, pp. 139–145, 1995.
146.
ZoetewayM. W., Teaching the Air Midwest Case: A Stakeholder Approach to Deliberative Technical Rhetoric, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47: 4, pp. 233–243, 2004.
147.
HouseR. W.WaitR. A., and WilliamsJ. M., Teaching Enron: The Rhetoric of Ethics and Whistle-Blowing, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, pp. 244–255, 2004.
148.
CochranM. E., Cynical Politics at Brookhaven National Lab, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, pp. 256–267, 2004.
149.
Nelson-BurnsC., The Davis-Besse Nuclear Plant Eroded Reactor Head, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, pp. 68–280, 2004.
150.
GattisL., Using Criteria in the Recommendation Report: A Case Study of the Texas A&M University Bonfire Commission Findings, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, pp. 281–288, 2004.
151.
StrotherJ. B., Crisis Communication Put to the Test: The Case of Two Airlines on 9/11, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, pp. 290–300, 2004.
152.
KynellT., Writing in the Milieu of Utility: The Move to Technical Communication in American Engineering Programs, 1850–1950 (2nd ed.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, 2000.
153.
KynellT., Technical Communication from 1850–1950: Where have we been, Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, 143–152, 1999. Reprinted in Kynell-HuntT., Technical Communication from 1850–1950: Where Have We Been?, in Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication (Vol. 2), Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J. (eds.), Baywood, Amityville, New York, pp. 11–19, 2003.
154.
RussellD. R., Writing in the Academic Disciplines: A Curricular History (2nd Edition), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, 2002.
155.
RichardsonM., Professional Communication Studies, MLA, and Civic Discourse, Business Communication Quarterly, 66: 3, pp. 105–113, 2003.
156.
Di RenzoA., The Great Instauration: Restoring Professional and Technical Writing to the Humanities, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 32, pp. 45–57, 2002.
KynellT., English as an Engineering Tool: Samuel Chandler Earle and the Tufts Experiment, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25, pp. 85–92, 1995.
159.
MoranM. G., Frank Aydelotte and the Thought Approach to Engineering Writing, Technical Communication Quarterly, 2, pp. 161–175, 1993.
160.
MoranM. G., Frank Aydelotte: AT&T's First Writing Consultan, Journal of Technical WritiSng and Communication, 25, pp. 231–141, 1995.
161.
MoranM. G., Frank Aydelotte and the Oxford Approach to English Studies, 1908–1940, University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, 2006.
162.
MoranM. G., Frank Aydelotte, in Twentieth-Century Rhetorics and Rhetoricians: Critical Studies and Sources, MoranM. G. and BallifM. (eds.), Greenwood Press, Westport, Conneceticut, pp. 1–6, 2000.
163.
RussellR. D., The Ethics of Teaching Ethics in Professional Communication: The Case of Engineering Publicity at MIT in the 1920s, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7, pp. 84–111, 1993.
164.
KynellT., Considering Our Own Pedagogical Past through Textbooks: A Conversation with John M. Lannon, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 24, pp. 49–55, 1994.
165.
HaggeJ., Early Engineering Writing Textbooks and the Anthropological Complexity of Disciplinary Discourse, Written Communication, 12, pp. 439–449, 1995.
166.
WarrenT. J., An Informal Survey of Technical Writing Textbooks, 1950–1970, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26, pp. 155–161, 1996.
167.
KynellT., and MoranM. G. (eds.), Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, 1999.
168.
MoranM. G., Frank Aydelotte and the Oxford Approach to English Studies, 1908–1940, University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, 2007.
169.
MoranM. G., Inventing Virginia: Sir Walter Raleigh and the Rhetoric of Colonization, 1584–1590, Peter Lang, New York, 2007.
170.
MoranM. G., That Far Away Look, Autumn Harbor Press, Atlanta, Georgia, 2009.
171.
MoranM. G. and JournetD. (eds.), Research in Technical Communication, Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, 1986.
172.
TebeauxE., Pillaging the Tombs of Noncanonical Texts: Technical Writing and the Evolution of English Style, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18: 2, pp. 165–197, 2004.
173.
TebeauxE., Technical Writing in English Renaissance Shipwrightery: Breaching the Shoals of Orality, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 28: 1, pp. 3–25, 2007.
174.
TebeauxE., Instructions: The Oldest Form of Technical Writing: From Oral to Textual Instructions in English Estate Management, 1200–1700, Technical Communication Quarterly, 19: 4, pp. 352–378, 2010.
175.
TebeauxE., Safety Warnings in Tractor Operation Manuals, 1920–1980: Manuals and Warnings Don't Always Work, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 40: 1, pp. 3–28, 2010.
176.
TebeauxE., Tractor Operator Manuals: It's Readability That's Missing, Journal of Agricultural Health and Safety, 26: 3, pp. 1–23, 2010.