RiversW., Studies in The History of Business and Technical Writing: A Bibliographic Essay, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8, pp. 6–57, 1994; reprinted in KynellT. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 249–307, 1999.
Johnson-EilolaJ. and SelberS. A., Central Works in Technical Communication, Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.
6.
KynellT. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, 1999.
7.
MaloneE., Historical Studies of Technical Communication in the United States and England: A Fifteen-Year Restrospection and Guide to Resources, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50: 4, pp. 333–353, 2007.
8.
GrossA. G., Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Scientific Sstudies, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, 2006.
9.
KynellT., and SeelyB., Historical Methods for Technical Communication, GurakL. J. and LayM. M. (eds.), Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, 2002.
10.
LockerK.MillerS.RichardsonM.TebeauxE., and YatesJ., Studying the History of Business Communication, Business Communication Quarterly, 59, pp. 109–127, 1996.
11.
ShirkH. N., Researching the History of Technical Communication: Accessing and Analyzing Corporate Archives, STC Proceeding, #13232. http://tc.eserver.org/publisher/STC Proceedings, 2000.
12.
BattalioJ. T., A Methodology for Streamlining of Technical and Scientific Historical Research: The Analysis, IEEE Transactions in Professional Communication, 45, pp. 21–39, 2002.
13.
CampbellJ. A. and ClarkR. K., Revisioning the Origin: Tracing Intentional Agency Through Genetic Inquiry, Technical Communication Quarterly, 14, pp. 287–293, 2005.
14.
DombrowskiP. M. (ed.), Humanistic Aspects of Technical Communication, Baywood, Amityville, New York, 1994.
15.
DombrowskiP. M., Post-Modernism as the Resurgence of Humanism in Technical Communication Studies, Technical Communication Quarterly, 4, 165–185, 1995.
16.
PaulD.CharneyD., and KendallA., Moving Beyond the Moment: Reception Studies in the Rhetoric of Science, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, pp. 372–399, 2001.
17.
DillonW. T., The New Historicism and Studies in the History of Technical Writing, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, pp. 60–73, 1997.
18.
LongoB., An Approach for Applying Cultural Study Theory to Technical Writing Research, Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, pp. 53–73, 1998.
19.
ZachryM., Communicative Practices in the Workplace: A Historical Examination of Genre Development, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30, pp. 57–79, 2000.
20.
LenoirT., Inscription Practices and Materialities of Communication, Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and Materiality of Communication, LenoirT. (ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 1–19, 1998.
21.
StaplesK., Technical Communication from 1950–1998: Where Are We Now?Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, pp. 153–164, 1999.
22.
CharneyD., From Logocentrism to Ethnocentrism: Historical Critiques of Writing Research, Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, pp. 9–32, 1998.
23.
PearsallT. W. and WarrenT. L., The Council for Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication: A Retrospective, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26, pp. 139–144, 1996.
24.
RutkowskiE., Entering the Modern Era, Intercom, 48: 9, p. 6. 2001.
25.
NielanC., A Brief History of STC, Intercom, June, 8–9, 2003.
26.
SandersS. P., Forty, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 40: 1, pp. 1–3, 1997.
27.
CunninghamD. H., The Founding of the ATTW and its Journal, Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, pp. 121–130, 2004.
28.
KynellT., and TebeauxE., The Association of Teachers of Technical Writing: Emergence of a Professional Identity, Technical Communication Quarterly, 18, pp. 107–141, 2009.
29.
DouglasG. H., The Early Days of the Bulletin and the Journal, Business Community Quarterly, 60, pp. 147–154, 1997.
30.
LewisS. D., A Historical Review of Business Communication Quarterly. Business Communication Quarterly, 64, pp. 31–43, 2001.
31.
ReinschN. L., and LewisP. V., Author and Citation Patterns for The Journal of Business Communication. Journal of Business Communication, 30, pp. 435–462, 1993.
32.
LockerK. O., The Role of the Association for Business Communication in Shaping Business Communication as an Academic Discipline, Journal of Business Communication, 35, pp. 14–49, 1998.
33.
AllenJ., Refining a Social Consciousness: Late 20th Century Influences, Effects, and Ongoing Struggles in Technical Communication, in Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, KynellT. C. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 227–248, 1999.
34.
RayE., TECHWR-L: A History and Case Study of a Profession-Specific LISTSERV List, Technical Communication, 43, pp. 334–338, 1996.
35.
Johnson-EilolaJ. S.SelberS. A., and SelfeC. L., Interfacing: Multiple Visions of Computer Use in Technical Communication, in Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, KynellT. C. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 197–226, 1999.
36.
SelfeC. and HawisherG., A Historical Look at Electronic Literacy: Implications for the Education of Technical Communicators, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16, pp. 231–276, 2002.
37.
HitchL. P. and MillerJ. P., Historical Perspectives on Technology, Ethics, and Privacy, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 37: 1, pp. 11–13, 1994.
38.
AlfordE., Thucidides and the Plague in Athens: The Roots of Scientific Writing, Written Communication, 15, pp. 361–383, 1998.
39.
GordonJ., Techne and Technical Communication: Towards a Dialogue, Technical Communication Quarterly, 11, pp. 147–164, 2002.
40.
CampbellC. P., Ethos: Character and Ethics in Technical Writing, IEEE Transactions in Professional Communication, 38: 3, pp. 132–138, 1995.
41.
Di RenzoA., His Master's Voice: Tiro and the Rise of the Roman Secretarial Class, Journal and Technical Writing and Communication, 30, pp. 155–168, 2000.
42.
LongoB., (Re)constructing Arguments: Classical Rhetoric and Roman Engineering Reflected in Vitruvius' De archetectura, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 3, pp. 48–56, 2000.
43.
ToddJ., A Longinian Concept and Methodology for Technical Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, pp. 175–185, 1998.
44.
BlieseJ. R. E., Rhetoric Goes to War: The Doctrine of Ancient and Medieval Military Manuals, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 24, pp. 105–130, 1994.
45.
Di RenzoA., Sortilegio: Cola Rienzi and the Blasphemy of Documentation, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 27, pp. 225–235, 1997.
46.
WebbM. and AlbersM. J., The Design Elements of Medieval Books of Hours, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 31, pp. 353–361, 2001.
47.
WrenD. A., Medieval or Modern? A Scholastic's View of Business Ethics, Circa 1430, Journal of Business Ethics, 28, pp. 109–119, 2000.
48.
LogesM. L., The Treatise of Fishing with an Angle: A Study of a Fifteenth-Century Technical Manual, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 24, pp. 37–48, 1994.
49.
PolakE. J., Medieval and Renaissance Letter Treatises and Form Letters: A Census of Manuscripts Found in Eastern Europe and the Former U.S.S.R. Davis, Medieval Texts and Studies, 38, J. Brill, Leiden, 1993.
50.
WardJ. O., Rhetorical Theory and the Rise and Decline of Dictamen in the Middle Ages and Early Renaissance, Rhetorica, 19, pp. 175–228, 2001.
51.
ThomasM. W., Textual Archeology: Lessons in the History of Business Writing Pedagogy from a Medieval Oxford Scholar, Business Communication Quarterly, 66, pp. 98–105, 2003.
52.
CarmargoM., Where's the Brief?: ArsD octaminis and the Reading/Writing between the Lines, Disputatio, 1, pp. 1–17, 1996.
53.
ThomasM. J., Business Writing in History: What Caused the Dictamen's Demise?Journal of Business Communication, 36, pp. 40–54, 1999.
54.
RichardsonM., The Fading Influence of the Medieval Ars Distaminis in England after 1400, Rhetorica, 19, pp. 105–115, 2001.
55.
RichardsonM., The Gawdy Papers (1509–c.1750) and the History of Professional Writing in England. Journal of Business Communication, 40, pp. 253–265, 2003.
56.
RichardsonM., The Ars Dictaminis, the Formulary, and Medieval Epistolary Practice, Letter-Writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present: Historical and Bibliographic Studies, PosterC. and MitchellL. (eds.), University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, pp. 52–66, 2007.
57.
HendersonJ. P., Valle's Elegentiae and the Humanist Attack on the Ars Dictaminis. Rhetorica, 19, pp. 249–268, 2001.
58.
RichardsonM., Women, Commerce, and Rhetoric, in Medieval England, in Listening to Their Voices: The Rhetorical Activities of Historical Women, WertheimerM. M. (ed.), University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, South Carolina, pp. 133–149, 1997.
59.
RichardsonM., Women Commercial Writers of Late Medieval England, Disputatio, 1, pp. 123–145, 1996.
60.
RichardsonM., Form and Persuasion by Elizabeth Stonor and English Women's Letters, 1399-c.1530, in Women's Letters Across Europe, 1400–1700: Form and Persuasion, CouchmanJ. and CrabbA. (eds.), Ashgate Press, Farnham, Surrey, United Kingdom, pp. 69–102, 2006.
61.
TaavitsainenI. and PahtaP. (eds.), Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval England, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2004.
62.
LongoB., From Secrets to Science: Technical Writing, Utility, and the Hermetic Tradition of Agricola's De re metallica, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 27, pp. 353–359, 1997.
63.
BelfantiC. M., Guilds, Patents, and the Circulation of Technical Knowledge, Technology and Culture, 45, pp. 569–589, 2004.
64.
TebeauxE., The Emergence of a Tradition: Technical Writing in the English Renaissance, 1475–1640, Baywood, Amityville, New York, 1996.
65.
TebeauxE., Technical Writing in Seventeenth-Century England: The Flowering of a Tradition, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 29, pp. 209–253, 1999.
66.
TebeauxE., Visual Texts: Format and the Evolution of English Accounting Texts, 1100–1700, Journal of TeWriting and Communication, 30, pp. 307–341, 2000.
67.
TebeauxE., Pillaging the Tombs of Noncannonical Texts: Technical Writing and the Evolution of English Style, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18, pp. 65–197, 2003.
68.
TebeauxE., Technical Writing in English Renaissance Shipwrightery: Breaching the Shoals of Orality, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 38, pp. 3–25, 2008.
69.
TebeauxE. and LayM. M., The Emergence of The Feminine Voice, 1526–1640: The Earliest Published Books by English Renaissance Women, Journal of Advanced Composition, 15, pp. 53–81, 1999.
70.
TebeauxE., The Voices of English Women Technical Writers, 1641–1700: Imprints in the Evolution of Modern English Prose Style, Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, pp. 125–152, 1998.
71.
TebeauxE., The Emergence of Women Technical Writers in the 17th Century: Changing Voices within a Changing Context, in Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, KynellT. C. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 105–122, 1999.
72.
TebeauxE., Women and Technical Writing, 1475–1700: Technology, Literacy, and Development of a Genre, in Women, Science and Medicine, 1500–1700 and Science. In Honor of the 500th Anniversary of Gresham College, HunterLynettePellingMargaret, and HuttonSarah (eds.), University of Leeds, Sutton, United Kingdom, pp. 29–62, 1997.
73.
TilleryD., The Plain Style in the Seventeenth Century: Gender and the History of Scientific Discourse, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 35, pp. 273–289, 2005.
74.
GowlandA., Rhetorical Structure and Function in The Anatomy of Melancholy. Rhetorica, 19, pp. 1–48, 2001.
75.
SiraisiN. G., Oratory and Rhetoric in Renaissance Medicine, Journal of the History of Ideas, 65, pp. 191–211, 2004.
76.
KlestinecC., A History of Anatomy Theaters in Sixteenth-Century Padua, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 59: 3, pp. 375–412, 2004.
77.
WeberA. S., Women's Early Modern Medical Almanacs in Historical Context, English Literary Renaissance, 33, pp. 358–402, 2003.
78.
BrasseurL. E. and ThompsonT. L., Gendered Ideologies: Culture and Social Contexts for Illustrated Medical Manuals in Renaissance England, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 38, pp. 5–7, 1995.
79.
LayM. M., The Rhetoric of Midwifery: Gender, Knowledge, and Power, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 2000.
80.
MoranM. G., Renaissance Surveying Techniques and the 1590 Hariot-White de Bry Map of Virginia, in Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, KynellT. C. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford Connecticut, pp. 153–172, 1999.
MoranM. G., A Fantasy-Theme Analysis of Arthur Barlowe's 1584 Discourse on Virginia: The First English Commercial Report Written about North America from Direct Experience, Technical Communication Quarterly, 11, pp. 31–59, 2002.
83.
MoranM. G., Ralph Lane's 1586 Discourse on the First Colony: The Renaissance Commercial Report as Apologia, Technical Communication Quarterly, 12, pp. 125–154, 2003.
84.
MoranM. G., Figures of Speech as Persuasive Strategies in Early Commercial Communication: The Use of Dominant Figures in Raleigh's Reports about Virginia in the 1580s, Technical Communication Quarterly, 14, pp. 183–196, 2005.
85.
MoranM. G., Inventing Virginia: Sir Walter Raleigh and the Rhetoric of Colonization, 1584–1590, Peter Lang, New York, 2007.
86.
TolbertJ. T., Seventeenth Century Technical and Persuasive Communication: A Case Study of Nicholas-Claude Fabri De Peiresc's Work on a Method of Determining Terrestrial Longitude, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, pp. 29–52, 2001.
87.
SullivanD. L., Galileo's Apparent Orthodoxy in His Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina, Rhetorica, 12, pp. 237–264, 1994.
88.
HunterM.HunterM. (ed.), Archives of the Scientific Revolution: The Formation and Exchange of Ideas in Seventeenth-Century Europe, Boydell Press, Woodbridge, England, 1998.
89.
RosenburgD., Early Modern Information Overload, Journal of the History of Ideas, 64, pp. 1–10, 2003.
90.
BlairA., Reading Strategies for Coping with Information Qverload ca. 1550–1700, Journal of the History of Ideas, 64, pp. 11–78, 2003.
91.
OglivieB. W., The Many Books of Nature: Renaissance Naturalists and Information Overload, Journal of the History of Ideas, 64, pp. 29–40, 2003.
92.
LundR. D., Writing the History of Business Communication: The Example of Defoe, Journal of Business Communication, 35, pp. 500–520, 1998.
93.
Di RenzoA., The Complete English Tradesman: Daniel Defoe and the Emergence of Business Writing, Journal of Business Writing and Communication, 28, pp. 375–334, 1998.
94.
CurtisL. A., A Rhetorical Approach to the Prose of Daniel Defoe, Rhetorica, 11, pp. 293–319, 1993.
95.
McClishG., Is Manner in Everything, All? Reassessing Chesterfield's Art of Rhetoric, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 28: 2, pp. 5–24, 1998.
96.
de BruynF., Reading Virgil's Georgics as a Scientific Text, English Literary History, 71, pp. 661–689, 2004.
97.
BazermanC., Money Talks: Adam Smith's Rhetorical Project, in Constructing Experience, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, 1994.
98.
HeadrickD., When Information Came of Age: Technologies in the Age of Reason and Revolution, 1700–1850, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2000.
99.
ShapinS., A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1994.
100.
HunterM. (ed.), Robert Boyle Reconsidered, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1994.
101.
HarwoodJ. T., Science Writing and Writing Science: Boyle and Rhetorical Theory, in Robert Boyle Reconsidered, HunterM. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1994.
102.
HunterM., Robert Boyle (1627–91): Scrupulosity and Science, Boydell Press, Woodbridge, England, 2000.
103.
NicholsR., The Diaries of Robert Hooke, the Leonardo of London, 1635–1703, Book Guild, Sussex, England, 1994.
104.
InwoodS., The Man Who Knew Too Much: The Strange and Inventive Life of Robert Hooke, Macmillan, New York, 2002.
105.
O'RourkeS. P.AbbottD. P.CoganM. C.DabeR.SloaneT. O., and ZappenJ. P., The Most Significant Passage on Rhetoric in the Works of Bacon, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 26, pp. 31–55, 1996.
106.
SheehanR. J. and RodeS., On Scientific Narrative: Stories of Light by Newton and Einstein, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13, pp. 336–358, 1999.
107.
MoranM. G., Joseph Priestley, in Eighteenth-Century British and American Rhetorics and Rhetoricians: Critical Studies and Sources, MoranM. G. (ed.), Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut, pp. 175–185, 1994.
108.
Ben-ChainM., How Do Facts Speak for Themselves?: The Doctrine and Practice of Classical Empiricism, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26, pp. 3–19, 1996.
109.
DastonL., The Language of Strange Facts in Early Modern Science, in Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and Materiality of Communication, LenoirT. (ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, pp. 20–38, 1998.
110.
AtkinsonD., Integrating Multiple Analyses in Historical Studies of Scientific Discourse: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975, in Essays in the Study of Scientific Discourse: Methods, Practice, and Pedagogy, BatallioJ. T. (ed.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 139–165, 1998.
111.
AtkinsonD., Scientific Discourse in Sociohistoric Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 1999.
112.
HoustonS. T., S, T. Ball, and M. Houston, Eighteenth-Century Naturalists of Hudson Bay. McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, Canada, 2005.
113.
KnightD., Public Understanding of Science: A History of Communicating Scientific Ideas, Routledge, London, England, 2006.
114.
NateR., “Plain and Vulgarly Express'd”: Margaret Cavendish and the Discourse of the New Science, Rhetorica, 19, pp. 403–417, 2001.
115.
TilleryD., “English them in the easiest manner you can”: Margaret Cavendish on the Discourse and Practice of Natural Philosophy, Rhetoric Review, 26, pp. 268–285, 2007.
116.
ShirkH. N., Contributions to Botany, the Female Science, by Two Eighteenth-Century Women Technical Communicators, Technical Communication Quarterly, 6, pp. 293–312, 1997.
117.
PhilipponD. J., Gender, Genus, and Genre: Women, Science, and Nature Writing in Early America, in Such News of the Land: U.S. Women Nature Writers, EdwardsT. S. and De WolfeE. A. (eds.), University Press of New England, Hanover, Connecticut, pp. 9–26, 2001.
118.
WilliamsW., Religion, Science, and Rhetoric in Revolutionary America: The Case of Dr. Benjamin Rush, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 30, pp. 55–72, 2000.
119.
ToddJ., Teaching the History of Technical Communications: A Lesson with Franklin and Hoover, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 33, pp. 65–71, 2003.
120.
JohnsonC. S., Prediscursive Technical Communication in the Early American Iron Industry, Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, pp. 171–187, 2006.
121.
KynellT. and MoranM. G., eds. Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication. Stamford, CT: Ablex, 1999.
122.
MoranM. G., Frank Aydelotte, and the Oxford Approach to English Studies, 1908–1940. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2007.
123.
MoranM. G., Inventing Virginia: Sir Walter Raleigh and the Rhetoric of Colonization, 1584–1590. New York: Peter Lang, 2007.
124.
MoranM. G., That Far Away Look. Atlanta, GA: Autumn Harbor Press, 2009.
125.
MoranM. G. and JournetD., eds. Research in Technical Communication. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1986.
126.
TebeauxE., The Voices of Renaissance Women and the History of Technical Communication, 1641–1700: Literacy, Roles, and Values, in Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication. Volume 7: ATTW Contemporary Studies in Technical Communication, KynellT. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 105–122, 1998.
127.
TebeauxE., Visual Texts: Format and the Evolution of English Accounting Texts, 1100–1700, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30: 4, pp. 307–341, 2000.
128.
TebeauxE., Renaissance Epistolography and the Origins of Business Communication, 1568–1640: Implications for Modern Pedagogy, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6, pp. 75–98, January 1992.
129.
TebeauxE., Returning to Our Roots: Gaining Power through the Culture of Engagement, Issues of Power, Status, and Legitimacy in Technical Communication, KynellT. and SavageG. (eds.), Baywood, Amityville, New York, Vol. 2, pp. 21–50, 2003.
130.
TebeauxE., Pillaging the Tombs of Noncanonical Texts: Technical Writing and the Evolution of English Style, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18: 2, pp. 165–197, 2004.
131.
TebeauxE., Technical Writing in English Renaissance Shipwrightery: Breaching the Shoals of Orality, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 28: 1, pp. 3–25, 2008.