This case study focuses on images in three Science articles on the ivory-billed woodpecker, whose rediscovery was recently heralded. Because the primary piece of evidence is a frustratingly fuzzy four-second video, two groups of authors ultimately disagree on its interpretation and the same still video images that are used to argue for the sighting are used to argue against it. Given that the authors are making taxonomic arguments, images that closely resemble reality are employed. These images, like all images, are coded, and this analysis seeks to unlock these visual codes to reveal how meaning is made at the site of production, the site of the image, and the site of the audience. It also exposes how meaning making at the site of the image fueled the controversy.
FitzpatrickJ.LammertinkM.LuneauM. D.Jr.GallagherT.HarrisonB.SparlingG.RosenbergK.RohrbaughR.SwarthoutE.WregeP.SwarthoutS.DantzkerM.CharifR.BarksdaleT.RemsenJ. V.Jr.SimonS., and ZollnerD., Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) Persists in Continental North America, Science, 308, pp. 1460–1462, 2005.
6.
PauwelsL. (ed.), Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication, Dartmouth College Press, Hanover, New Hampshire, 2006.
7.
GrossA.HarmonJ., and ReidyM., Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
8.
BattalioJ., The Rhetoric of Science in the Evolution of American Ornithological Discourse, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Stanford, Connecticut, 1998.
9.
BaigrieB. (ed.), Picturing Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Problems Concerning the Use of Art in Science, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1996.
10.
LynchM. and WoolgarS. (Eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990.
11.
BazermanC., Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1998.
12.
RudwickM., The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science 1760–1840, History of Science, 14: 25, pp. 149–195, 1976.
PeirceC., Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs, in Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology, InnisR. (ed.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 1–23, 1985.
15.
KressG. and van LeeuwenT., Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, Routledge, New York, 1996.
16.
FahnestockJ., Verbal and Visual Parallelism, Written Communication, 20: 2, pp. 123–152, 2003.
GrossA., History and Progress of Bird Photography in America, in Contributions to the History of American Ornithology, SterlingK. (ed.), Arno Press, New York, pp. 159–180, 1933/1974.
19.
ReifV. and TornbergR., Using Time-Lapse Digital Video Recording for a Nesting Study of Birds of Prey, European Journal of Wildlife Research, 52: 4, pp. 251–258, 2006.
20.
DastonL. and GalisonP., The Image of Objectivity, Representations, 40, pp. 81–128, 1992.
21.
SibleyD.BevierL.PattenM., and ElphickC., Comment on “Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) Persists in Continental North America,”Science, 17, March 17, 2006, available online at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/311/5767/1555a, accessed May 7, 2006.
22.
FitzpatrickJ.LammertinkM.LuneauM. D.Jr.GallagherT., and RosenbergK., Response to Comment on 'Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) Persists in Continental North America,”Science, 17, March 17, 2006, available online at http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/311/5767/1555b, accessed May 9, 2006.
23.
FiskeJ., Audiencing, in Handbook of Qualitative Methods, DenzinN. K. and LincolnY. S. (eds.), Sage Publications, London, pp. 189–198, 1994.
24.
BastideF., The Iconography of Scientific Texts: Principles of Analysis, MyersG. (trans.), in Representation in Scientific Practice, LynchM. and WoolgarS. (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 187–229, 1990.
