Restricted accessBook reviewFirst published online 2009-7
Book Reviews: Together with Technology: Writing Review,Enculturation and Technological Mediation,Motives for Metaphor in Scientific and Technical Communication,the Global English Style Guide: Writing Clear,Translatable Documentation for a Global Market,Outsourcing Technical Communication: Issues,Policies and Practices
EdgellJ.MeisterG. E., and StampN., Global Sourcing Trends in 2008, Strategic Outsourcing, 1, pp. 173–180, 2008.
5.
DasG., The India Model, Foreign Affairs, 85, pp. 2–16, 2006.
6.
CollierM. J., Intercultural Alliances: Critical Transformation, Sage, New York, 2003.
7.
PanY.ScollonS. W., and ScollonR., Professional Communication in International Settings, Blackwell, Oxford, 2002.
8.
GobyV. P., Business Communication Needs: A Multicultural Perspective, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21, pp. 425–437, 2007.
9.
ReichmanJ. H., The TRIPS Agreement Comes of Age: Conflict or Cooperation with the Developing Countries?, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 32, pp. 441–470, 2000.
10.
McElhinneyS., Exposing the Interests: Decoding the Promise of the Global Knowledge Society, New Media & Society, 7, pp. 748–769, 2005.
11.
TebeauxE., Let's Not Ruin Technical Writing, Too: A Comment on the Essays of Carolyn Miller and Elizabeth Harris, College English, 41, pp. 822–825, 1980.
12.
MillerC. R., A Humanist Rationale for Technical Writing, College English, 40, pp. 610–624, 1979.
13.
FahnestockJ., Accommodating Science: The Rhetorical Life of Scientific Facts, Written Communication, 15, pp. 330–350, 1998.
14.
BhatiaV. K., Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings, Longman, New York, 1993.
15.
KnievelM. L., Technology, Artifacts, Instrumentalism and the Humanist Manifestos: Toward an Integrated Humanistic Profile for Technical Communication, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20, pp. 65–86, 2006.
16.
AskehaveI. and SwalesJ. M., Genre Identification and Communicative Purpose: A Problem and a Possible Solution, Applied Linguistics, 22, pp. 195–212, 2001.