Some struggles for prestige in academic technical communication are self-defeating and wasteful because of the clash between the material (or positive-sum) economy of the workplace and the positional (or zero-sum) economy of the academy. Some professors of technical communication create disrespect for themselves and their specialities because they create degrading representations of working people and their artifacts, they promote impossible standards, and they advance discredited or misleading theories. More profitable approaches to gaining prestige for academic technical communication include recognizing that not everyone can be the top person in the positional economy, studying works on the economics of prestige, and promoting the genuinely good works that already exist in academic technical communication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MillerC., A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing, College English, 40: 6, pp. 610–617, 1979.
2.
SavageG. J., The Process and Prospects for Professionalizing Technical Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 29: 4, pp. 355–381, 1999.
3.
StaplesK., Technical Communication from 1950–1998: Where Are We Now?Technical Communication Quarterly, 8: 2, pp. 153–164, 1999.
4.
MacNealyM. S. and HeatonL. B., Can This Marriage be Saved: Is an English Department a Good Home for Technical Communication?Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 29: 1, pp. 41–64, 1999.
5.
DavisM. T., Shaping the Future of Our Profession, Technical Communication, 48: 2, pp. 139–144, 2001.
6.
Johnson-EilolaJ. and SelberS. A., Sketching a Framework for Graduate Education in Technical Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 10: 4, pp. 403–437, 2001.
7.
FaberB., Professional Identities: What is Professional about Professional Communication?Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16: 3, pp. 306–337, 2002.
8.
MirelB. and SpilkaR. (eds.), Reshaping Technical Communication: New Directions and Challenges for the 21st Century, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 2002.
9.
Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J., Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication: The Historical and Contemporary Struggle for Professional Status (Vol. I), Baywood, Amityville, New York, 2003.
10.
Kynell-HuntT. and SavageG. J., Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication: Strategies for Professional Status (Vol. II), Baywood, Amityville, New York, 2004.
11.
GiammonaB., The Future of Technical Communication: How Innovation, Technology, Information Management, and Other Forces are Shaping the Future of the Profession, Technical Communication, 51: 3, pp. 349–366, 2004.
12.
CunninghamD. H., The Founding of ATTW and its Journal, Technical Communication Quarterly, 12: 1, pp. 121–130, 2004.
13.
GarayM. S., Of Work and English, in Expanding Literacies: English Teaching and the New Workplace, GarayM. S. and BernhardtS. A. (eds.), State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 3–19, 1998.
14.
BlakesleeA. M. and SpilkaR., The State of Research in Technical Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 13: 1, pp. 73–92, 2004.
15.
HirschF., Social Limits to Growth, ToExcel, Lincoln, Nebraska, 1976.
16.
DraggaS. and VossD., Cruel Pies: The Inhumanity of Technical Illustrations, Technical Communication, 48: 3, pp. 265–274, 2001.
17.
LongakerM. G., Back to Basics: An Apology for Economism in Technical Writing Scholarship, Technical Communication Quarterly, 15: 1, pp. 9–29, 2006.
18.
FogelR. W., The Fourth Great Awakening & the Future of Egalitarianism, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2000.
19.
ZakariaF., How Long Will America Lead the World?Newsweek, pp. 40–45, June 12, 2006.
20.
BourdieuP., Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, NiceR. (trans.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984.
21.
NelsonC. and WattS., Academic Keywords: A Devil's Dictionary for Higher Education, Routledge, New York, 1999.
22.
LyonsG., The Higher Illiteracy, University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 1988.
23.
KernanA. B., The Death of Literature, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1990.
24.
ElbowP., Opinion: The Cultures of Literature and Composition: What Could Each Learn from the Other?College English, 64: 5, pp. 533–546, 2002.
25.
ShilsE., The Calling of Education, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1997.
26.
BoothW. C., The Vocation of a Teacher, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988.
27.
ScholesR., The Rise and Fall of English: Reconstituting English as a Discipline, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1998.
28.
GraffG., Clueless in Academe, Yale University Press, New Haven, 2003.
29.
BrantlingerP., Who Killed Shakespeare?Routledge, New York, 2001.
30.
BérubéM., The Employment of English, New York University Press, New York, 1998.
31.
NelsonC., Manifesto of a Tenured Radical, New York University Press, New York, 1997.
32.
NorthS. M., Refiguring the Ph.D. in English Studies, National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, 2000.
33.
HayhoeG. F., Editorial: Back in the Classroom, Technical Communication, 49: 3, pp. 273–274, 2002.
34.
HerdeP., Humanism in Italy, in Dictionary of the History of Ideas (Vol. II), WienerP. P. (ed.), Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, pp. 515–524, 1973.
35.
BurkeM., Correspondence: ‘Cruel Pies,’Technical Communication, 48: 4, pp. 379–380, 2001.
36.
BeldingJ., Correspondence: ‘Half-Baked Pies?’Technical Communication, 49: 1, p. 9, 2002.
37.
SaundersM., Correspondence: ‘Half-Baked Pies?’Technical Communication, 49: 1, p. 9, 2002.
38.
OrdingE., Correspondence: ‘Half-Baked Pies?’Technical Communication, 49: 1, pp. 9–10, 2002.
39.
AshP., Correspondence: ‘Half-Baked Pies?’Technical Communication, 49: 1, p. 10, 2002.
40.
DuBayB., Correspondence: ‘Half-Baked Pies?’Technical Communication, 49: 1, pp. 10–11, 2002.
41.
DraggaS. and VossD., The Authors Respond, Technical Communication, 48: 4, pp. 380–381, 2001.
42.
ChandrasekharS., Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987.
43.
DraggaS. and VossD., The Authors Respond, Technical Communication, 49: 1, pp. 11–12, 2002.
44.
SolomouS. N., Kondratieff Cycle, in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (Vol. 3), EatwellJ.MilgateM., and NewmanP. (eds.), Macmillan, New York, pp. 60–62, 1987.
45.
WarshD., Economic Principals: Masters and Mavericks of Modern Economics, The Free Press, New York, 1993.
46.
SamuelsonP. A. and NordhausW. D., Economics (18th Edition), McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston, Massachusetts, 2005.
47.
McConnellC. R. and BrueS. L., Economics: Principles, Problems, and Policies (15th Edition), McGraw-Hill Irwin, Boston, Massachusetts, 2002.
SalaniéB., Microeconomics of Market Failures, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000.
50.
CowenT. and CramptonE., Market Failure or Success: The New Debate, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom, 2002.
51.
MeinersR. E. and StaafR. J., Property Rights in Academe, in The Academy in Crisis, SommerJohn W. (ed.), Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey, pp. 197–216, 1995.
52.
PrattL. R.ArmstrongP.De NaplesF.MitchellJ. L.MoffatW., and StevensonJ., Report of the ADE ad hoc Committee on Changes in the Structure and Financing of Higher Education, ADE Bulletin, 137, pp. 89–102, 2005.
53.
FriedmanM., Capitalism and Freedom, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982.
54.
AlonsoC. J., Editor's Column: Position Paper, Publications of the Modern Language Association, 117: 2, pp. 201–206, 2002.
55.
FrankR. H., Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behavior and the Quest for Status, Oxford University Press, New York, 1985.
56.
FrankR. H., What Price the Moral High Ground?: Ethical Dilemmas in Competitive Environments, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2004.
57.
SowellT., The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy, Basic Books, New York, 1995.
58.
SowellT., A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles, Basic Books, New York, 2002.
59.
PinkerS., The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, Viking, New York, 2002.
60.
NorthD. C., Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2005.
61.
RhodeD. L., In Pursuit of Knowledge: Scholars, Status, and Academic Culture, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 2006.
62.
MoorePatrick, From Monologue to Dialog to Chorus: The Place of Instrumental Discourse in English Studies and Technical Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36: 4, 2006.
63.
MoorePatrick, Legitimizing Technical Communication in English Departments: Carolyn Miller's ‘Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing,’Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36: 2, 2006.
64.
MoorePatrick and KrethMelinda, From Wordsmith to Communication Strategist: Heresthetic and Political Maneuvering in Technical Communication, Technical Communication, 52: 3, 2005.
65.
MoorePatrick, From Cultural Capitalism to Entrepreneurial Humanism: Understanding and Reevaluating Critical Theory, in Market Matters: Applied Rhetoric Studies and Free Market Competition, CarterL. (ed.), Hampton Press, Cresskill, New Jersey, pp. 53–76, 2005.
66.
MoorePatrick, Questioning the Motives of Technical Communication and Rhetoric: Steven Katz's ‘Ethic of Expediency’Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34: 1–2, 2004.
67.
MoorePatrick, Rethinking the Idea of Profit in Professional Communication and Cultural Capitalism, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18: 2, 2004.
