Say Yes First—To Rural Youth and Family Alcohol/Drug Prevention (SYF) was a 5-year, federally-funded U.S.D.H.H.S. Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) project that involved 859 children in the class of the year 2000. The children in four rural school districts were followed from Grade 4 to Grade 8 from 1991 to 1996. Initial results in a previous publication showed significant lower drug usage in this cohort than comparison students [1]. A follow-up of 120 SYF participants and 136 comparison students in high schools using the National Youth Survey (Follow Up Questionnaire) indicated lower usage of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs for the program students and lower lifetime prevalence of marijuana use for program vs. comparison students. SYF students had higher course grades, lower school absenteeism, more positive attitudes toward school, less trouble in school and less negative self-appraisal. Program students also reported greater participation in sports, more family communication and fewer disagreements or arguments with their parents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ZavelaK. J.BattistichV.DeanB. J.FloresR.BartonR., and DelaneyR. J., Say Yes First: A Longitudinal, School-Based Alcohol and Drug Prevention Project for Rural Youth and Families, Journal of Early Adolescence, 17, pp. 67–96, 1997.
2.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Science-Based Prevention Programs and Principles, 2002, DHHS Publication No. (SMA)03–3764, Rockville, Maryland, 2003.
3.
BlakelyC. H.CoulterJ. B.GardnerS. E., and McColganB. R., Forward: A Call for Findings—Model Programs from the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention's High Risk Youth Program, Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, pp. 6–11, 1996.
4.
Hahn-SmithS., From Science to Practice: Using CSAP Model Programs to Prevent Youth ATOD Use, Prevention Tactics, 4:2, 2000.
5.
BattistichV.SchapsE.WatsonM., and SolomonD., Prevention Effects of the Child Development Project: Early Findings from an Ongoing Multisite Demonstration Trial, Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, pp. 12–35, 1996.
6.
LoSciutoL.RajalaA. K.TownsendT. N., and TaylorA. S., An Outcome Evaluation of Across Ages: An Intergenerational Mentoring Approach to Drug Prevention, Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, pp. 116–129, 1996.
7.
JohnsonK.StraderT.BerbaumM.BryantD.BucholtzG.CollinsD., and NoeT., Reducing Alcohol and Other Drug Use by Strengthening Community, Family, and Youth Resiliency: An Evaluation of the Creating Lasting Connections Program, Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, pp. 36–67, 1996.
SpringerJ. F.HermannJ., and SambranoS., Characteristics of Effective Substance Abuse Prevention Programs for High Risk Youth, Prevention Tactics, 6:3, 8 pp., 2002. Retrieved from http://www.emt.org/publications.html.
10.
SaleE. and SpringerJ. F., Prevention Works!: The Recent National Cross-Site Evaluation of High Risk Youth Programs Reveals the “How” and “Why” of Prevention, Prevention Tactics, 4:3, 8 pp., 2001. Retrieved from: http://www.emt.org/publications.html.
11.
SaleE.SambranoS.SpringerJ. F., and TurnerC. W., Risk Protection, and Substance Use in Adolescents: A Multi-site Model, Journal of Drug Education, 33, pp. 91–105, 2003.
12.
EggertL. and KumpferK. L., Drug Abuse Prevention for At-Risk Individuals, NIDA, Rockville, Maryland, 1997.
13.
WilliamsJ. S., Grouping High Risk Youths for Prevention May Harm More Than Help, NIDA Notes, 17:5, pp. 1–3, 2003.
14.
DishionT. J.McCordJ., and PoulinF., When Interventions Harm: Peer Groups and Problem Behavior, American Psychologist, 54:9, pp. 755–764, 1999.
15.
BarrR. D. and ParrettW. H., Hope At Last for At-Risk Youth, Needham Heights, Massachusetts, Allyn and Bacon, 1995.
16.
ZicklerP., Few Middle Schools Use Proven Prevention Programs, NIDA Notes, 17:6, pp. 1–2, March 2003.
17.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Findings From the High Risk Youth Grants: A Preliminary Report, USDHHS, Rockville, Maryland, 1995.
18.
SchapsE. and BattistichV., Promoting Health Development Through School-Based Prevention: New Approaches, in OSAP Prevention Monograph-8: Preventing Adolescent Drug Use: From Theory to Practice, GoplerudE.N. (ed.), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland, DHHS Publication No. (ADM)91–1725, pp. 127–181, 1991.
American Heart Association National Center, Dance For Heart, Dallas, Texas, 1987.
21.
TelloJ.BarreraR. M.CardenasF.SomyakB. L., and LesterL. E. R., Cara y Corazón [Face and Heart]: A Family-Strengthening, Rebalancing and Community Mobilization Process (Training Guide), Austin, Texas: Corporate Fund For Children, 1994. Available from: Corporate Fund For Children, 1611 West Sixth Street, Austin, TX 78703.
22.
Canek Media Productions, Inc., Padres Con Poder [Parents with Power]: Parent Empowerment Program, [Video Program], Houston, TX, 1994. Available from: Canek Media Productions Inc., 902 S. Allen Genoa, Suite B, South Houston, TX 77587, 1994.
23.
BanduraA., Social Learning Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1977.
24.
MacMillanD. L., Behavior Modification in Education, Macmillan, New York, 1973.
25.
BenardB., Fostering Resiliency in Kids: Protective Factors in the Family, School and Community, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Portland, Oregon, 1991.
26.
BenardB., Prevention from the Inside Out: Tapping Resilience in Youth, Prevention Tactics, 2:3, 8 pp., 1998. Retrieved from: http://emt.org/publications.html.
27.
EMT Associates, National Cross-Site Evaluation of High Risk Youth Programs, Final Technical Report, Chapter 4: Developing Measures, pp. 4. 1–4.32, December 2000.
28.
EMT Associates, National Cross-Site Evaluation of High Risk Youth Programs Final Technical Report, December 2000.
