Cognitive simulations are runnable computer programs for modeling human cognitive activities. Traditionally used to develop expert and learner models for intelligent tutoring systems, building simulations are also effective learning activities in psychology-related courses. Using inexpensive and easy-to-use expert system shells, students can develop simulations of cognitive processes. This article reports a case study where expert systems were used as a formalism for modeling metacognitive processes in a seminar. Building cognitive simulations engages intensive introspection, ownership, and meaning making in learners who build them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlessiS. (2001). Building versus using simulations. In SpectorJ. M.AndersonT. M. (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction, and technology (pp. 175–196). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2.
AndersonJ. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
BarabS. A.BarnettM.Yamagata-LynchL.SquireK.KeatingT. (in press). Using activity theory to understand the contradictions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity.
4.
BarnardP.WilsonM.MacLeanA. (1988). Approximate modeling of cognitive activity with an expert systems: A theory-based strategy for developing an interactive design tool. The Computer Journal, 31:5, 445–456.
5.
GrabingerR. S.WilsonB. G.JonassenD. H. (1990). Designing expert systems for education. New York: Praeger.
6.
JonassenD. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
7.
JonassenD. H.HenningP. (1999). Mental models: Knowledge in the head and knowledge in the world. Educational Technology, 39:3, 37–42.
8.
JonassenD. H.StrobelJ.GottdenkerJ.HongR.Y.HungW. (2002, November). Building cognitive simulations of learning processes using systems dynamics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Dallas, TX.
9.
KierasD. (1985). The why, when, and how of cognitive simulation: A tutorial. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 17:2, 279–285.
10.
KierasD. (1990). The role of cognitive simulation models in the development of advanced training and testing systems. In FredericksonN.GlaserR.LesgoldA.ShaftoM. G. (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
MilradM.SpectorJ. M.DavidsenP. (2002). Model-facilitated learning. In NaiduS. (Ed.), E-learning: Technology and the development of learning and teaching. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
12.
NechesR.LangleyP.KlahrD. (1987). Learning, development, and production systems. In KlahrD.LangleyP.NechesR. (Eds.), Production system models of learning and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
NewellA.SimonH. A. (1972). Human problem-solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
PolsonM. C.RichardsonJ. J. (1988). Foundations of intelligent tutoring systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
RothE. M.WoodsD. D.PeopleH. E. (1988). Cognitive simulation as a tools for cognitive task analysis. Ergonomics, 35:10, 1163–1198.
16.
SolowayE.KrajcikJ.FinkelE. A. (1995, April). The ScienceWare project: Supporting science modeling and inquiry via computational media & technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the America Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
17.
WeinsteinC. E. (1978). Elaboration skills as a learning strategy. In O'NeilH. F. (Ed.), Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press.
