Textbooks describing scientific or technical writing as “impartial” or “objective” are too restrictive. As advances in the history of science have familiarized us with the importance of the human element in science, so the human element must also be given its due in writing in the area. Our students will often be engaged in communication that involves adaptation for an audience relatively unfamiliar with the subject being presented, and they must be aware that the personal touch can arouse interest and sharpen awareness and understanding. History can serve as a source of writing models that successfully use the personal touch.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KuhnT., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (2nd ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1970.
2.
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 3, p. 217, 1973.
3.
le Bovier de FontenelleB., A Plurality of Worlds, trans. GlanvillJ., in The Achievement of Bernard le Bovier de Fontenelle, MarsakL. M., (ed.), 1688, rpt., Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York, 1970.
