This comparative study was designed to investigate how online and traditional face-to-face (FtF) students used different learning styles in a graduate educational course. A nonequivalent control group design was employed. The study involved 19 students in an experimental group (online section) and 25 students in a control group (FtF section) in a graduate course in the Fall semester of 2004. Although no significant statistical differences were detected in learning styles at pretest, significant statistical differences were found in many learning style subscales at posttest between experimental and control groups. Specifically, at the end of the course, online students seemed to have a higher preference for peer interaction, competition, interaction with the instructor, details of the course materials, independence, authority, reading, direct experiences, and clear goal setting than their counterparts in the FtF section. No significant statistical differences were detected in learning performance between both groups. Implications resulted from the study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AragonS. R.JohnsonS. D., & ShaikN. (2000, November). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online vs. face-to-face environments. Paper presented at the World Conference on the WWW and Internet. San Antonio, TX.
BairdD. E., & FisherM. (2005–2006). Neomillennial user experience design strategies: Utilizing social networking media to support “always on” learning styles. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(1), 5–32.
4.
BozionelosN. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLIV: Computer anxiety and learning style. Perception and Motor Skills, 84, 753–754.
5.
BuerkJ. P.MalmstromT., & PeppersE. (2003). Learning environments and learning styles: Non-traditional student enrollment and success in an Internet-based versus a lecture-based computer science course. Learning Environments Research, 6(2), 137–155.
6.
ButlerT. J., & Pinto-ZippG. (2005–2006). Students' learning styles and their preferences for online instructional methods. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(2), 199–221.
7.
CanfieldA. A. (1992). Canfield Learning Styles Inventory Manual.Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
8.
CEO Forum. (2000). The CEO forum: School technology and readiness report [Online]. DC: CEO Forum. Retrieved September 19, 2006 from http://www.ceoforum.org/.
9.
ChingL. S. (1998). The influence of a distance-learning environment on students' field dependence/independence. Journal of Experimental Education, 66(2), 12, 149.
10.
ClarianaR. B. (1997). Considering learning style in computer-assisted learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 66–68.
11.
DaughenbaughR.EnsmingerD.FrederickL., & SurryD. (2002). Does personality type effect online versus in-class course satisfaction? (ERIC Reproduction Service Number ED 464 631).
12.
DiazD. P., & CartnalR. B. (1999). Students' learning styles in two classes: Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching, 47(4), 130–135.
13.
DohertyW. A., & MadduxC. D. (2002). An investigation of methods of instruction and student learning styles in Internet-based community college courses. Computers in the Schools, 19(3–4), 23–32.
14.
DowningK., & ChimT. M. (2004). Reflectors as online extraverts?Educational Studies, 30(3), 265–276.
15.
DrennanJ.KennedyJ., & PisarkiA. (2005). Factors affecting student attitudes toward flexible online learning in management education. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 331–338.
16.
GarlandD. K. (2003). Learning style characteristics of the online student: A study of learning styles, learner engagement, and gender. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 63(12–A), 4282.
17.
GrashaA. F., & Yangarber-HicksN. (2000). Integrating teaching styles and learning styles with instructional technology. College Teaching, 48(1), 2–10.
18.
HalsneA. M., & GattaL. A. (2002, Spring). Online versus traditionally-delivered instruction: A descriptive study of learner characteristics in a community college. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(1), Retrieved September 19, 2006 from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/index.php.
19.
HarrisR. N.DwyerW. O., & LeemingF. C. (2003). Are learning styles relevant in Web-based instruction?Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(1), 13–28.
20.
HonigsfeldA., & SchieringM. (2004). Diverse approaches to the diversity of learning styles in teacher education. Education Psychology, 24(4), 487–507.
21.
JordanovW. (2001). An examination of the relationship between learning styles and technology use.Cincinnati, OH: (ERIC Reproduction Service Number ED 460 150).
22.
JonesE. (1999). A comparison of all Web-based class to a traditional class.Texas: (ERIC Reproduction Service Number ED 432 286).
KellerJ. M., & SuzukiK. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multi-nationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 229–239.
25.
KellyK. L., & SchorgerJ. (2002). Online learning: Personalities, preferences and perceptions. (ERIC Reproduction Service Number ED 470 663).
26.
KeriG. (2002–2003). Traditional and nontraditional students' learning styles: Using Canfield's Learning Style Inventory. Perspectives: The New York Journal of Adult Learning, 1(2), 29–38.
27.
KickulG., & KickulJ. (2006). Closing the gap: Impact of student proactivity and learning goal orientation on e-learning outcomes. International Journal on ELearning, 5(3), 361–372.
28.
KirkwoodA., & PriceL. (2005). Learners and learning in the twenty-first century: What do we know about students' attitudes towards and experiences of information and communication technologies that will help us design courses?Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), 257–274.
29.
KozmaR. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42, 7–19.
30.
LimD. H., & MorrisM. L. (2004–2005). The effect of flexible learning delivery format on online learners' learning, application, and instructional perception. Journal of Education Technology Systems, 33(4), 385–397.
31.
LiuY. (2003). Improving online interactivity and learning: A constructivist approach. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 7(1), 174–178.
32.
LiuY. (2005a). Effects of online instruction vs. traditional instruction on students' learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(3), 57–64, Article 006. Retrieved March 21, 2005, from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Mar_05/article06.htm.
33.
LiuY. (2005b). Impact of online instruction on teachers' learning and attitudes toward technology integration. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(4), Article 007. Retrieved October 27, 2005, from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde20/index.htm.
34.
LiuY. (2006). A comparison study of online versus traditional student evaluation of instruction. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3(3), 15–29, Article 002. Retrieved April 27, 2006, from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/April_06/April_06.pdf.
35.
LiuY., & GintherD. (1999, November 1). Cognitive styles and distance education. The Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 2(3), Article 005. Retrieved October 1, 1999, from http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/liu23.html.
36.
LoJ., & ShuP. (2005). Identification of leaning styles online by observing learners' browsing behaviour through a neural network. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 43–55.
37.
McCollumK. (1997). A professor divides his class in two to test value of online instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education, 43, 23.
38.
MeltonJ. (2003). Learning styles and educational technology: An overview. Languages Issues, 9(1), 61–82.
39.
MupingaD. M.NoraR. T., & YawD. C. (2006). The learning styles, expectations, and needs of online students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185–189.
40.
NavarroP., & ShoemakerJ. (2000). Performance and perceptions of distance learners in cyberspace. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 15–35.
41.
NeuhauserC. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99–113.
42.
PappR. (2001, December). Student learning styles & distance learning. Paper presented at the International Academy for Information Management Annual Conference.
43.
PittmanJ.RutzE., & ElkinsV. (2006). Technology-enabled content in engineering technology and applied science curriculum: Implications for online content development in teacher education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning [Electronic], 5(1), 32–58. Retrieved October 27, 2005, from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDF/5.1.3.pdf.
SabaF. (2000). Research in distance education: A status report. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (Online), 1(1), 1–9. Retrieved October 27, 2005, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/4/24.
46.
SabaF., & ShearerR. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36–56.
47.
SchlosserC. A., & AndersonM. L. (1994). Distance education: A review of the literature.Ames, IA: Iowa Distance Education Alliance, Iowa State University (ERIC Reproduction Service Number ED 382 159).
48.
SchmidtK., & BrownD. (2004). A model to integrate online teaching and learning tools into the classroom. The Journal of Technology Studies, 30(2), 86–92.
49.
SchulmanA. H., & SimsR. L. (1999). Learning in an online format vs. an in-class format: An experimental study. T. H. E. Journal, 26(11), 54–56.
50.
SeilerD. A. (2004). An investigation of online learning and learning styles. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 65(2–A), 479.
51.
SimonsonM.SmaldinoS.AlbrightM., & ZvacekS. (Eds.). (2006). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52.
SmithP. J. (2005). Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3–12.
53.
SmithP., & DillionC. (1999). Comparing distance learning and classroom learning: Conceptual considerations. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 6–23.
54.
TabsE. D. (2003). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000–2001.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
55.
TuckerS. (2001, Winter). Distance education: Better, worse, or as good as traditional education?Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration [Online serial], 4(4). Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/winter44/tucker44.html.
56.
ValentaA.TherriaultD.DieterM., & MrtekR. (2001). Identifying student attitudes and learning styles in distance education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 111–127, 2001. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v5n2/v5n2_valenta.asp.
WaitsT., & LewisL. (2003). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000–2001.U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES Pub 2003–017).
59.
WangK. H.WangT. H.WangW. L., & HuangS. C. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: Enhancing student achievement in Web-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 207–217.
