Individual and Group Problem Solving and Type of Orientation as a Function of High,Moderate and Low Death Anxiety

Abstract

This study utilized a defense mechanism model of death anxiety to investigate the hypothesis of differential individual and group problem solving ability as well as differing types of orientation as a function of High, Moderate and Low Death Anxiety. Results of Experiment I demonstrated significant effects of levels of Death Anxiety on both individual and group problem solving ability. Results of Experiment II partially replicated the results of Experiment I, but failed to demonstrate predicted significant differences between self, task, and interaction orientations within or between low and moderate death anxiety groups. However, significant differences were reported between moderate and high anxiety groups as well as between low and high death anxiety groups. Discussion focused on the partial replication of Experiment I's findings, and upon the usefulness of specific predictions which arise from utilizing the defense mechanism model for death anxiety and its implications for future research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Middleton

W. C.

, Some Reactions Towards Death among College Students, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, pp. 165–173, 1936.

Kastenbaum

, Time and Death in Adolescence, Feifel

(ed.), The Meaning of Death, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959.

Alexander

and Alderstein

, Death and Religion, Feifel

(ed.), The Meaning of Death, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959.

Feifel

, Attitudes Toward Death in Some Normal and Mentally Ill Populations, Feifel

(ed.), The Meaning of Death, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959.

Martin

and Wrightsman

L. S.

, The Relationship Between Religious Behavior and Concern About Death, Journal of Social Psychology, 65, pp. 317–323, 1965.

Swenson

W. M.

, A Study of Death Attitudes in the Gerontic Population and Their Relationship to Certain Measureable Physical and Social Characteristics, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1958.

Farina

A. J.

, A Cross Sectional Assessment of Attitudes Toward a Continuum of Chronological Age, Unpublished master's thesis, American University, 1962.

Handal

P. J.

, The Relationship Between Subjective Life Expectancy, Death Anxiety and General Anxiety, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, pp. 39–42, 1969.

Handal

P. J.

and Rychlak

J. F.

, Curvilinearity Between Dream Content and Death Anxiety and the Relationship of Death Anxiety to Repression-Sensitization, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, pp. 11–16, 1971.

10.

Handal

P. J.

, Relationship Between the Death Anxiety Scale and Repression, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, pp. 675–677, 1975.

11.

Steele

, The Hysteria and Psychasthenia Constructs as an Alternative to Manifest Anxiety and Conflict-Free Ego Functions, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, pp. 79–85, 1969.

12.

Bass

B. M.

, The Orientation Inventory, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., California, 1962.

13.

Livingston

P. B.

and Zimet

C. N.

, Death Anxiety and Authoritarianism and Choice of Specialty in Medical Students, Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 140, pp. 222–230, 1965.

14.

Tolor

and Reznikoff

, Relation Between Insight, Repression-Sensitization, Internal-External Control and Death Anxiety, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, pp. 426–430, 1967.

15.

Zuckerman

, The Development of an Affective Adjective Check List for the Measurement of Anxiety, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, pp. 457–462, 1960.

16.

Gleser

and Ihilevich

, An Objective Instrument for Measuring Defense Mechanisms, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, pp. 51–60, 1969.

17.

Golin

Herron

Takota

, and Reineck

, Factor Analytic Study of the Manifest Anxiety, Extraversion, and Repression-Sensitization Scales, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, pp. 564–569, 1967.

18.

Byrne

, Repression-Sensitization as a Dimension of Personality, Maher

B. A.

(ed.), Progress in Experimental Personality Research, Vol. I, Academic Press, New York, 1964.