The first part of this article shows that research in the history of technical communication has increased in quantity and sophistication over the last 20 years. Scholarship that describes how to teach with that information, however, has not followed, even though teaching the history of the field is a need recognized by several scholars. The article provides and defends four guidelines as a foundation to study ways to incorporate history into classroom lessons: 1) maintain a continued research interest in teaching history; 2) limit to technical rather than scientific discourse; 3) focus on English-language texts; and 4) focus on American texts, authors, and practices. The second part of the essay works within the guidelines to show a lesson that contrasts technical texts by Benjamin Franklin and Herbert Hoover. The lesson can help students see the difference in technical writing before and after the Industrial Revolution, a difference that mirrors their own transition from the university to the workforce.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RiversW. E., Studies in the History of Business and Technical Writing: A Bibliographical Essay, in Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, KynellT. C. and MoranM. G. (eds.), ATTW Contemporary Studies in Technical Communication 7, Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 249–307, 1999.
2.
BrockmannR. J., From Millwrights to Shipwrights to the Twenty-First Century: Explorations in a History of Technical Communication in the United States, Hampton, Cresskill, New Jersey, 1998.
3.
LongoB., Spurious Coin: A History of Science, Management, and Technical Writing, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 2000.
4.
KynellT. C. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Three Key to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, ATTW Contemporary Studies in Technical Communication 7, Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, 1999.
5.
TebeauxE. and KillingsworthM. J., Expanding and Redirecting Historical Research in Technical Writing: In Search of Our Past, Technical Communication Quarterly, 1: 2, pp. 5–32, 1992.
6.
LockerK. O.MillerC. R.RichardsonM.TebeauxE., and YatesJ., Studying the History of Business Communications, Business Communication Quarterly, 59: 2, pp. 109–127, 1996.
7.
ConnorJ. J., Medical Text and Historical Context: Research Issues and Methods in History and Technical Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 23: 3, pp. 211–232, 1993.
8.
DillonW. T., The New Historicism and Studies in the History of Business and Technical Writing, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, pp. 60–73, 1997, Ovid, 03115598.
9.
AdamsK. H., A History of Professional Writing Instruction in American Colleges: Years of Acceptance, Growth, and Doubt, Southern Methodist University Press, Dallas, Texas, 1993.
10.
KynellT. C., Writing in a Milieu of Utility: The Move to Technical Communication in American Engineering Programs 1850–1950, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey, 1996.
11.
TebeauxE., The Emergence of a Tradition: Technical Writing in the English Renaissance, 1475–1640, Baywood's Technical Communication Series, Baywood, Amityville, New York, 1997.
12.
YatesJ., Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1989.
13.
GreshamS., From Aristotle to Einstein: Scientific Literature and the Teaching of Technical Writing, in Courses, Components, and Exercises in Technical Communication, StevensonDwight W. (ed.), NCTE, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 87–93, 1981.
14.
GreshamS. L., When Technical Communicators Face the Past, Technical Communication, 25: 3, pp. 8–11, 1978.
15.
RichardsonM. and LiggettS., Power Relations, Technical Writing Theory, and Workplace Writing, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7, pp. 112–137, 1993.
16.
TebeauxE., The Voices of English Women Technical Writers, 1641–1700: Imprints in the Evolution of Modern English Prose Style, Technical Communication Quarterly, 7: 2, pp. 125–152, 1998.
17.
SauerB. A., Revisioning Sixteenth Century Solutions to Twentieth Century Problems in Herbert Hoover's Translation of Agricola's De Re Metallica, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 23, pp. 269–286, 1993.
18.
StaplesK. and OrnatowskiC. (eds.), Foundations for Teaching Technical Communication: Theory, Practice, and Program Design, ATTW Contemporary Studies in Technical Communication 1, Ablex, Greenwich, Connecticut, 1997.
19.
MillerW. J., What Can the Technical Writer of the Past Teach the Technical Writer of Today?, in The Teaching of Technical Writing, CunninghamD. H. and EstrinH. A. (eds.), NCTE, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 198–216, 1975. Reprinted from IRE Transactions on Engineering Writing and Speech, EWS-4:3, pp. 69–76, 1961.
20.
RutterR., History, Rhetoric, and Humanism: Toward a Comprehensive Definition of Technical Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 21, pp. 133–153, 1991.
21.
MasseR. E. and KelleyP. M., Teaching the Tradition of Technical and Scientific Writing, in Technical and Professional Communication, SawyerT. M. (ed.), Professional Communication, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 79–87, 1977.
22.
AllenJ., The Literature of Science and the Technical Writing Curriculum, Proceedings of the 31st International Technical Communication Conference, Society for Technical Communication, Washington, D.C., pp. RET 70–72, 1984.
23.
JonesD. R., A Rhetorical Approach for Teaching the Literature of Scientific and Technical Writing, Technical Writing Teacher, 7: 2, pp. 115–125, 1985.
24.
WahlstromB., Designing a Research Program in Scientific and Technical Communication: Setting Standards and Defining the Agenda, in Foundations for Teaching Technical Communication: Theory, Practice, and Program Design, StaplesK. and OrnatowskiC. (eds.), ATTW Contemporary Studies in Technical Communication 1, Ablex, Greenwich, Connecticut, pp. 299–315, 1997.
25.
WinsorD. A., Rhetorical Practices in Technical Work, Journal of Business and Technical Writing12, pp. 343–370, 1998, Ovid, 03819769.
26.
MillerC. R., Learning from History: World War II and the Culture of High Technology, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12, pp. 288–315, 1998, Ovid, 03819767.
27.
BrockmannR. J., William Stillman, Rhode Island Mechanician and Communicator—His Lock Patents and Acrostics, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26: 1, pp. 21–35, 1996.
28.
HooverH., The Principles of Mining: Valuation, Organization and Administration: Copper, Gold, Lead, Silver, Tin and Zinc, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1909.
29.
LogesM., A Classical Case of Poor Communication: P. G. T. Beauregard's Battle Orders and Report of the First Battle of Bull Run, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25: 3, pp. 261–273, 1995.
30.
BrockmannR. J., Victor W. Page's Early Twentieth-Century Automotive and Aviation Books: “Practical Books for Practical Men,”, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, pp. 285–305, 1996.
31.
MoranM. G., Frank Aydelotte: AT&T's First Writing Consultant, 1917–1918, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25: 3, pp. 231–241, 1995.
32.
CochranT. C. and MillerW., The Age of Enterprise: A Social History of Industrial America (Revised ed.), Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1964.
33.
JohnsonP., A History of the American People, HarperPerennial, New York, 1999.
34.
FranklinB., An Account of the New-Invented Pennsylvanian Fire-Places, in The Works of Benjamin Franklin; Containing Several Political and Historical Tracts Not Included in Any Former Edition, and Many Letters Official and Private Not Hitherto Published; with Notes and a Life of the Author, SparksJ. (ed.), Hilliard, Gray, Boston, Massachusetts, Vol. VI, pp. 34–64, 1840.
35.
BurkeK., Attitudes toward History (3rd ed.), Berkeley, California, University of California Press, 1984.
36.
RichardsonM., Corporate Power, Corporate Rhetoric, and the Workplace Writer, in Studies in Technical Communication: Proceedings of the 1993 CCCC and NCTE Meetings, SimsBrenda R. (ed.), pp. 69–79, 1993.
37.
ToddJeff, Burkean Invention in Technical Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30: 1, 2000.
38.
ToddJeff, A Longinian Concept and Methodology for Technical Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, 7: 2, 1998.
