A contextual age construct was developed and examined as a transactional, life-position index of aging. The eighteen-item contextual age index included six interrelated dimensions: physical health, interpersonal interaction, mobility, life satisfaction, social activity, and economic security. In addition to the development of the index, associations among contextual age and sociodemographic characteristics were examined for a sample of 640 persons. Chronological age was correlated negatively with mobility and physical health, and positively with economic security, life satisfaction, and interpersonal interaction. Mobility, economic security, life satisfaction, physical health, and interpersonal interaction discriminated between chronological age groups. Interpersonal interaction, economic security, physical health, and social activity were predictors of life satisfaction. The contextual age construct raises questions concerning several negative myths about aging. The findings reflect the weak validity of chronological age as a unidimensional indicator of life-position and well-being.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KalugerG. and KalugerM. F., Human Development (2nd edition), Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri, 1979.
2.
CavanR. S.BurgessE. W.HavighurstR. J., and GoldhamerH., Personal Adjustment in Old Age, Science Research Associates, Chicago, Illinois, 1949.
3.
HavighurstR. J. and AlbrechtR., Older People, Longmans, Green, New York, 1953.
4.
CummingE., Further Thoughts on the Theory of Disengagement, International Social Science Journal, 3, pp. 377–393, 1963.
5.
CummingE. and HenryW. E., Growing Old: The Process of Disengagement, Basic Books, New York, 1961.
6.
DowdJ. J., Aging as Exchange: A Preface to Theory, Journal of Gerontology, 30, pp. 584–594, 1975.
7.
LemonB. W.GengtsonV. L., and PetersonJ. A., An Exploration of the Activity Theory of Aging: Activity Types and Life Satisfaction among In-Movers to a Retirement Community, Journal of Gerontology, 27, pp. 511–523, 1972.
8.
KnappM. R., The Activity Theory of Aging, The Gerontologist, 17, pp. 553–559, 1977.
9.
GubriumJ. J., The Myth of the Golden Years: A Socio-Environmental Theory of Aging, Charles Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1973.
10.
CampbellA.ConverseP. E., and RodgersW. L., The Quality of American Life, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1976.
11.
GeorgeL. K. and BearonL. B., Quality of Life in Older Persons, Human Sciences Press, New York, 1980.
12.
HavighurstR. J.NeugartenR. J., and TobinS. S., Disengagement and Patterns of Aging, in Middle Age and Aging, NeugartenB. L. (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1968.
13.
MaddoxG. L., Fact and Artifact: Evidence Bearing on Disengagement Theory from the Duke Geriatrics Project, Human Development, 8, pp. 117–130, 1965.
14.
MaddoxG. L. and EisdorferC., Some Correlates of Activity and Morale among the Elderly, Social Forces, 40, pp. 254–260, 1962.
15.
KutnerB.FanshelD.TogoA. M., and LangnerT. S., Five Hundred Over Sixty, Russel Sage Foundation, New York, 1956.
16.
GraneyM. J. and ZimmermanR. M., Health Self-Report Correlates among Older People in Natural Random Sample Data, Mid-American Review of Sociology, 5, pp. 47–59, 1980.
17.
ManciniJ. A.QuinnW.GaviganM. A., and FranklinH., Social Network Interaction among Older Adults: Implications for Life Satisfaction, Human Relations, 33, pp. 534–554, 1980.
18.
DuffR. W. and HongL. K., Quality and Quantity of Social Interactions in the Life Satisfaction of Older Americans, Sociology and Social Research, 66, pp. 418–434, 1982.
19.
TeschS.WhitbourneS. K., and NehrkeM. F., Friendship, Social Interaction and Subjective Well-Being of Older Men in an Institutional Setting, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 13, pp. 317–327, 1981.
20.
FlyJ. W.ReinhartC. R., and HambryR., Leisure Activity and Adjustment in Retirement, Sociological Spectrum, 1, pp. 135–144, 1981.
21.
DowdJ. J., Stratification among the Aged, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, California, 1980.
22.
BellB. D., Role Set Orientations and Life Satisfaction: A New Look at an Old Theory, in Time, Roles and Self in Old Age, GubriumJ. F. (ed.), Human Sciences Press, New York, 1976.
23.
SchwartzA., A Transactional View of the Aging Process, in Professional Obligations and Approaches to the Aged, SchwartzA. and MenshI. (eds.), Charles Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1974.
24.
GraneyM. J. and GraneyE. E., Communications Activity Substitutions in Aging, Journal of Communication, 24:4, pp. 88–96, 1974.
25.
HurlockE. B., Developmental Psychology (3rd edition), McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
26.
PfeifferE., Psychopathology and Social Pathology, in Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, BirrenJ. E. and SchaieK. W. (eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1977.
27.
SwankC., Media Uses and Gratifications: Need Salience and Source Dependence in a Sample of the Elderly, American Behavioral Scientist, 23, pp. 95–117, 1979.
28.
RubinA. M. and RubinR. B., Age, Context and Television Use, Journal of Broadcasting, 25, pp. 1–13, 1981.
29.
RubinA. M. and RubinR. B., Contextual Age and Television Use, Human Communication Research, 8, pp. 228–244, 1982.
30.
RubinR. B. and RubinA. M., Contextual Age and Television Use: Reexamining a Life-Position Indicator, in Communication Yearbook 6, BurgoonM. (ed.), Sage, Beverly Hills, California, 1982.
31.
BlalockH. M.Jr., Social Statistics (2nd edition), McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.
32.
HavighurstR. J., The Future Aged: The Use of Time and Money, The Gerontologist, 15, pp. 10–15, 1975.
33.
KleckaW. R., Discriminant Analysis, Sage, Beverly Hills, California, 1980.
34.
NieN. H.HullC. H.JenkinsJ. G.SteinbrennerK., and BentD. H., Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (2nd edition), McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975.
35.
HullC. H. and NieN. H., SPSS Update 7–9, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981.
36.
HendricksJ. and HendricksC. D., Aging in Mass Society: Myths and Realities, Winthrop, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1977.
