Evidence is frequently cited that purports to show that drug education has been counterproductive. A review is made of all available (i.e. fifteen) studies reporting “negative” effects of such programs. Results, while not numerous, show both negative attitudinal and behavioral effects, usually in combination with other positive program effects. Discussion of the findings include both program and research implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LevyR. M. and BrownA. R., Untoward Effects of Drug Education, American Journal of Public Health, 63, pp. 1071–1073, 1973.
2.
StickgoldA. and BrovarA., Undesirable Sequelae of Drug Abuse Education, Contemporary Drug Problems, 7, pp. 99–115, 1978.
3.
SchapsE.DiBartoloR.PalleyC. S. and ChurginS., Primary Prevention Evaluation Research: A Review of 127 Program Evaluations, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Walnut Creek, California, 1978.
4.
Macro Systems, Inc., Evaluation of Drug Education Programs, Macro Systems, Inc., Silver Spring, Maryland, 1972.
5.
CookR. F.MortonA. S. and LittleA. D., An Assessment of Drug Education—Prevention Programs in the U.S. Army, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Technical Paper 261, 1975.
6.
DemboR., Drug Abuse Prevention: The Awareness, Experience, and Opinions of Junior and Senior High School Students in New York State, Report No. 2 of Winter 1974/75 Survey, New York State Office of Drug Abuse Services, Bureau of Social Science Research and Program Evaluation, 1976.
7.
GoodstadtM. S.SheppardM. A.KijewskiK., and ChungL., The Status of Drug Education in Ontario: 1977, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, 1978.
8.
California State Department of Education, A Study of More Effective Education Relative to Narcotics, Other Harmful Drugs and Hallucinogenic Substances, A Progress Report, Submitted to the California Legislature, 1970.
9.
SwiftB.DornN. and ThompsonA., Evaluation of Drug Education: Findings of a National Research Study on Secondary School Students of Five Types of Lessons Given by Teachers, Institute for the Study of Drug Dependence, London, 1974.
10.
BerberianR. M., The Relationship Between Drug Education Programs in the Greater New Haven Schools and Changes in Drug Use and Drug-Related Beliefs and Perceptions, Health Education Monographs, 4, pp. 327–376, 1976.
11.
TennantF. S.Jr.WeaverS. C. and LewisC. E., Outcomes of Drug Education: Four Case Studies, Pediatrics, 52, pp. 246–251, 1973.
12.
GoodstadtM., Myths and Methodology in Drug Education. A Critical Review of the Research Evidence, GoodstadtM. S., (ed.), Research on Methods and Programs of Drug Education, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, 1974.
13.
BlumR. H., Drug Education: Results and Recommendations, D. C. Heath and Co., Lexington, Mass., 1976.
14.
BlumR. H.GarfieldE. F.JohnstoneJ. L. and MagistadJ. G., Drug Education: Further Results and Recommendations, Journal of Drug Issues, 8, pp. 379–426, 1978.
15.
CarneyR. E., An Evaluation of the Effect of a Values-Oriented Drug Abuse Education Program Using the Risk Taking Attitude Questionnaire, Coronado Unified School District, Coronado, California, 1971.
16.
CarneyR. E., Final 1972–1973 Report on the Use of the RTA VI to Evaluate the Effects of a Values-Oriented Drug Abuse Prevention Program in the Tempe, Arizona Schools, Educators Assistance Institute, Santa Monica, California, 1975.
17.
D'AugelliJ. F., Brief Report: Initial Evaluation of a Televised Affective Education Program as a Primary Prevention Strategy, Pennsylvania State University, Addictions Prevention Laboratory, 1974.
18.
GoodstadtM. S.SheppardM. A. and CrawfordS. H., Development and Evaluation of Two Alcohol Education Programs for the Toronto Board of Education, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Substudy #941, 1978.
19.
GoodstadtM. S., Alcohol Education: A Comparison of Three Alternative Approaches, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, 1979.
20.
LynchM. B., “US”: Primary Prevention, Para-Counselling Research Project, Rogue Valley Council on Aging, Medford, Oregon, 1976.
21.
MasonM. L., Drug Education Effects: Final Report, Young Adult Services, Gainesville, Florida, 1972.
22.
MorganH. G. and HaywardA., The Effects of Drug Talks to School Children, British Journal of Addiction, 71, pp. 285–288, 1976.
23.
StuartR. B., Teaching Facts About Drugs: Pushing or Preventing, Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, pp. 189–201, 1974.
24.
SwisherJ. D., Four Approaches to Drug Abuse Prevention Among College Students, Journal of College Student Personnel, 14, pp. 231–235, 1973.
25.
SwisherJ. D. and PiniukA. J., An Evaluation of Keystone Central School District's Drug Education Program, The Pennsylvania Governor's Justice Commission, Region IV, 1973.
26.
WilliamsA. F.DiCiccoL. M. and UnterbergerJ., Philosophy and Evaluation of an Alcohol Education Program, Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 29, pp. 685–702, 1968.
27.
StoesselR., A Cross-Modality Evaluation of Drug Abuse Prevention Program Effectiveness, Addiction Services Agency, New York, 1974.
28.
WeimerJ. M., The Effects of Film Treatments on Attitudes that Correlate with Drug Behavior, Dissertation, University of South Dakota, 1976.
29.
GoodstadtM. S., Alcohol and Drug Education: Models and Outcomes, Health Education Monographs, 6, pp. 263–279, 1978.
30.
DornN. and ThompsonA., An Exercise in Choosing Educational Goals, International Journal of Health Education, 19, pp. 260–269, 1976.
