The present study is an investigation of the effects of person-environment fit on control in an elderly population. Person-environment fit theory predicts that a fit or a match between the characteristics of the person and the characteristics of the environment is important in determining positive outcomes. In the present study, a measure of the misfit (i.e., the mismatch) between an individual's perceptions of control and that individual's desire for control was used to predict life satisfaction, depression, and self-reported health. The misfit between these constructs was found to be a significant predictor of depression, suggesting that a person-environment fit model may be important in explaining this outcome variable. In contrast to the hypothesis, misfit did not significantly predict life satisfaction, and only approached significance in the physical health model. Possible interpretations and implications of these findings were discussed, and potential future research directions were suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RodinJ.TimkoC.HarrisS., The Construct of Control: Biological and Psychosocial Correlates, in Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 5, EisdorferC.LawtonM. P.MaddoxG. L. (eds.), Springer, New York, pp. 3–55, 1985.
2.
RodinJ., Aging and Health: Effects of the Sense of Control, Science, 233, pp. 1271–1276, 1986.
3.
BaltesP. B.CorneliusS. W.SpiroA.IIINesselroadeJ. R.WillisS. L., Integration Versus Differentiation of Fluid Crystallized Intelligence in Old Age, Developmental Psychology, 16, pp. 625–635, 1980.
4.
RodinJ., Health, Control, and Aging, in The Psychology of Control and Aging, BaltesM. M.BaltesP. B. (eds.), Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp. 139–165, 1986.
5.
BrehmS. S.SmithT. W., Social Psychological Approaches to Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, in Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (3rd Edition), GarfieldS. L.BerginA. E. (eds.), Wiley, New York, pp. 69–115, 1986.
6.
KoffkaK., Principles of Gestalt Psychology, Harcourt Brace, New York, 1935.
7.
LewinK., A Dynamic Theory of Personality: Selected Papers, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1935.
8.
MurrayH. A., Exploration in Personality, Oxford University Press, New York, 1938.
9.
LawtonM. P., Competence, Environmental Press, and the Adaptation of Older People, in Aging and the Environment, LawtonM. P.WindleyP. G.ByertsT. O. (eds.), Springer, New York, pp. 33–59, 1982.
10.
LawtonM. P.NahemowL., Ecology and the Aging Process, in Psychology of Adult Development and Aging, EisdorferC.LawtonM. P. (eds.), American Psychological Association, Washington, pp. 619–674, 1973.
11.
KahanaE., A Congruence Model of Person-Environment Interaction, in Aging and the Environment, LawtonM. P.WindleyP. G.ByertsT. O. (eds.), Springer, New York, pp. 97–121, 1982.
12.
KahanaE.LiangJ.FeltonB. J., Alternative Models of Person-Environment Fit: Prediction of Morale in Three Homes for the Aged, Journal of Gerontology, 35, pp. 584–595, 1980.
13.
FrenchJ. R. P.Jr.RodgersW.CobbS., Adjustment as Person-Environment Fit, in Coping and Adaptation, CoelhoG. V.HamburgD. A.AdamsJ. E. (eds.), Basic Books, Inc., New York, pp. 316–333, 1974.
14.
MagnussonD.TorestadB., The Individual as an Interactive Agent in the Environment, in Person-Environment Psychology, WalshW. B.CraikK. H.PriceR. H. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 89–126, 1992.
15.
CaplanR. D., Person-Environment Fit: Past, Present and Future, in Stress Research, C. CooperL. (ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 35–78, 1983.
16.
LachmanM. E., Personal Control in Later Life: Stability, Change, and Cognitive Correlates, in The Psychology of Control and Aging, BaltesM. M.BaltesP. B. (eds.), Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp. 207–236, 1986.
17.
SkinnerE. A., Perceived Control, Motivation, and Coping, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 1995.
18.
BurgerJ. M.CooperH. M., The Desirability of Control, Motivation and Emotion, 3, pp. 381–393, 1979.
19.
BurgerJ. M., Individual Differences in Control Motivation and Social Information Processing, in Control Motivation and Social Cognition, WearyG.GleicherF.MarshK. L. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.
20.
ConwayT. L.VickersR. R.Jr.FrenchJ. R. P.Jr., An Application of Person-Environment Fit Theory: Perceived Versus Desired Control, Journal of Social Issues, 48, pp. 95–107, 1992.
21.
Indiana Fact Book, State of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, 1992.
22.
ReidD. W.ZeiglerM., The Desired Control Measure and Adjustment Among the Elderly, in Research with the Locus of Control Construct: Vol. 1, Assessment Methods, LefcourtH. M. (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 127–159, 1981.
23.
CaplanR. D., Person-Environment Fit Theory and Organizations: Commensurate Dimensions, Time Perspectives, and Mechanisms, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, pp. 248–267, 1987.
24.
BurgerJ. M., Desire for Control, Plenum Press, New York, 1992.
25.
RotterJ. B., Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement, Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80: 1, (Whole No. 609), 1966.
26.
LevensonH., Activism and Powerful Others: Distinctions Within the Concept of Internal-External Control, Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, pp. 377–383, 1974.
27.
RadloffL. S., A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population, Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, pp. 385–401, 1977.
28.
WoodV.WylieM. L.SheaforB., An Analysis of a Short Self-Report Measure of Life Satisfaction: Correlation with Rater Judgments, Journal of Gerontology, 24, pp. 465–469, 1969.
29.
NeugartenB. L.HavighurstR. J.TobinS. S., The Measurement of Life Satisfaction, Journal of Gerontology, 16, pp. 134–143, 1961.
30.
BellocN. B.BreslowL.HochstimJ. R., Measurement of Physical Health in a General Population Survey, American Journal of Epidemiology, 93, pp. 328–336, 1971.
31.
MaxwellS. E.DelaneyH. D., Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective, Brooks/Cole, California, 1990.
32.
BradburnN. M., The Structure of Psychological Well-Being, Aldine, Chicago, 1969.
33.
BradburnN. M.CaplovitzD., Reports on Happiness: A Pilot Study, Aldine, Chicago, 1965.
34.
WarrP.BarterJ.BrownbridgeG., On the Independence of Positive and Negative Affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, pp. 644–651, 1983.
35.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A., The Independence of Positive and Negative Affect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, pp. 1105–1117, 1984.
36.
LawtonM. P.MossM.KlebanM. H., A. Glicksman, and M. Rovine, A Two-Factor Model of Caregiving Appraisal and Psychological Well-Being, Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, pp. P181–189, 1991.
37.
LawtonM. P., Environment and Other Determinants of Well-Being in Older People, The Gerontologist, 23, pp. 349–357, 1983.
38.
LuszczM. A., Predictors of Memory in Young-Old and Old-Old Adults, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15, pp. 147–166, 1992.
39.
LernerR. M., The Nature-Nurture Controversy: Dynamic Interactional Perspectives, in Concepts and Theories of Human Development, LernerR. M. (ed.), Random House, New York, pp. 139–182, 1986.
40.
HeckhausenJ.SchulzR., A Life-Span Theory of Control, Psychological Review, 102, pp. 284–304, 1995.
41.
LernerJ. V.BakerN.LernerR. M., A Person-Context Goodness of Fit Model of Adjustment, Advances in Cognitive-Behavioral Research, 4, pp. 111–136, 1985.
42.
LernerJ. V., The Role of Temperament in Psychosocial Adaptation in Early Adolescents: A Test of a “Goodness of Fit” Model, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 143, pp. 149–157, 1983.
43.
LefcourtH. M.MartinR. A.SalehW. E., Locus of Control and Social Support: Interactive Moderators of Stress, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, pp. 378–389, 1984.
44.
SandlerI. N.LakeyB., Locus of Control as a Stress Moderator: The Role of Control Perceptions and Social Support, American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, pp. 65–80, 1982.
