This study investigated the impact of cause of death on responses to a bereaved individual. Sixty participants (30 men and 30 women) listened to an audiotape of a recently bereaved widow. There were three versions of the tape, each identical except for the stated cause of death: suicide, accident, or heart attack. Participants listened and responded to three segments of the tape. Results indicated that respondents were more anxious after the interaction than before. In addition, perceptions of the individual bereaved by suicide were more negative, but these perceptual differences were not reflected in quantitative measures of behavior. Qualitative data suggested that for suicidal deaths issues of blame and responsibility are more salient than for deaths due to accidents or natural causes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ShneidmanE. S., On the Nature of Suicide, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, 1969.
2.
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstracts of the U.S.: 1986 (109th Edition) Washington, D.C., 1989.
3.
VanderWalJ.The Aftermath of Suicide: A Review of the Empirical Evidence, Omega, 20, pp. 149–171, 1989–1990.
4.
CalhounL. G.SelbyJ. W., and SelbyL. E., The Psychological Aftermath of Suicide: An Analysis of Current Evidence, Clinical Psychology Review, 2, pp. 409–420, 1982.
5.
DominoG.CohenA., and GonzalezR., Jewish and Christian Attitudes on Suicide, Journal of Religion and Health, 20, pp. 107–201, 1981.
6.
GogginW. C. and RangeL. M., The Disadvantages of Hindsight in the Perception of Suicide, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3, pp. 232–237, 1985.
7.
SawyerD. and SobalJ., Public Attitudes toward Suicide: Demographic and Ideological Correlates, Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, pp. 92–101, 1987.
8.
SinghB. K.WilliamsJ. W., and RytherB. J., Public Approval of Suicide: A Situational Analysis, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 16, pp. 409–418, 1986.
9.
CalhounL. G.SelbyJ. W., and FaulstichM. E., Reactions to the Parents of the Child Suicide: A Study of Social Impressions, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, pp. 535–536, 1980.
10.
CalhounL. G. and AllenB. G., Social Reactions to the Survivor of a Suicide in the Family: A Review of the Literature, Omega, 23, pp. 95–107, 1991.
11.
RangeL. M. and KastnerJ. W., Community Reactions to Attempted and Completed Child Suicide, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, pp. 1085–1093, 1988.
12.
WagnerK. G. and CalhounL. G., Perceptions of Social Support by Suicide Survivors and their Social Networks, Omega, 24, pp. 61–73, 1991.
13.
DunnR. G. and Morrish-VidnersD., The Psychological and Social Experience of Suicide Survivors, Omega, 18, pp. 175–215, 1987–88.
14.
LehmanD. R.EllardJ. H., and WortmanC. B., Social Support for the Bereaved: Recipient's and Provider's Perspectives on What Is Helpful, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, pp. 438–446, 1986.
15.
SpielbergerC. D.GorsuchR. L., and LusheneR. E., STAI Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., Palo Alto, California, 1968.
16.
CalhounL. G.SelbyJ. W.TedeschiR., and DavisL., The Aftermath of Suicide: An Instrument for Measuring Reactions to the Surviving Family, Journal of Psychiatric Treatment and Evaluation, 3, pp. 99–103, 1980.
17.
RangeL. M.McDonaldD., and AndersonH., Factor Structure of Calhoun's Youth Suicide Scale, Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, pp. 262–266, 1987.
18.
CowgellV. G., Interpersonal Effects of a Suicidal Communication, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, pp. 592–599, 1977.
19.
LincolnY. S. and GubaE. G., Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, 1985.
20.
CannA. and RossD., Olfactory Stimuli as Context Cues in Human Memory, American Journal of Psychology, 102, pp. 91–102, 1989.
21.
CalhounL. G.AbemathyC. B., and SelbyJ. W., The Rules of Bereavement: Are Suicidal Deaths Different?, Journal of Community Psychology, 14, pp. 213–218, 1986.
22.
DeauxK. and LewisL. L., Structure of Gender Stereotypes: Interrelationships among Components and Gender Label, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, pp. 991–1005, 1984.
23.
HallJ., Nonverbal Sex Differences: Communication Accuracy and Expressive Style, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 1984.
24.
FiskeS. T. and TaylorS. E., Social Cognition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.
25.
DarleyJ. K. and FazioR. H., Expectancy Confirmation Processes Arising in the Social Interaction Sequence, American Psychologist, 35, pp. 867–881, 1980.
