We propose a whole-class view of microworld design, in which the total ecology of students, technology, and teacher is considered by the decisions and choices of the design. Through a case-study analysis of a classroom implementation, we illustrate a dynamic geometry microworld designed using such an approach and attempt to identify both the effects such an approach has on student affect and participation and the roles that educational technology fills in such a social context. We argue that whole-class microworld design not only has practical benefits in terms of classroom time and management, but also develops social interactions conducive to educative learning experiences.
BussiBartolini M. (1998). Joint activity in the mathematics classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis. In SeegerF.VoigtJ., & WaschescioU. (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 13–49). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BattistaM. (1997). Shape makers: Developing geometric reasoning with the geometer's sketchpad. Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
4.
BaulacY.BellemainF., & LabordeJ. M. (designers) (1992). Cabri: The interactive geometry notebook (Cabri Gèomètre). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
5.
BaulacY.BellemainF., & LabordeJ. M. (designers) (1994). Cabri II. Dallas, TX: Texas Instruments.
6.
BeckerH.RavitzJ., & WongY. (1999). Teaching, learning and computing 1998 national survey. University of California, Irvine: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
7.
BoalerJ. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex and setting. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
ClementsD.BattistaM., & SaramaJ. (2001). Logo and geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph Series, 10.
10.
CobbP. (1989). Experiential, cognitive and anthropological perspectives in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 32–42.
11.
CobbP.BoufiA.McClainK., & WhitenackJ. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 258–277.
12.
CobbP., & YackelE. (1998). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In SeegerF.VoigtJ., & WaschescioU. (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 158–190). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.
14.
DeweyJ. (1938/1963). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.
15.
GoldenbergE. P., & CuocoA. A. (1998). What is dynamic geometry? In LehrerR. & ChazanD. (Eds.), Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space (pp. 351–367). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16.
HewittD. (2001). Arbitrary and necessary: Part 2 assisting memory. For the learning of mathematics, 21(1), 44–51.
17.
HigginsonW. (1973). Toward mathesis: A paradigm for the development of humanistic mathematics curricula. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Alberta.
18.
HigginsonW., & FlewellingG., (Eds.) (1996). Tomorrow's mathematics classroom: A vision of mathematics education for Canada. Kingston, Ontario: MSTE Group, Queen's University, 1997 [The Primary, Junior, Intermediate and Senior versions of these documents are available at http://tilp.educ.queensu.ca/faculty/tmc/.]
NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24.
NoddingsN. (1989). Theoretical and practical concerns about small groups in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 89(5), 607–623.
25.
NossR., & HoylesC. (1996). Windows on mathematics meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
26.
RoschelleJ., & JackiwN. (2000). Technology design as educational research: Interweaving imagination, inquiry, and impact. In KellyA. & LeshR. (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 777–797). Amsterdam: Kluwer.
27.
ScottP. (1997, January) Taming the dragon. Mathematics in schools, 26(1), 2–4.
28.
SchattschneiderD., & KingJ., (Eds.) (1997). Geometry turned on!: Dynamic software in learning, teaching, and research. Washington, D.C.: The Mathematical Association of America.
29.
SmithG. C., & TaborP. (1996). The role of the artist-designer. In WinogradT. (Ed.), Bringing design to software (pp. 37–57). New York: ACM Press.
30.
SierpinskaA., & LermanS. (1996). Epistemologies of mathematics and of mathematics education. In BishopA. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 469–501). Dortrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31.
SteffeL., & WiegelH. (1994). Cognitive play and mathematical learning in computer microworlds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2–3), 111–134.
32.
SteffeL., & OliveJ. (1996). Symbolizing as a constructive activity in a computer microworld. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 113–138.
33.
SternbergR. (1988). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
StipekD.SalmonJ.GivvinK.KazemiE.SaxeG., & MacGyversV. (1998). The value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 465–488.
35.
YackelE., & CobbP. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentations and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.
