A sample of 570 university students were asked to react to a statement to the effect that “unfit” persons should be killed by society as a “final solution” to the problems of overpopulation and personal misery. Variations on this theme were provided different subgroups of the sample. Although responses varied as a function of the particular condition established, agreement reached substantial proportions, sometimes gaining acceptance from over 50 percent of the respondents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FrankJ.Group psychology and the elimination of war. In Peace is Possible: A reader on the world order. New York: 1966World Law Fund.
2.
HollowayR. L.Jr.Human aggression: The need for a species-specific framework. In War: The anthropology of armed conflict and agression. Natural History, Dec. 1, 1967, pp. 40–44.
3.
LataneB. and DarleyJ.When will people help in a crisis. Psychology Today, December, 1968.
4.
LernerM. J. and MathewGail. Reactions to suffering of others under conditions of indirect responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 5, 319–375.
5.
LernerM. J. and SimonsCarolyn H.Observers' reaction to the “innocent victim”—compassion or rejection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 5, 203–210.
6.
MarshallJ. and ManssonH. H.Punitiveness, recall and the police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1968, 3, 129–139.
7.
MilgramS.Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 371–378. Also, reported in International Journal of Psychiatry, October, 1968.
8.
Presidential Commission on Civil Disorder. U.S. Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1968.
9.
SartreJ. P.On genocide. Ramparts, Feb. 1968.
10.
WalsterE.Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 3, 73–79.
11.
ZimbardoP.Studies in violence and vandalism. Reported at the International Congress of Psychology, 1969, London, United Kingdom.
