An exploratory field study was undertaken to explore the way in which age-concepts are experienced, and to assess the relationship of age identities to each other. In addition, this study seeks to establish a new multidimensional age scale, Cognitive Age, to replace the well-established standard scale, Identity Age. This research also functions as a follow-up to an exploration by Kastenbaum et al. of “ages-of-me.” Ths most frequently used subjective age measures, Identity Age and Feel/Age, are unidimensional, and thus very difficult to evaluate in terms of reliability and/or validity. A multidimensional view of age as reflected by Personal Age is very appealing, but complex to assess. Cognitive Age successfully merges Identity Age, in which respondents identify with age-referrent groupings, and Personal Age, in which respondents rate themselves in terms of four functional age dimensions. The resultant Cognitive Age scale is both reliable and valid.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellB., Significance of Functional Age for Interdisciplinary and Longitudinal Research in Aging, Aging and Human Development, 3, pp. 145–147, 1972.
2.
JarvikL. F., Thoughts on the Psychobiology of Aging, American Psychologist, 30, pp. 576–583, 1975.
3.
RoseC. L., The Measurement of Social Age, Aging and Human Development, 3, pp. 153–167, 1972.
4.
PetersG. R., Self-Conceptions of the Aged, Age-Identification and Aging, The Gerontologist, 11, pp. 69–73, 1971.
5.
CutlerN. E., Subjective Age Identification, in Research Instruments in Social Gerontology: Clinical and Social Psychology, Volume 1, MangenD. J. and PetersenW. A. (eds.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 437–461, 1982.
6.
UnderhillL. and CadwellF., “What Age Do You Feel” Age Perception Study, The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1, pp. 18–27, Summer 1983.
7.
KastenbaumR.DerbinV.SabatiniP., and ArrtS., “The Ages of Me” Toward Personal and Interpersonal Definitions of Functional Aging, Aging and Human Development, 3, pp. 197–211, 1972.
8.
BarakB., Cognitive Reference Age Among the Elderly: A New Concept for Marketing, unpublished doctoral dissertation, the City University of New York, New York, NY, 1979.
9.
BarakB. and SchiffmanL. G., Cognitive Age: A Nonchronological Age Variable, in Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 8, MonroeK. B. (ed.), Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 602–606, 1981.
10.
BarakB. and GouldS., Alternative Age Measures: A Research Note, in Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 12, HirschmanE. C. and HolbrookM. B. (eds.), Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 53–58, 1985.
11.
RossI., Information Processing and the Older Consumer: Marketing and Public Policy Implications, in Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 9, MitchellA. (ed.), Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 31–39, 1982.
12.
KastenbaumR. and DurkeeN., Elderly People View Old Age, in New Thoughts on Old Age, KastenbaumR. (ed.), Springer, New York, NY, pp. 250–262, 1964.
13.
BreytspraakL. M. and GeorgeL. K., Self-Concept and Self-Esteem, in Research Instruments in Social Gerontology: Clinical and Social Psychology, Volume 1, MangenD. J. and PetersenW. A. (eds.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 241–302, 1982.
14.
RosenbergM., Conceiving the Self, Basic Books, New York, NY, 1979.
15.
SirgyM. J., Self-Concept in Consumer Behavior: A Critical Review, Journal of Consumer Research, 9, pp. 287–300, December 1982.
16.
BloomK. L., Age and the Self-Concept, American Journal of Psychiatry, 118, pp. 534–538, 1961.
17.
BultenaG. L. and PowersE. A., Denial of Aging: Age Identification and Reference Group Orientations, Journal of Gerontology, 11, pp. 748–754, 1978.
18.
BorlandD. C., Research on Middle Age: An Assessment, The Gerontologist, 18, pp. 379–386, August 1978.
19.
MutranE. and GeorgeL. K., Alternative Methods of Measuring Role/Identity: A Research Note, Social Forces, 60, pp. 866–876, March 1982.
20.
LinnM. W. and HunterK., Perception of Age in the Elderly, Journal of Gerontology, 34, pp. 46–52, 1979.
21.
PuglesiJ. T. and JacksonD. W., Age Identification and Self Concept in Later Adulthood, Psychological Reports, 43, pp. 789–790, 1978.
22.
ZolaI. K., Feelings about Age among Older People, Journal of Gerontology, 17, pp. 65–68, 1962.
23.
BengstonV. L. and CutlerN. E., Generations and Intergenerational Relations: Perspectives on Age Groups and Social Change, in Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, BinstockR. H. and ShanasE. (eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, pp. 130–159, 1976.
24.
BengstonV. L.KasschauP. L., and RaganP. K., The Impact of Social Structure on Aging Individuals, in Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, BirrenJ. E. and SchaieK. W. (eds.), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY, pp. 327–359, 1977.
25.
MutranE. and BurkeP. J., Personalism as a Component of Old Age Identity, Research on Aging, 1, pp. 38–63, 1979.
26.
WoodV.WylieM., and SheaferB., An Analysis of a Short Self-Report Measure of Life-Satisfaction: Correlation with Rater Judgements, Journal of Gerontology, 24, pp. 265–469, 1969.
27.
CohenJ. and CohenP., Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ, 1975.
