The early leaders of the hospice movement shared a number of attitudes with the founders of the alternative institutions of the 1960s and early 1970s: nostalgia for simple, old fashioned ways, dissatisfaction with bureaucratic and authoritarian institutions, faith in the power of nature, a determination to avoid domination by experts, and a desire to improve the quality of personal relationships. However, as hospices have become better established, they gradually have been incorporated into the dominant health care system and have lost their uniqueness. Some have affiliated with hospitals or home health agencies. Even autonomous organizations are subject to pressures for accommodation because they rely on the established order for resources, personnel, and political acceptance. Organizations receiving payment under the new Medicare benefit must adhere to a set of regulations that may distort the movement. Though creation of this benefit may have been facilitated by increased support for hospice ideals, the government views hospices primarily as a way to save money. Paradoxically, as hospices have grown in popularity, the critical force of the movement has been blunted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CaseJ., and TaylorR. C. R. (eds.). Co-ops, Communes and Collectives: Experiments in Social Change in the 1960s and 1970s. Pantheon, New York, 1979.
2.
GraubardA.Free the Children: Radical Reform and the Free School Movement. Vintage, New York, 1972.
3.
CohenK. P.Hospice: Prescription for Terminal Care. Aspen Systems Corporation, Germantown, MD, 1979.
4.
StoddardS.The Hospice Movement: A Better Way of Caring for the Dying. Vintage, New York, 1978.
5.
FultonR., and OwenG.Hospice in America: From principle to practice. In Hospice: The Living Idea, edited by DameC.SaundersD. H.Summers, and TellerN., pp. 9–18. W. B. Saunders, London, 1981.
6.
RossmanP.Hospice: Creating New Models for the Terminally Ill. Fawcett Columbine, New York, 1977.
7.
WilsonD. C.AjemianI., and MountB. M.Montreal (1975)—the Royal Victoria Hospital palliative care service. Death Education Spring/Summer: 3–19, 1978.
8.
CoxM.S.The Connecticut hospice volunteer program. In A Hospice Handbook: A New Way to Care for the Dying, edited by HamiltonM. P. and ReidH. F., pp. 157–171. William B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 1980.
9.
BuckinghamR. W.The Complete Hospice Guide. Harper and Row, New York, 1983.
10.
TorrensP. R.Current status of hospice programs. In Hospice Programs and Public Policy, edited by TorrensP. R., American Hospital Association, Chicago, 1985.
11.
BurgerS.Three approaches to patient care: Hospice, nursing homes, and hospitals. In A Hospice Handbook: A New Way to Care for the Dying, edited by HamiltonM. P. and ReidH. F., pp. 131–143. William B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 1980.
12.
VandenbosG. R.DeLeonP. H., and PallakM. S.An alternative to traditional medical care for the terminally ill: Humanitarian policy and political issues in hospice care. American Psychologist37(11): 1245–1248, November 1982.
13.
HoldenC.Hospices for the dying, relief from pain and fear. In A Hospice Handbook: A New Way to Care for the Dying, edited by HamiltonM. P. and ReidH. F., pp. 57–63, William B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, 1980.
14.
PotterJ. F.A challenge for the hospice movement. New Eng. J. Med., 3: 53–55, 1980.
15.
GraubardA.From free schools to “educational alternatives.” In Co-ops, Communes and Collectives: Experiments in Social Change in the 1960's and 1970's, edited by CaseJ. and TaylorR. C. R., Pantheon, New York, 1979.
16.
AikenL. H., and MarxM. M.Perspective on the public policy debate. In Hospice Programs and Public Policy, edited by TorrensP. R., American Hospital Association, Chicago, 1985.
17.
ZwerdlingD.The uncertain revival of food cooperatives. In Co-ops, Communes and Collectives: Experiments in Social Change in the 1960s and 1970s, edited by CaseJ. and TaylorR. C. R., Pantheon, New York, pp. 89–111, 1979.
18.
TorrensP. R.More than semantics: What is a hospice. In Hospice Programs and Public Policy, edited by TorrensP. R., American Hospital Association, Chicago, 1985.
19.
LamersW. H.Jr.Home care hospice programs. Family and Community Health5(3): 1–9, November, 1982.
20.
BowlesS. and GintisH.Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. Basic Books, New York, 1976.
21.
ConnorS. R. and KraymorL. K.An urban hospice program. Family and Community Health5(3): 39–53, November 1982.
22.
Liss-LevinsonW. S.Reality perspectives for psychological services in a hospice program. American Psychologist, pp. 1266–1278, November 1982.
23.
PicardButterfield H. and MagnoJ. G.Hospice the adjective, not the noun. American Psychologist37(11): 1254–1259, November 1982.
24.
LynnJ. and OsterweisM.Ethical issues arising in hospice care. In Hospice Programs and Public Policy, edited by TorrensP. R.American Hospital Association, Chicago, 1985.
25.
DooleyJ.The corruption of hospice. Public Welfare, Spring: 35–39, 1982.
26.
TehanC. T.Hospice in an existing home care agency. Family and Community Health5(3): 11–20, November 1982.
27.
WalterN. T.A hospice program within an acute care medical center or hospital. In A Hospice Handbook: A New Way to Care for the Dying, edited by HamiltonP. and ReidH. F., William B. Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, pp. 145–155, 1980.
28.
BuckinghamR. W., and LupuD.A comparative study of hospice services in the United States. Amer. J. Pub. Health72(5): 455–462, May 1982.
29.
KanterMoss R.Commitment Community: Communes and Utopias in Sociological Perspective. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1972.
30.
McAdamD.Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago, Chicago, 1982.
31.
LevyJ. A.The staging of negotiations between hospice and medical institutions. Urban Life11(3): 293–309, October 1982.
32.
LackS.New Haven (1974)—characteristics of a hospice program of care. Death Education, Spring/Summer: 41–52, 1978.
33.
CummingsM.Current status of hospice financing. In Hospice Programs and Public Policy, edited by TorrensP. R.American Hospital Association, Chicago, 1985.
34.
Owen-StillS.Today's hospice: An endangered species?Health and Medicine, Summer/Fall: 25–27, 1984.
35.
RobbinsD. A. and BlumJ. D.Considerations in hospice licensure and accreditation: (A) licensure. In Hospice Programs and Public Policy, edited by TorrensP. R.American Hospital Association, Chicago, 1985.
36.
TehanC.Considerations in hospice licensure and accreditation: (B) accreditation. In Hospice Programs and Public Policy, edited by TorrensP. R.American Hospital Association, Chicago, 1985.
37.
SidelV. W., and SidelR. (eds.). Reforming Medicine: Lessons of the Last Quarter Century. Pantheon, New York, 1984.
38.
MobergD.Alternative institutions and American socialism. In Co-ops, Communes and Collectives: Experiments in Social Change in the 1960s and 1970s, edited by CaseJ. and TaylorR. C. R., pp. 274–312. Pantheon, New York, 1979.
39.
BayerR., and FeldmanE.Hospice under the Medicare wing. Hastings Center Report December: 5–6, 1982.
40.
GibsonD. E.Hospice: Morality and economics. The Gerontologist24: 4–8, February 1984.
41.
HimmelsteinD. U., and WoolhandlerS.Medicine as industry: The health-care sector in the United States. Monthly Review35(11): 13–25, April 1984.
42.
Home Health Line. January 30, 1984.
43.
StarrP.The phantom community. In Co-ops, Communes and Collectives: Experiments in Social Change in the 1960s and 1970s, edited by CaseJ. and TaylorR. C. R.Pantheon, New York, 1979.
