Developmental aspects of ideational fluency, flexibility, and originality were assessed across five age groups (children, adolescents, young adults, adults, middle-aged adults) comparatively in two cultures (Chinese and American). A total of 316 Chinese participants ranging in age from nine to sixty years responded in writing (Cantonese) to presentation of four groups of acoustical stimuli. Responses were scored for fluency, flexibility, and originality of thought. Comparative American data were collected in a previous study. Significant age associated differences in fluency and flexibility were obtained for Chinese respondents. A cross-cultural MANOVA yielded significant main effects for culture; American scores were uniformly higher than Chinese. Developmental trends across age groups demonstrated cross-cultural similarity in the expression of originality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TorranceE. P., Understanding the Fourth Grade Slump in Creative Thinking, Cooperative Research Project No. 994, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education, Washington, D.C., 1967.
2.
AlpaughP. K. and BirrenJ. E., Variables Affecting Creative Contributions Across the Adult Life Span, Human Development, 20, pp. 240–248, 1977.
3.
JaquishG. A. and RippleR. E., Cognitive Creative Abilities and Self-Esteem Across the Adult Life-Span, Human Development, 24, pp. 110–119, 1981.
4.
GuilfordJ. P.WilsonR.ChristensenP. R., and LewisD. A., Factor-Analytic Study of Creative Thinking: I, Hypotheses and Description of Tests, Reports from the Psychological Laboratory, No. 4, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1951.
5.
GuilfordJ. P.WilsonR., and ChristensenP. R., Factor-Analytic Study of Creative Thinking: II, Administration of Tests and Analysis of Results, Reports from the Psychological Laboratory, No. 8, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1952.
6.
GuilfordJ. P. and ChristensenP. R., A Factor-Analytic Study of Verbal Fluency, Report from the Psychology Laboratory, No. 17, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1956.
7.
GuilfordJ. P.FrickJ. W.ChristensenP. R., and MerrifieldP. R., A Factor-Analytic Study of Flexibility in Thinking, Report from the Psychology Laboratory, No. 18, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 1957.
8.
GuilfordJ. P., The Nature of Human Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.
9.
BerryJ. W., Introduction to Methodology, in Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: MethodologyVol. 2, TriandisH. C. and BerryJ. W. (eds.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1980.
10.
AviramA. and MilgramR. M., Dogmatism Locus of Control, and Creativity in Children Educated in the Soviet Union, the United States, and Israel, Psycological Reports, 40, pp. 27–34, 1977.
11.
JarvieT. C. and AgassiJ. (eds.), Hong Kong: A Society in Transition, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1969.
12.
HoD. Y. F., Traditional Patterns of Socialization in Chinese Society, Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 23:2, pp. 81–95, 1981.
13.
CunningtonB. F. and TorranceE. P., Sounds and Images, Ginn and Co., Lexington, 1965.
14.
JaquishG. A. and RippleR. E., Divergent Thinking and Self-Esteem in Preadolescents and Adolescents, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9:2, pp. 143–152, 1980.
15.
KhatenaJ. and TorranceE. P., Thinking Creatively with Sounds and Words, Ginn and Co., Lexington, 1973.
16.
JaquishG. A., Phenomenal Complexity and Original Thinking in Adolescents, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 18:2, p. 145, 1984.
17.
SchaieK. W., Translations in Gerontology—From Lab to Life: Intellectual Functioning, American Psychologist, 29, pp. 802–807, 1974.
18.
BaltesP. B. (ed.), Life-Span Development and BehaviorVol. 1, Academic Press, New York, 1978.
19.
BirrenJ. E. and MorrisonD. F., Analysis of the WAIS Subtests in Relation to Age and Education, Journal of Gerontology, 16, pp. 363–369, 1961.
20.
TriandisH. C.MalpassR. S., and DavidsonA., Cross-Cultural Psychology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, 1972.
21.
RippleR. E. and JaquishG. A., Developmental Aspects of Ideational Fluency, Flexibility, and Originality: South Africa and the United States, South African Journal of Psychology, 12, pp. 95–100, 1982.
22.
CampbellD. T., Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes, Psychology Review, 67, pp. 380–400, 1960.
23.
TriandisH. C., Reflections on Trends in Cross-Cultural Research, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 11, pp. 35–58, 1980.
24.
HardingC., East Meets West: A Conflict of Values, Bulletin Hong Kong Psychological Society, 5, pp. 35–43, 1980.
25.
RippleR. E., Reflections on Doing Psychological Research in Hong Kong, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, Chinese University, Shatin, New Territories, 1982.
26.
SolomonR. H., Mao's Revolution and the Chinese Political Culture, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1971.
