The extensive use of computers by businesses makes it imperative for most business graduates to possess a fair amount of computer skills to effectively perform in today's work environment. Business schools are integrating computers into their curricula to provide their students with these skills. While many studies in education have evaluated the effect of computer-based education, there are very few in the field of business education. This study evaluates the influence of a computer-based support system on the decision-making skills of students in a introductory financial management course. It also evaluates the impact of various personal characteristics of the student on decision-making performance. An experimental design combined with a survey instrument is used to collect data from forty-two graduate students. Discriminant analysis is used to derive a profile of students classifiable into groups based on quality of performance and degree of satisfaction. The results of the study indicate that the computer support system does indeed improve the performance of the students. The results of discriminant analyses suggest aptitude to be an important variable that emerged consistently in all the discriminant models. The other important predictors of improved performance and satisfaction with computer-supported instruction were observed to be domain expertise, domain experience, system experience, and the gender of the students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KlingR., New Wave of Computing in College and University—A Social Analysis, ACM-SIGCUE Outlook on Computing in Higher Education, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp. 19–21, 1986.
2.
EdwardsJ.NortonS.TaylorS.WeissM., and DusseldorpR., How Effective is CAI? A Review of Research, Educational Technology, 33, pp. 147–153, 1975.
3.
JamisonD.SuppesP., and WellsS., The Effectiveness of Alternative Instructional Media: A Survey, Review of Educational Research, 44, pp. 1–61, 1974.
4.
KulikJ. A.Chen-LinC., and CohenP. A., Effectiveness of Computer Based College Teaching, Review of Educational Research, 50: 4, pp. 525–544, 1980.
5.
NiemicR. and WalbergH. J., Comparative Effects of Computer-assisted Instruction: A Synthesis of Reviews, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3: 1, pp. 19–37, 1987.
6.
CampbellP. F. and McCabeG. P., Predicting the Success of Freshmen in a Computer Science Major, Communications of the ACM, 27: 11, pp. 1108–1113, 1984.
7.
GreerJ., High School Experience and University Achievement in Computer Science, AEDS Journal, 19: 2, pp. 216–225, 1986.
8.
OmanP. W., Identifying Student Characteristics Influencing Success in Introductory Computer Science Courses, AEDS Journal, 19: 2, pp. 106–112, 1986.
9.
ButcherD. F. and MuthW. A., Predicting Performance in an Introductory Computer Science Course, Communications of the ACM, 28: 3, pp. 263–268, 1985.
10.
CronanT. P.EmbryP. R., and WhiteS. D., Identifying Factors that Influence Performance of Non-computing Majors in the Business Computer Information Systems Course, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, pp. 431–443, Summer, 1989.
11.
FrandJ. L. and McLeanR. E., Summary of the Second Annual Survey of UCLA Survey of Business School Computer Usage, Communication of the ACM, 29: 1, pp. 12–18, 1986.
12.
BoenL. L., Educational Technology Research: Teaching with an Interactive Computer System, Educational Technology, 23: 3, pp. 42–43, 1983.
13.
CastellanJ., Computers and the Shape of the Future, ACM-SIGCUE Bulletin—Topics in Computer Education, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 1986.
14.
BalkovichE.LermanS., and ParmeleeP. R., Computing in Higher Eduction: The Athena Experience, Communications of the ACM, 28: 11, pp. 1214–1224, 1985.
15.
AtheyT. H., What's Happening in Computer Based Learning, Interface—The Computer Education Quarterly, 5: 2, pp. 26–29, 1983.
16.
FuchsbergG., Business Schools Get Bad Grades, The Wall Street Journal, p. B1, June 6, 1990.
17.
SamuelsonR. J., What Good are B-Schools?, Newsweek, p. 49, May 14, 1991.
18.
The Center for Research on Security Prices, University of Chicago, Chicago, 1986.
19.
Standard and Poor, Industrial Compustat, Standard and Poor's Compustat Service, Inc., Englewood, Colorado, 1986.
20.
BuzzellR. D. and GaleB. T., The PIMS Principles Linking Strategy to Performance, The Free Press, New York, 1987.
21.
VarnhagenC. K. and ZumboB. D., CAI as an Adjunt to Teaching Introductory Statistics: Affect Mediates Learning, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 6: 1, pp. 29–40, 1990.
22.
VinsonhalerJ. F. and BassR. K., A Summary of Ten Major Studies on CAI Drill and Practice, Educational Technology, 12, pp. 29–32, 1972.
23.
AldermanD. L., Evaluation of the TICIIT Computer Assisted Instructional System in the Community College, Educational Testing Services, (ETS PR 78–10), Princeton, New Jersey, 1978.
24.
GlassG. V., Primary, Secondary, and Meta Analysis of Research, Educational Researcher, 52, pp. 3–8, 1976.
25.
ClarkR. E., Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media, Review of Educational Research, 53: 4, pp. 445–460, 1983.
26.
DunkinM. J. and BarnesJ., Research on Teaching in Higher Education, in Handbook of Research on Teaching, WittrockM. C. (ed.), MacMillan and Co., New York, 1986.
27.
SimonA. and BoyerE. G. (eds.), Mirrors for Behavior III: An Anthology of Observation Instruments, Communication Materials Center, Wyncote, Pennsylvania, 1974.
28.
ClarkR. E. and SalomonG., Media in Teaching, in Handbook of Research on Teaching, WittrockM. C. (ed.), MacMillan and Company, New York, 1986.
29.
ClarkR. E. and SnowR. E., Alternative Designs for Instructional Technology Research, AV Communication Review, 23: 4, pp. 373–394, 1975.
30.
CriswellE. and SwezeyR. W., Behavior Learning Theory-Based Computer Courseware Evaluation, Educational Technology, 24: 11, pp. 43–46, 1984.
31.
BokD., The Use of New Technology in College Education — Part Two, Computers and People, 34: 9–10, pp. 7–13, 1985.
32.
LucasH. C., Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation, MIS Quarterly, 2: 2, pp. 27–48, 1978.
33.
DavisF. D.BagozziR. P., and WarshawP. R., User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 35: 8, pp. 982–1003, 1989.
34.
IgabariaM., End-user Computing Effectiveness: A Structural Equation Model, Omega, 18: 6, pp. 637–652, 1990.
35.
FishbeinM. and AzjenI., Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 1975.
36.
RobeyD., User Attitudes and Management Information Systems Use, Academy of Management Journal, 22: 3, pp. 527–538, 1979.
37.
IgabariaM.ParasuramanS., and PavriF., A Path Analytic Study of the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage, Journal of Management Systems, 2: 2, pp. 1–14, 1990.
38.
CheneyP. H.MannR. I., and AmorosoD. L., Organizational Factors Affecting the Success of End-user Computing, Journal of Management Information Systems, 3: 1, pp. 65–80, 1988.
39.
RivardS. and HuffS. L., Factors of Success for End-user Computing, Communications of the ACM, 31: 5, pp. 552–561, 1988.
40.
ZmudR. W., Individual Differences and MIS Success: A Review of the Empirical Literature, Management Science, 25: 10, pp. 966–979, 1982.
41.
ClarkeV. A. and ChambersS. M., Gender-based Factors in Computing Enrollments and Achievement: Evidence from a Study of Tertiary Students, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5: 4, pp. 409–429, 1989.
42.
GattikerU. E., Teaching Micro-computer Skills to Management Students: Academic Achievement, Gender, Student Effort on Homework and Learning Performance, Proceedings of the Eighth ICIS, Pittsburgh, 1987.
43.
GilroyF. D. and DesaiH. B., Computer Anxiety: Sex, Race, and Age, International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 25, pp. 711–719, 1986.
44.
IgbariaM. and ParasuramanS., A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety, and Attitudes Toward Microcomputers, Journal of Management, 15: 3, pp. 373–388, 1989.
45.
TaylorR. N., Age and Experience as Determinants of Managerial Information Processing and Decision-making Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 18, pp. 74–81, 1975.
46.
KeenP. G. W. and MortonScott M. S., Decision Support System: An Organizational Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1978.
47.
IvesB. and OlsonM. H., User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research, Management Science, 30: 5, pp. 586–604, 1984.
48.
KingW. R. and SnitkinR. S., Determinants of the Effectiveness of Personal Decision Support Systems, Information and Management, 10: 2, pp. 83–89, 1986.
49.
KingW. R. and RodriguezJ. I., Evaluating Management Information Systems, MIS Quarterly, 2: 3, pp. 43–51, 1978.
50.
KingW. R. and EpsteinB. J., Assessing Information System Value: An Experimental Study, Decision Sciences, 14, pp. 34–45, 1983.
51.
BaileyJ. and PearsonS., Developing a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction, Management Science, 29: 5, pp. 530–545, 1983.
52.
IvesB.OlsonM., and BaroudiJ., The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction, Communication of the ACM, 26: 10, pp. 530–545, 1983.
53.
LloydB. H. and GrasandC., Reliability and Factor Validity of Computer Attitude Scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44: 2, pp. 501–505, 1984.
54.
AndersonR. E., Females Surpass Males in Computer Problem Solving: Findings from the Minnesota Computer Literacy Assessment, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, pp. 39–51, 1987.
55.
HallJ. A., Gender Effects in Decoding Nonverbal Cues, Psychological Bulletin, 85, pp. 845–857, 1978.
56.
ParasuramanS. and IgabariaM., An Examination of Gender Differences in the Determinants of Computer Anxiety and Attitudes Towards Microcomputers among Managers, International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 32, pp. 327–340, 1989.
57.
ChervanyN. L. and DicksonG. W., An Experimental Evaluation of Information Overload in Production Environment, Management Science, 20, pp. 1335–1344, 1974.
58.
FowlerG. C. and GlorfeldL. W., Predicting Aptitudes in Introductory Computing: A Classification Model, AEDS Journal, 14: 2, pp. 96–109, 1981.
59.
CampbellD. J. and StanleyJ. L., Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research, Rand-McNally, Chicago, 1966.
60.
GoldsteinM. and DillonW. R., Discrete Discriminant Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1978.
61.
HairJ. F.Jr.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L., and GrablowskyB. J., Multivariate Data Analysis, P.P.C., Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1983.
62.
AndersonT. W., Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.New York, 1958.
63.
RamamurthyK.PremkumarG., and KingW. R., User Characteristics—DSS Effectiveness Linkage—An Empirical Assessment, International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 36, pp. 469–505, 1992.
