The aim of the article is to illustrate the contribution of research with literary tests to study Self1 and social relationships. We briefly overview, first, different theoretical approaches using literature in social psychology, second, the analysis of Self and identity within the framework of social representations. This perspective considers literary texts—co-creations of their time—worth of study to test and expand social psychological knowledge. In the present research the importance of the individualism—collectivism dimension to understand social “worlds,” and of dynamic forces underlying social life is tested. After considering studies on Self and culture in the Indian context, a novel by Anita Desai—a recognized authoress, renowned in India and in the West—is analyzed. Content and correspondence analyses were performed to detect dimensions underlying the portrayed characters and relationships. The resulting structures partially support but also extend social psychological knowledge on Self and relationships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamopoulosJ. (1982). Analysis of interpersonal structures in literary works of three historical periods. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 157–168.
2.
BaxterL. A., & MontgomeryB. M. (1996). Relating. Dialogues & Dialectics.New York: Guilford.
3.
BenzecriJ. P. (1976). L'analyse des Données, vol. 2. L'Analyse des Correspondances.Paris: Dunod.
4.
BreakwellG. (2001). Social representational constraints upon identity processes. In DeauxK. & PhilogèneG. (Eds.), Representations of the social.Oxford: Blackwell.
5.
BreakwellG., & CanterD. V., (Eds.) (1993). Empirical approaches to social representations.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BrewerM. (1991). The social self. On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 476–482.
7.
BrewerM. B., & RoccasS. (2001). Individual values, social identity and optimal distinctiveness. In SedikidesC. & BrewerM. B. (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self.New York: Taylor & Francis.
8.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In TriandisH. C. & BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, vol. 2—Methodology (pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
BrunerJ. (2001). Self-making and world-making. In BrockmeierJ. & CarbaughD. (Eds.), Narrative and identity. Studies in Autobiography, self and culture.Amsterdam: Benjamin's (or. ed. 1991).
BrunerJ., & FeldmanC. (1996). Group narrative as a cultural context of autobiography. In RubinD. (Ed.), Remembering our past. Studies in autobiographical memory.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
LauweM. J. Chombart de (1971). Un monde autre: L'enfance. De ses représentations à son mythe [Another world: Childhood. From its representations to its myth]. Paris: Payot.
15.
ChryssochoouX. (2002). Identity as a social representration of the Self: A present construction of social context bridging past and future. Paper presented at athe 6th International Conference on Social Representations “Thinking Societies: Common Sense and Communication.” Stirling, Scotland, 27th August-1st September.
16.
ContarelloA. (1996). Social Psychology and literature. An overview of the use of literary texts in social psychology and related disciplines. Unpublished paper.
17.
ContarelloA. (2002). Identities, representations and literary texts. Paper presented at the 13° General Meeting of EAESP. San Sebastian, Spain, June 26-29, 2002
18.
ContarelloA.GargioniM., & MazzottaA. (2003). Individuals in Societies: The potential of literary text analysis for societal psychology. In LaszloJ. & WagnerW. (Eds.), Theories and controversies in social psychology.Budapest, Hungary: New Mandate.
19.
ContarelloA., & VolpatoC. (1991). Images of friendship: Literary depictions through the ages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 49–75.
20.
ContarelloA., & VolpatoC. (2002). Social representations, narrative and literary texts. In LaszloJ. & RogersW. Stainton (Eds.), Narrative approaches in social psychology.Budapest: New Mandate.
21.
DeauxK. (2000). Models, meanings and motivations. In CapozzaD. and BrownR. (Eds.), Social identity processes (pp. 1–14). London: Sage.
22.
DeauxK., & PhilogèneG., (Eds.) (2001). Representations of the social.Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
DhawanN.RosemanI. J.NaiduR. K., & RettekS. I. (1995). Self-concepts across two cultures. India and the US. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 606–621.
24.
DoiseW. (1998). Social representations in personal identity. In WorchelS.MoralesJ. F.PàezD., & DeschampsJ-C. (Eds.), Social identity. International perspectives.London: Sage.
25.
DuveenG. (2001). Representations, identities, resistance. In DeauxK. & PhilogèneG. (Eds.), Representations of the social.Oxford: Blackwell.
26.
DuveenG. & LloydB. (1986). The significance of social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 219–230.
27.
FlickU., (Ed.) (1998). The psychology of the social.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GergenK. J. (1987). Towards self as relationships. In YardleyK. & HonessT. (Eds.), Self and identity. Psychosocial perspectives.New York: Wiley.
29.
GergenK. J. (1989). Warranting voice and the elaboration. In GergenK. J. & ShotterJ. (Eds.), Texts of identity.London: Sage.
30.
GergenK. J. (1991). The saturated self.New York: Basic Books.
31.
GergenK. J. (1994). Realities and relationships. Soundings in social construction.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
GergenK. J. (1995). Culture and Self in postmodern psychology: Dialogue in trouble?Culture & Psychology, 1, 147–159.
33.
GergenK. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction.London: Sage.
34.
GergenK. J., & GergenM. (1988). Narrative and the self as relationships. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, New York: Academic Press.
35.
GergenM. M. (1994). The social construction of personal histories: Gendered lives in popular autobiographies. In SarbinT. R. & KitsuseJ. I. (Eds.), Constructing the social.London: Sage.
36.
GoldbergL. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.
37.
HigginsE.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy. A theory relating Self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
38.
HollandD., & QuinnN., (Eds.) (1987). Cultural models in language and thought.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
JodeletD. (1984). Représentations sociales: Phénomenes, concept et théorie. In MoscoviciS. (ed.), Psychologie sociale.Paris: PUF.
40.
KaësR. (1989). Psychanalyse et représentation sociale. In JodeletD. (Ed.), Les représentations sociales.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
41.
KitayamaS.MarkusH. R., & MatsumotoH. (1995). Culture, Self, and emotion: A cultural perspective on “Self-conscious” emotions. In TangneyJ. P. & FisherK. W. (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions. The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment and pride.New York: Guilford.
42.
LalljeeM., & AngelovaR. (1995). Person description in India, Britain, and Bulgaria. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 645–657.
43.
LászlóJ. (2002). Narrative organization of social representations. In LászlóJ. & RogersW. Stainton (Eds.), Narrative approaches in social psychology.Budapest: New Mandate.
44.
LebartL.MorineauA.BecueM. E. & HaeuslerL. (1989). Systeme portable pour l'analyse des données textuelle (SPAD.T) [Portable system for the analysis of textual data]. Paris: Cesia.
45.
MarkusH. R., & KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological-Review, 98, 224–253.
46.
MarkusH. R., & PlautV. C. (2001). Social representations: Catching a good idea. In DeauxK. & PhilogèneG. (Eds.), Representations of the social.Oxford: Blackwell.
47.
McAdamsD. P. (1985). The ‘Imago.’ A key narrative component of identity. In ShaverP. (Ed.), Self, situations and social behaviour.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
48.
MenonU., & ShwederR. A. (1994). Kali's tongue: Cultural psychology and the power of shame in Orissa, India. In KitayamaS. & MarkusH. R. (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence.Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
49.
MillerJ. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 46, 961–978.
50.
MisraG. (2001). Culture and Self: Implications for psychological inquiry. Journal of Indian Psychology, 19, 1–20.
51.
MontgomeryB. M., & BaxterL. A., (Eds.) (1998). Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships.London: Erlbaum.
52.
MoscoviciS. (1961/76). La psychanalyse. Son image et son public [Psychoanalysis: Its image and its public]. Paris: Press Universitaires de France.
53.
MoscoviciS. (1986). The Dreyfus affaire, Proust, and social psychology. Social Research, 53, 23–56.
54.
OatleyK. (1992). Best laid schemes.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
OatleyK., & Johnson-LairdP. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 29–50.
56.
OysermanD., & MarkusH. R. (1998). Self as social representation. In FlickU. (Ed.), The psychology of the social.London: Sage.
57.
PotterJ. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
PotterJ.StringerP., & WetherellM. (1984). Social texts and contexts. Literature and social psychology.London: Routledge.
59.
PotterJ., & WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour.London: Sage.
60.
RadhakrishnanP., & ChanD. K. S. (1997). Cultural differences in the relation between self-discrepancy and life satisfaction. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 387–398.
61.
RolandA. (1987). In search of Self in India and Japan. Towards a cross-cultural psychology.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
62.
RosenbergS. (1988). Self and others: Studies in social personality and autobiography. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 57–95). New York: Academic Press.
63.
RosenbergS. (1988a). Personality and affect: A quantitative approach and comparison. In MartindaleC. (Ed.), Psychological approaches to the study of literary narratives.Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
64.
RosenbergS. (1997). Multiplicity of selves. In AshmoreR. D. & JussimL. (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues.New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
RosenbergS., & JonesR. (1972). A method for investigating and representing a person's implicit theory of personality: Theodore Dreiser's view of people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 372–386.
ShwederR. A., & BourneE. J. (1982). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In MarsellaA. J. & WhiteG. M. (Eds.), Cultural conceptions of mental health and therapy (re-printed in ShwederR. A., 1991, Thinking through cultures. Expeditions in cultural psychology.Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
68.
SmithS. H., & WhiteheadG. I. (1984). Attributions for promotion and demotion in the United States and India. The Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 27–34.
69.
TakanoY., & OsakaE. (1999). A unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the U.S. on individualism/collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 311–341.
70.
TriandisH. C. (1978). Some universals of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 1–16.
71.
TriandisH. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In BermanJ. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
72.
VermaJ. (1985). The ingroup and its relevance to individual behaviour: A study of collectivism and individualism. Psychologia, An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 28, 173–181.
73.
VolpatoC., & ContarelloA. (1995). Relations personnelles et culture: Une analyse de texts littéraires [Personal relationships and culture: An analysis of literary texts]. Social Science Informations, 34, 205–224.
74.
VolpatoC., & ContarelloA. (1999). Towards a social psychology of extreme situations: Primo Levi's If This is a Man and social identity theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 239–258.
75.
ZavalloniM. (2001). E-motional memory and the identity system: Its interplay with representations of the social world. In DeauxK. & PhilogèneG. (Eds.), Representations of the social.Oxford: Blackwell.
