Potential impacts of large-scale educational telecommunications systems are identified and issues to be considered in a more formal technology assessment are discussed. Educational telecommunications systems involving television, computer-aided instruction, and information resource sharing are in various stages of planning and implementation. However, relatively little work has been performed to assess both short- and long-term impacts of such systems on education, society and the individual. Potential impact areas include: impacts on education; economic impacts; political and legal impacts; social, psychological and cultural impacts; physical and environmental impacts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MorganR. P.SinghJ. P.RothenbergD. and RobinsonB. E., “Large-Scale Educational Telecommunications Systems for the U.S.: An Analysis of Educational Needs and Technological Opportunities,” Memorandum No. CG 75/1, (411 pp.) Center for Development Technology, Washington University, St. Louis, 1975.
2.
RobinsonB., “A Delphi Forecast of Technology in Education,” M. A. Thesis, Program in Technology and Human Affairs, Washington University, Report No. (R)T-73/l, (129 pp.) August, 1973.
3.
“The Fourth Revolution: Instructional Technology in Higher Education,”Report of the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, McGraw-Hill Publ. Co., Hightstown, N.J., 1972.
4.
DoyleF. and GoodwillD., “An Exploration of the Future of Educational Technology,” Bell-Canada Report, 1971.
5.
BogatzG. A. and BallS., “The Second Year of Sesame Street: A Continuing Evaluation,”I and II, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J., 1971.
6.
BallS. and BogatzG. A., “A Summary of the Major Findings from Reading with Television: An Evaluation of the Electric Company,”Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J., March, 1973.
7.
WongM. D., “The Role of Technology in Non-Traditional Higher Education,” M.S. Thesis, Program in Technology and Human Affairs, Washington University, Report No. (R)T-74/3, (307 pp.) August, 1974.
8.
BitzerD. and SkaperdasD., “The Design of an Economically Viable Large-Scale Computer Based Education System,” CERL Report X-5, University of Illinois, Urbana, Feb., 1969.
9.
BondesonC. V., “The TICCIT Project: Design Strategy for Educational Innovation,” in Proceedings of Conference on Productivity in Higher Education, State University of New York, Stony Brook, Sept., 1973.
10.
GraysonL. P., “Educational Satellites: The ATS-6 Experiments,” in The Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 3: 2, pp. 89–123, Fall, 1974.
11.
GreenbergerM. W., “Computer and Information Networks,”Science, 282: 4107, pp. 29–35, Oct. 5, 1973.
12.
RobinsonB. E. and MorganR. P., “A Delphi Forecast of Technology in Education With Implications for Educational Satellite Development,” paper prepared for 4th Annual National Educational Technology Conference, San Francisco, California, March, 1974.
13.
LipmanD., “Technology in the Public Schools?,” Memorandum 73/6 (95 pp.) Center for Development Technology, Washington University, St. Louis, Dec, 1973.
14.
JohnsonR. C.III, “Telecommunications Technology and the Socialization of Black Americans: Issues, Concerns and Possibilities,” M. A. Thesis, Program in Technology and Human Affairs, Report THA 74/7, (480 pp.) Sept., 1974.
15.
MorganR. P.SinghJ. P.OhlmanH. M. and DuMolinJ. R., “Application of Communications Satellites to Educational Development: An Overview of the Washington University Program,” in Proceedings of Colloque International—Les Satellites d'Education, Centre National D'Etudes Spatiales, 32 pp., Nice, France, 1971.
16.
MorganR. P.SinghJ. P.AndersonB. D. and GreenbergE., “Satellites for U.S. Education: Needs, Opportunities and Systems,” in Communications Satellite Systems, BargelliniP. L., (ed.), pp. 441–480, MIT Press, 1974.
17.
MorganR. P. and SinghJ. P., “Satellite Utilization for Educational Communications in the United States,” in The Second Fifteen Years in Space, 31, American Astronautical Society, Tarzana, California, 1973.
18.
WalkmeyerJ.MorganR. P. and SinghJ. P., “Market Scenarios and Alternative Administrative Frameworks for Educational Satellite Systems,” Memorandum No. CG-75/2, (161 pp.) Center for Development Technology, Washington University, St. Louis, April, 1975.
19.
CoatesJ. F., in Foreword to “A Comparative State-of-the-Art Review of Selected U.S. Technology Assessment Studies,” by JonesM. V., Mitre Corporation, May, 1973.
20.
WalkmeyerJ., “Planning Alternative Organizational Frameworks for a Large Scale Educational Telecommunications System Served by Fixed/Broadcast Satellites,” Memorandum No. 73/3, (112 pp.) Center for Development Technology, Washington University, June, 1973.
21.
“Public Broadcasting and Education,”A Report to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting from the Advisory Council of National Organizations, 888 16th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20006, March, 1975.
22.
ColemanJ. S., “Education in Modern Society,” in Computers, Communications and the Public Interest, GreenbergerM., (ed.), Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.
23.
For definitions of “cost-effectiveness” and “cost-benefit” analysis as applied to education, see GraysonL. P., Science, 175, pp. 1216–1222, 1972.
24.
ChuG. C. and SchrammW., “Learning from Television: What the Research Says,”Stanford University, Institute for Communications Research, 1967.
25.
JamisonD.SuppesP. and WellsS., “The Effectiveness of Alternative Instructional Media: A Survey,” Research Paper No. 110, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Feb., 1973.
JacksonO. A., “Impacts of PPBS in Educational Management,” Report No. THA 74/2, Program in Technology and Human Affairs, Washington University, St. Louis, Jan., 1974.
28.
DuMolinJ. R. and MorganR. P., “An Instructional Satellite System for the United States: Preliminary Considerations,” Memorandum IM-71/2, (36 pp.) Center for Development Technology, Washington University, July, 1971.
29.
MoldenV., “Telecommunications and Black Americans: A Survey of Ownership, Participation and Control,” M.A. Thesis, Program in Technology and Human Affairs, Washington University, St. Louis, Report No. R(T) 75/2, (708 pp.), August, 1975.
30.
AndersonB. D. and GreenbergE., “Educational Production Functions for Teacher-Technology Mixes: Problems and Possibilities,” Memorandum 72/2, (96 pp.) Center for Development Technology, Washington University, March, 1972.
31.
MorrisA. J., “Final Report on Cost Effectiveness of Continuing Engineering Studies by Television,” Report prepared for Continuing Engineering Studies Division, American Society for Engineering Education, May, 1974.
32.
LiebermanD. L. and MorganR. P., “Privacy Impacts of Educational Telecommunications and Information Systems,” Memorandum No. CG 75/3, (22 pp.) Center for Development Technology, Washington University, St. Louis, August, 1974.
33.
MillerA. R., “The Assault on Privacy,”Signet, New York, 1971.
34.
MacyJ. R., “To Improve a Wasteland,”Quantum Books, Berkeley, 1974.
35.
MilgramS. and ShotlandL., Television and Antisocial Behavior, Academic Press, N.Y., 1973.
36.
MitzelH., in MillerA. R., “The Assault on Privacy,”Signet, New York, p. 136, 1971.
37.
PerrineJ. R., “Telecommunications Technology and Rural Education in the U.S.,” M.A. Thesis, Program in Technology and Human Affairs, Washington University, St. Louis, Report R(T)-75/l, (269 pp.), March, 1975.
38.
SchillerH., “Mass Communications and American Empire,”Beacon Press, 1972.
39.
“Satellites Zap Radio Astronomers,”Astronomy, 2, 10, p. 49, Oct., 1974.
40.
SinghJ. P., “Electromagnetic Pollution in the Earth's Environment and Communication Satellites,” Unpublished Memorandum, Center for Development Technology, Washington University, 1973.
41.
AmaraR., “Toward Understanding the Social Impact of Computers,” Report R-29, Institute for the Future, Menlo Park, California, May, 1974.
42.
“IEEE Transactions on Communications: Special Issue on Social Implications of Telecommunications,”Volume COM-23, No. 10, Oct. 1975.
