Learner analysis and needs assessments are basic elements of all instructional design models and are of concern to those designing distance education courses. Mismatches between students' expectations and actual course features may impact learning. This investigation surveyed 249 geographically dispersed online students for the course features they valued and the course features included in their distance education courses. Results revealed general agreement between course features desired by students and those included in their current courses, however, there were mismatches; particularly concerning the use of instant messaging, team assignments, and creating biography pages. Implications for online course design are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArbaughJ. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in Web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 42–54.
BernardR. M.AbramiP. C.LouY.BorokhovskiE.WadeA.WozneyL.WalletP. A.FisetM., & HuangB. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 370–439.
4.
BurtonJ. K., & MerrillP. F. (1991). Needs assessment: Goals, needs, and priorities. In BriggsL. J.GustafsonK. L., & TillmanM. H. (Eds.), Instructional design: Principles and applications (2nd ed., pp. 17–43). Englewood, Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
5.
ChristensenE. W.AnakweU. P., & KesslerE. H. (2001). Receptivity to distance learning: The effect of technology, reputation, constraints, and learning preferences. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3), 263–279.
6.
DabbaghN. (2003). Scaffolding: An important teacher competency in online learning. TechTrends, 47(2), 39–44.
7.
DickW., & CareyL. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
8.
DugganA.HessB.MorganD.KimS., & WilsonK. (1999). Measuring students' attitude toward educational use of the Internet. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 429 117.)
9.
EastmondD. (2000). Enabling student accomplishment online: An overview of factors for success in Web-based distance education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 343–358.
10.
FrankenJ. E. (2002). Web-enhanced curriculum in higher education. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 15(1), 15–18.
11.
FreyA.FaulA., & YankelovP. (2003). Student perceptions of Web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of Social Work Education, 39(3), 443–457.
12.
HerringtonJ.OliverR., & ReevesT. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59–71.
13.
HuangH. M. (2002). Student perceptions in an online mediated environment. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(4), 405–422.
14.
JiangM., & TingE. (1999). A study of students' perceived learning in a Web-based online environment. Paper presented at WebNet 99 World Conference, Honolulu, HI. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 448 721.)
15.
LimC. P. (2004). Engaging learners in online learning environments. TechTrends, 48(4), 16–23.
16.
MaushakN. J., & EllisK. A. (2003). Attitudes of graduate students toward mixed-medium distance education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(2), 129–141.
17.
MorrisonG. R.RossS. M., & KempJ. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th Edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
18.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003, July). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000–2001. (NCES Number: 2003017.) Retrieved March 9, 2004 from Postsecondary Education Quick Information system: http://www.nces.ed.gov/surveys/peqis/publications/2003017/.
19.
NorthrupP.LeeR., & BurgessV. (2002). Learner perceptions of online interaction. Paper presented at ED-MEDIA 2002 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Denver, CO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 477 075.)
20.
Ortiz-RodriquezM.TelgR. W.IraniT.RobertsT. G., & RhoadesE. (2005). College students' perceptions of quality in distance education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(2), 97–105.
21.
PachnowskiL. M., & JurczykJ. P. (2000). Correlating self-directed learning with distance learning success. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Clearwater, FL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 441 000.)
22.
ReigeluthC. M. (Ed). (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
RossettA. (1999). Analysis for human performance technology. In StolovitchH. D. & KeepsE. J. (Eds.), Handbook of performance technology: Improving individual and organizational performance worldwide (pp. 139–162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
24.
SchrammR. M.WagnerR. J., & WernerJ. M. (2000). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of web-based courses. Distance Education Report, 3(18), 1–3.
25.
SmithJ. A. (2003). The establishment of basic computer proficiency guidelines for students entering online courses (Doctoral dissertation, Robert Morris University, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 2687.
26.
StewartB. L.WaightC. L.NorwoodM. M., & EzellS. D. (2004). Formative and summative evaluation of online courses. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(2), 101–109.
27.
SwanK.SheaP.FredericksenE.PickettA.PeltzW., & MaherG. (2000). Building knowledge communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 359–383.
28.
TabatabaeiM.SchrottnerB., & ReichgeltH. (2006). Target populations for online education. International Journal on E-learning, 5(3), 401–414.
29.
VoleryT. (2001). Online education: An exploratory study into success factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(1), 77–92.
30.
WagnerE. D. (1993). Variables affecting distance educational program success. Educational Technology, 33(4), 28–32.
31.
WaschullS. B. (2001). The online delivery of psychology courses: Attrition, performance and evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, 28(2), 143–147.
32.
WindschitlM. (1998). The WWW and classroom research: What path should we take?Educational Researcher, 27(1), 28–33.
33.
WitkinB. R., & AltschuldJ. W. (1995). Planning and conducting needs assessments: A practical guide.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
