This article suggests using social network theory to explain the varieties of mourning behavior in different societies. This context is used to compare the participation in funeral ceremonies of members of different social circles in modern-American society and in the Israeli kibbutz. The two cases demonstrate the validity of concepts deriving from social network analysis in the study of bereavement, mourning behavior, and funerary practice. The approach suggested might serve as a basis for a cross-cultural analysis of the range of participation in mourning rituals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RileyJ. W., What People Think about Death, in The Dying Patient, BrimO. F.FreemanH. E.LevineL.ScotchA. (eds.), Russel Sage Foundation, New York, pp. 221–224, 1970.
2.
BlaunerR., Death and Social Structure, Psychiatry, 29, pp. 378–394, 1966.
3.
ParsonsT., Death in American Society: A Brief Working Paper, The American Behavioral Scientist, 6, pp. 61–65, 1963.
4.
ParsonsT.LidzV., Death in American Society, in Essays in Self Destruction, ShneidermanE. (ed.), Science House, New York, pp. 135–170, 1967.
5.
MitfordJ., The American Way of Death, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1963.
6.
HarmerR., The High Cost of Dying, Crowell-Collier and Macmillan, New York, 1963.
7.
BowmanL., The American Funeral: A Study of Guilt Extravagance and Sublimity, Public Affairs Press, Washington, D.C., 1959.
8.
VernonG. M., Sociology of Death, Ronald, New York, 1970.
9.
DumontR. G.FossD. C., The American View of Death: Acceptance or Denial?, Schenkman, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1972.
10.
BeckerE., The Denial of Death, Free Press, New York, 1973.
11.
HuntingtonR.MetcalfB., Celebrations of Death: The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979.
12.
BarelyS. R., The Codes of Death: The Semiotics of Funeral Work, Urban Life, 12, pp. 3–31, 1983.
13.
LienhardtG., The Situation of Death: An Aspect of Anuak Philosophy, Anthropological Quarterly, 35, pp. 74–85, 1962.
14.
HertzR., A Contribution to the Study of Collective Representation of Death, in Death and the Right Hand, Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, pp. 27–86, 1960 (first published in 1907).
15.
Van GennepA., The Rites of Passage, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1960 (first published in 1909).
16.
The Cost of the Funeral, The Boston Globe, January 17, 1983.
17.
The Jewish Way of Death, Baltimore Jewish Times, May 11, 1979.
18.
MitchellJ. C. (ed.), Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1969.
19.
BottE., Family and Social Network, Tavistock, London, 1957.
20.
BottE., Family and Social Network (2nd Ed., with a preface by Max Gluckman), Tavistock, London, 1971.
21.
BarnesT. A., Class and Committees in a Northern Norwegian Island Parish, Human Relations, 7, pp. 39–58, 1954.
22.
FischerC., To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982.
23.
KnokeD.KulinskiJ. H., Network Analysis, Sage, Beverly Hills, 1982.
24.
HallmanH. W., Neighborhood: Their Place in Urban Life, Sage, Beverly Hills, 1984.
25.
GottliebB. H. (ed.), Social Networks and Social Support, Sage, Beverly Hills, 1981.
26.
ArgyleM.HendersonM., The Anatomy of Relationships, Heinemann, London, 1985.
27.
McCubbinH. I.CaubleA. E.PattersonT. M. (eds.), Family Stress, Coping and Social Support, Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1982.
28.
EpsteinA. L., The Network and Urban Social Organization, The Rhodes-Livingstone Institute Journal, 29, pp. 29–61, 1961.
29.
VolkartE. H.MichaelS. T., Bereavement and Mental Health, in Death and Identity, FultonR. (ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 272–293, 1965.
30.
KephartW. M., Status after Death, American Sociological Review, 15, pp. 635–643, 1950.
31.
TurnerR. E.EdgeleyC., Death as a Theatre: A Dramaturgical Analysis of the American Funeral, Sociology and Social Research, 60, pp. 377–392, 1976.
32.
BradfieldC. D.MyersA. A., Clergy and Funeral Directors: An Explication in Role Conflict, Review of Religious Research, 21, pp. 343–350, 1980.
33.
FultonR., The Clergyman and the Funeral Director, Social Forces, 13, pp. 317–321, 1961.
34.
ChukwukereI., A Coffin for the “Loved One”: The Structure of Fante Death Rituals, Current Anthropology, 22, pp. 61–68, 1981.
35.
SaugreeW. H., Response, Current Anthropology, 22, p. 68, 1981.
36.
SudnowD., Passing On: The Social Organization of Dying, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1967.
37.
LitwakE., Occupational Mobility and Family Cohesion, American Sociological Review, 25, pp. 9–21, 1960.
38.
LitwakE., Geographical Mobility and Family Cohesion, American Sociological Review, 25, pp. 385–394, 1960.
39.
AikenA.GoldbergD., Social Mobility and Kinship: A Reexamination of the Hypothesis, American Anthropologist, 71, pp. 261–270, 1969.
40.
MirandeA. M., The Isolated Nuclear Family Hypothesis: A Reanalysis, in The Family and Change, EdwardsJ. H. (ed.), Knopf, New York, pp. 153–163, 1969.
41.
WhiteW. H., The Organization Man, Doubleday, New York, 1957.
42.
RubinN., Personal Bereavement in a Collective Environment: Mourning in the Kibbutz, Advances in Thanatology, 5, pp. 9–22, 1982.
43.
RubinN., Death Customs in a Non-Religious Kibbutz: The Use of Sacred Symbols in a Secular Society, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 25, pp. 292–303, 1986.
The Babylonian Talmud, Moed Katan, The Soncino Press, London, 1935.
46.
Talmon-GarberY., The Kibbutz: Sociological Studies, Magnes Press, Jerusalem (Hebrew), 1970.
47.
WilliamsM. D., On the Street Where I Lived, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1981.
48.
LemingM.DickinsonG. E. (eds.), Understanding Dying, Death and Bereavement, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1985.
49.
RubinN., A Sociological Analysis of Jewish Mourning Patterns in the Mishnaic and Talmudic Periods, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan (Hebrew), 1977.
50.
RubinN., Unofficial Memorial Rites in an Army Unit, Social Forces, 63, pp. 795–809, 1985.
