Recent psycholinguistic research has challenged the view that English speakers interpret the male pronouns and the generic man as words that refer to both males and females. The suggested ambiguity of these terms is of concern to technical communicators because it can affect the accuracy of their messages. Since guidelines for avoiding sex ambiguity in language are not generally available in technical writing or speech manuals, this article offers simple devices for eliminating the generic use of male pronouns and man. It also provides alternate terms for common sex-biased expressions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MartynaW., The Psychology of the Generic Masculine, in Women and Language in Literature and Society, McConnell-GinetS.BorkerR., and FurmanN. (eds.), Praeger Publishers, New York, pp. 69–78, 1980.
2.
Guidelines to Ensure Sex Fairness in Education Division Communications and Products, Sex Fairness in Educational Division Communications, Products and Dissemination Strategies, National Advisory Council on Women's Educational Programs, Washington, D. C., pp. 27–38, November 1977.
3.
MillerC. and SwiftK., The Handbook of Nonsexist Writing for Writers, Editors and Speakers, Lippincott and Crowell, New York, 1980.
4.
FoersterL., Regardless of Sex: Toward Communication Free of Sexual Bias, in Without BIAS: A Guidebook for Nondiscriminatory Communication, 2nd edition, PickensJ. E. (ed.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 23–44, 1982.
5.
The Last Frontier: Changing One's Language, Alaskan Sex Equity in Education News, 2: 3, 1983.
6.
FrankFrancine and AnshenFrank, Language and the Sexes, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1983.
7.
MunterMary, Avoiding Sexism on the Job: A Test for Bias-Free Writing and Speaking, in Without BIAS: A Guidebook for Nondiscriminatory Communication, 2nd edition, PickensJudy E. (ed.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 89–95, 1982.
