The Virtual Math Teams Project is exploring how to create, structure, support, and assess an online chat-based collaborative community devoted to mathematics discourse. It is analyzing the forms of group cognition that emerge from the use of shared cognitive tools with specific functionalities. Centered on a case study of a synchronous online interchange, this article discusses the use of a graphical referencing tool in coordination with text chat to achieve a group orientation to a particular mathematical object in a shared whiteboard. Deictic referencing is seen to be a critical foundation of intersubjective cognitive processes that index objects of shared attention. The case study suggests that cognitive tools to support group referencing can be important to supporting group alignment, intentionality, and cognition in online communities such as this one for collaborative mathematics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarronB. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS), 12(3), 307–359.
2.
CakirM.XhafaF.ZhouN., & StahlG. (2005). Thread-based analysis of patterns of collaborative interaction in chat. Paper presented at the international conference on AI in Education (AI-Ed 2005), Amsterdam, Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/pub/aied2005.pdf
3.
ClarkH., & BrennanS. (1991). Grounding in communication. In ResnickL.LevineJ., & TeasleyS. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially-shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: APA.
4.
DescartesR. (1633/1999). Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy. New York: Hackett.
5.
DillenbourgP., & TraumD. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121–151.
6.
FischerG.NakakojiK.OstwaldJ.StahlG., & SumnerT. (1998). Embedding critics in design environments. In MayburyM. T. & WahlsterW. (Eds.), Readings in intelligent user interfaces (pp. 537–561). New York: Morgan Kaufman. Retrieved from http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/gerry/publications/journals/ker/index.html
7.
FuksH.PimentelM., & de LucenaC. J. P. (2006). R-u-typing-2-me? Evolving a chat tool to increase understanding in learning activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 1(1). D.O.I.: [10.1007/s11412–006–6845–3]. Retrieved from http://ijcscl.org/_preprints/volume1_issue1/fuks_pimentel_lucena.pdf
8.
GarciaA., & JacobsJ. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(4), 337–367.
9.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.
HeideggerM. (1927/1996). Being and time: A translation of Sein und Zeit (StambaughJ., Trans.). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
11.
HusserlE. (1929/1960). Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology (CairnsD., Trans.). The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
12.
JonesC.Dirckinck-HolmfeldL., & LindströmB. (2006). A relational, indirect and meso level approach to design in CSCL in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (ijCSCL), 1(1). D.O.I.: [10.1007/s11412–006–6841–7]. Retrieved fromhttp://ijcscl.org/_preprints/volume1_issue1/jones_holmfeld_lindstroem.pdf
13.
KrauseE. (1986). Taxicab geometry: An adventure in non-Euclidean geometry. New York: Dover.
14.
LakoffG., & NúñezR. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
15.
LernerG. (1993). Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text, 13(2), 213–245.
16.
MühlpfordtM., & WessnerM. (2005). Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning. Paper presented at the international conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2005), Taipei, Taiwan.
17.
NancyJ.-L. (2000). Being singular plural (RichardsonR., Trans.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
RoschelleJ., & TeasleyS. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In O'MalleyC. (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–197). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
19.
SacksH.SchegloffE. A., & JeffersonG. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. Retrieved from www.jstor.org
20.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
StarS. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In GasserL. & HuhnsM. N. (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 37–54). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
26.
VygotskyL. (1930/1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
