The characteristics of students taking programming-oriented and applications-oriented higher education courses are compared. Relative to the latter students, the former students' personalities are shown to be of a more schizoid nature, this providing an explanation of these students' greater computer engagement, programming experience and computing aptitude, at least as far as males are concerned. The extent to which programming experience is accumulated by females is concluded to be a major factor explaining the greater gender imbalance in enrolment on the programming-oriented course. Psychometric measures are found to be useful over and above cheaper, more easily obtainable, information in discriminating between the two types of student. However, psychometric measures are not found useful in increasing the association between correctness of course classification subsequent to Discriminant Function Analysis and success/failure on the courses. Finally, the same set of characteristics, involving among other things, greater involvement in computing, is found to be associated with success irrespective of course.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LockheedM. E., Women, Girls, and Computers: A First Look at the Evidence, Sex Roles, 13: 3/4, pp. 115–122, 1985.
2.
ChenM., Gender and Computers: The Beneficial Effects of Experience on Attitudes, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2: 3, pp. 265–282, 1986.
3.
TempleL. and LipsH. M., Gender Differences and Similarities in Attitudes toward Computers, Computers in Human Behavior, 5: 4, pp. 215–226, 1989.
4.
TurkleS. and PapertS., Epistomological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture, in In Search of Gender Free Paradigms for Computer Science Education, MartinC. D. and Murchie-BeymaE. (eds.), International Society for Technology in Education, Eugene, 1992.
5.
BuschT., Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12: 2, pp. 147–158, 1995.
6.
JonesT. and ClarkeV. A., Diversity as a Determinant of Attitudes: A Possible Explanation of the Apparent Advantage of Single-Sex Settings, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12: 1, pp. 51–64, 1995.
7.
ShottonM. A., Computer Addiction?: A Study of Computer Dependency, Taylor and Francis, London, 1989.
8.
CharltonJ. P. and BirkettP. E., The Development and Validation of the Computer Apathy and Anxiety Scale, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13: 1, pp. 41–59, 1995.
9.
FoxallG. R. and BhateS., Psychology of Computer Use: XIX. Extent of Computer Use: Relationships with Adaptive-Innovative Cognitive Style and Personal Involvement in Computing, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, pp. 195–202, 1992.
10.
ReberA. S., The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1985.
11.
CharltonJ. P., The Influence of Cognitive and Affective Factors on the Acquisition of a First Computer Programming Language, unpublished M.Phil, thesis, Bolton Institute of Higher Education, 1992.
12.
CannonW. M. and PerryD. K., A Vocational Interest Scale for Computer Programmers, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Computer Personnel Research Conference of the ACM, pp. 61–82, 1966.
13.
SavilleP. and BlinkhornS., British Undergraduate Norms to the 16PF (Forms A & B), NFER, Windsor, 1976.
14.
EntwistleN., Styles of Learning and Teaching, Fulton, London, 1983.
15.
KrugS. E., Interpreting 16PF Profile Patterns, Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Champaign, 1981.
16.
KlineP., Personality: The Psychometric View, Routledge, London, 1993.
17.
PociusK. E., Personality Factors in Human-Computer Interaction: A Review of the Literature, Computers in Human Behavior, 7, pp. 103–135, 1991.
18.
CattellR. B.EberH. W., and TatsuokaM. M., Handbook for the 16PF, Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Champaign, 1970.
19.
EysenckH. J., The Biological Basis of Personality, C. C. Thomas, Springfield, 1967.
20.
MiuraI. T., The Relationship of Computer Self-Efficacy Expectations to Computer Interest and Course Enrollment in College, Sex Roles, 16: 5/6, pp. 303–311, 1987.
21.
MohamedaliM. H.MesserD. J., and FletcherB. (C)., Factors Affecting Microcomputer Use and Programming Ability of Secondary School Children, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 3, pp. 224–239, 1987.
22.
CulleyL., Girls, Boys and Computers, Educational Studies, 14: 1, pp. 3–8, 1988.
23.
OmanP. W., Identifying Student Characteristics Influencing Success in Introductory Computer Science Courses, AEDS Journal, 19: Winter/Spring, pp. 226–233, 1986.
24.
Science Research Associates, Computer Programmer Aptitude Battery Examiner's Manual, Science Research Associates, Chicago, 1985.
25.
AikenL. R., Psychological Testing and Assessment (6th Edition), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1988.
26.
KrugS. E. and JohnsE. F., A Large Scale Cross-Validation of Second-Order Personality Structure Defined by the 16PF, Psychological Reports, 29, pp. 683–693, 1986.
27.
TabachnickB. G. and FidellL. S., Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd Edition), HarperCollins, New York, 1996.
28.
FergusonG. A., Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education (5th Edition), McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1988.
29.
PharesE. J., Introduction to Personality (3rd Edition), HarperCollins, New York, 1991.
30.
GeisF. L., Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: A Social Psychological View of Gender, in The Psychology of Gender, BeallA. E. and SternbergR. J. (eds.), Guilford, New York, 1993.
31.
DurndellA.GlissovP., and SiannG., Gender and Computing: Persisting Differences, Educational Research, 37: 3, pp. 219–227, 1995.
32.
GlissovP., Social and Motivational Aspects of Secondary School Pupils' Computer Use, with Particular Reference to the Gender Issue, unpublished PhD thesis, Glasgow Polytechnic, 1992.
33.
KellyG. A., The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Vol. 1, Norton, New York, 1955.
34.
PotterJ. and WetherellM., Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour, Sage, London, 1987.
35.
SiannG.DurndellA.MacLeodH., and GlissovP., Stereotyping in Relation to the Gender Gap in Participation in Computing, Educational Research, 30: 2, pp. 98–103, 1988.
