This research examined age and sex variations in moral judgment processes across the life-span, primarily using objective questionnaire techniques. Both stage level of judgment and patterns of requests for further information following dilemma presentation were studied in 242 respondents, ages fourteen to ninety-two, in order to measure individual differences in judgment orientations hypothesized by Gilligan and suggested by theorists of aging. There were few indications of sex differences in either stage or patterns of information-seeking, except for a generally greater preference for additional information in decision-making by women. With respect to age trends, participants over age seventy-five scored at significantly lower stage levels than younger adult groups. However, elderly adults' judgments did not appear simply “regressed” to earlier developmental levels. On both objective and open-ended measures, older participants seemed more likely than younger groups to assimilate moral dilemma information to their own general cognitive frameworks, consistent with an hypothesis of greater synthesis in judgment among the elderly.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KohlbergL., Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive Developmental Approach, in Moral Development and Behavior, LickonaT. (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, NY, 1976.
2.
GibbsJ.ArnoldK., and BurkhartJ., Sex Differences in the Expression of Moral Judgment, Child Development, 55, pp. 1040–1043, 1984.
3.
GilliganC., In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.
4.
KohlbergL., Stages and Aging in Moral Development: Some Speculations, The Gerontologist, 13, pp. 497–502, 1973.
5.
GilliganC., In a Different Voice: Women's Conceptions of Self and Morality, Harvard Educational Review, 47, pp. 481–517, 1977.
6.
GilliganC.LangdaleS.LyonsN., and MurphyJ., The Contributions of Women's Thought to Developmental Theory, Final Report to the National Institute of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1982.
7.
BrabeckM., Moral Judgment: Theory and Research on Differences Between Males and Females, Developmental Review, 3, pp. 274–291, 1983.
8.
RestJ., Development in Judging Moral Issues, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 1979.
9.
WalkerL., Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review, Child Development, 55, pp. 677–691, 1984.
10.
LyonsN., Two Perspectives: On Self, Relationships, and Morality, Harvard Educational Review, 53, pp. 125–145, 1983.
11.
PrattM.GoldingG., and HunterW., Does Morality Have a Gender?: Sex, Sex Role, and Moral Judgment Relationships across the Adult Life Span, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30, pp. 321–340, 1984.
12.
SmetanaJ., Does Morality Have a Gender?: A Comment on Pratt, Golding, and Hunter, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 30, pp. 341–347, 1984.
13.
Nunner-WinklerG., Two Moralities, in Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development, KurtinesW. and GewirtzJ. (eds.), Wiley, New York, NY, 1984.
14.
SalthouseT., Adult Cognition, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1982.
15.
BielbyD. and PapaliaD., Moral Development and Perceptual Role-Taking: Their Development and Interrelationship across the Lifespan, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 6, pp. 293–308, 1975.
16.
DenneyN., Aging and Cognitive Changes, in Handbook of Developmental Psychology, WolmanB. (ed.), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1982.
17.
DenneyN. and ThissenD., Determinants of Cognitive Abilities in the Elderly, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 16, pp. 29–41, 1983.
18.
PrattM.GoldingG., and HunterW., Aging as Ripening: Character and Consistency of Moral Judgment in Young, Mature, and Older Adults, Human Development, 26, pp. 277–288, 1983.
19.
SchaieK. W., Toward a Stage Theory of Adult Cognitive Development, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 8, pp. 129–138, 1977.
20.
MurphyM. and GilliganC., Moral Development in Late Adolescence and Early Adulthood: A Critique and Reconstruction of Kohlberg's Theory, Human Development, 23, pp. 77–104, 1980.
21.
Labouvie-ViefG., Beyond Formal Operations: Uses and Limits of Pure Logic in Lifespan Development, Human Development, 23, pp. 141–161, 1980.
22.
WhiteR. W., Lives in Progress, 2nd Edition, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, NY, 1965.
23.
BromleyD., Some Experimental Tests of the Effects of Age on Creative Intellectual Output, Journal of Gerontology, 11, pp. 74–82, 1956.
24.
CicirelliV., Categorization Behavior in Aging Subjects, Journal of Gerontology, 31, pp. 676–690, 1976.
25.
EriksonE., Reflections on Dr. Borg's Life Cycle, in Adulthood, EriksonE. (ed.), Norton, New York, NY, 1978.
26.
FiskeS. and TaylorS., Social Cognition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1984.
27.
RestJ., Morality, in Manual of Child Psychology, 4th Edition, MussenP. (gen. ed.), Wiley, New York, NY, 1983.
28.
ColbyA. and KohlbergL., Standard Form Scoring Manual, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, in press.
29.
ShulikR., Faith Development, Moral Development, and Old Age: An Assessment of Fowler's Faith Development Paradigm, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 1979.
30.
Labouvie-ViefG., Individual Time, Social Time, and Intellectual Aging, in Aging and Life Course Transitions: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, HarevenT. and AdamsK. (eds.), Guilford Press, New York, NY, 1982.
31.
SpilichG., Life-Span Components of Text Processing, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp. 231–244, 1983.
32.
LachmanR.LachmanJ., and TaylorD., Reallocation of Mental Resources Over the Productive Lifespan, in Aging and Cognitive Processes, CraikF. and TrehubS. (eds.), Plenum, New York, NY, 1982.
33.
PrattM.GoldingG.HunterW., and SampsonR., Principles and Prototypes: Do Men and Women Think Differently about Moral Issues?, paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto, 1985.
