Evidence is presented on editorial misconduct in Science, with particular reference to prejudice and bias against environmental, consumer, and occupational concerns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelsonP. H.Cancer phobia. Science237: 473, 1987.
2.
AmesB.Ranking possible carcinogenic hazards. Science236: 271–280, 1987.
3.
EpsteinS. S.SwartzJ. B.Carcinogenic risk assessment. Science240: 1043–1045, 1988. [This article was co-signed by some 15 nationally recognized experts in carcinogenesis, epidemiology, and public health.]
4.
AbelsonP. H.Product liability in a litigious society. Science240: 1589, 1988.
5.
National Center for State Courts. 1. A Preliminary Examination of Available Civil and Criminal Trend Data in State Trial Courts for 1978, 1981, and 1984. April 1986.
6.
KakalikJ. S.PaceN. M.Cost and Compensation Paid in Tort Litigation. Rand Institute, 1986.
7.
HenslerD. R.Trends in Tort Litigation: The Story Behind the Statistics. Rand Institute, 1987.
8.
BroadW. J.Question of scientific fakery is raised in inquiry. New York Times, July 12, 1989, p. 18.
