The physician's duty to preserve patient confidentiality is challenged when doing so may endanger third parties. We present the case of a bus driver whose alcohol dependence raised concerns of a risk not only to his own health and safety, but to public safety as well. We first examine the legal and ethical obligations to report his alcohol use to his employer and then stress the importance of weighing the potential harm of violating patient-physician confidentiality against the severity of risk to the general public.
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 551 P.2d 334, California1976.
2.
EwingJA. Detecting alcoholism: The CAGE questionnaire. The Journal of the American Medical Association1984; 252: 1905–1907.
3.
ApplebaumPS. Privacy in psychiatric treatment: Threats and responses. The American Journal of Psychiatry2002; 159: 1809–1818.
4.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001: 308.
5.
Megan's Law. 42 U.S.C. 14071, H.R. 2137, 1996.
6.
AschkenasyMTDrescherMJRatzanRM. Physician reporting of medically impaired drivers. The Journal of Emergency Medicine2005; 30: 29–39.
7.
Ohio Statute š 2305.33, 1997.
8.
Public policy statement on reporting of patient information related to fitness for driving or other potentially dangerous activities. The Journal of Addictive Diseases2000; 19: 125–127.
9.
LeemanCPCohenMAParkasV. Should a psychiatrist report a bus driver's alcohol and drug abuse? An ethical dilemma. General Hospital Psychiatry2001; 23: 333–336.
