This study compared the psychosocial adjustment and drug use of eighth grade students beginning middle school in the fifth, sixth, or seventh grade. Eighth grade students beginning middle school in the fifth and sixth grade had more favorable drug use attitudes, had more drug using friends, and felt their friends were less opposed to using drugs than did students beginning middle school in the seventh grade. Eighth grade students beginning middle school in the sixth grade used drugs more frequently than students beginning in the seventh grade. The school organization variables were not statistically significant in a model which accounted for 67 percent of the variance in the drug use variable. The significance of the grade-level organization of schools is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JohnstonL. D.BachmanJ. G.O'MalleyP. M., Drug Use among American High School Students: 1975–19 77, National Institute of Drug Abuse, Washington, D.C., 1977.
2.
JohnstonL. D., Drug Use in America 1975–1980, National Institute of Drug Abuse, Washington, D.C., 1981.
3.
LounsburyJ., The Middle School: A National Perspective, Colorado Journal of Educational Research, 20, pp. 3–6, 1981.
4.
AlexanderW.GeorgeP., The Exemplary Middle School, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1981.
5.
DemboR.FarrowD.Des JarlaisD.BurgosW.SchmeidlerJ., Examining a Causal Model of Early Drug Involvement among Inner City Junior High School Youths, Human Relations, 34:3, pp. 169–193, 1981.
6.
JessorR.CollinsM.JessorS. L., On Becoming a Drinker: Social-Psychological Aspects of an Adolescent Transition, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 197, pp. 199–213, 1972.
7.
WillsonJ., Drug Abuse among High School Students, Journal of Drug Education, 9, pp. 11–20, 1979.
8.
BrauchtG.BrakarshD.FollingstadD.BerryK., Deviant Drug Use in Adolescence: A Review of Psychosocial Correlates, Psychological Bulletin, 79, pp. 92–106, 1973.
9.
KandelD. B., Adolescent Marijuana Use: Role of Parents and Peers, Science, 181, pp. 1067–1070, 1973.
10.
KandelD. B., Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues, Hemisphere-Wiley, Washington, D.C., 1978.
11.
JessorR.JessorS. L.FinneyJ., A Social Psychology of Marijuana Use: Longitudinal Studies of High School and College Growth, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, pp. 1–15, 1973.
12.
JessorR.JessorS. L., Adolescent Development and the Onset of Drinking: A Longitudinal Study, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36, pp. 27–51, 1975.
13.
KiltyK., Attitudinal and Normative Variables as Predictors of Drinking Behavior, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 39, pp. 1178–1194, 1978.
14.
BiddleB., B. Bank, and M. Marlin, Social Determinates of Adolescent Drinking: What They Think, What They Do, What I Think and Do, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 41, pp. 215–241, 1980.
15.
FejerD.SmartR., The Knowledge about Drugs, Attitudes Towards Them, and Drug Use Rates of High School Students, Journal of Drug Education, 3: 4, pp. 377–388, 1973.
16.
BowermanC.KinchJ. E., Changes in Family and Peer Orientations of Children between the Fourth and Tenth Grades, Social Forces, 37, pp. 206–211, 1959.
17.
SimmonsR. G.RosenbergF.RosenbergM., Disturbance in the Self-image at Adolescence, American Sociological Review, 38, pp. 553–568, 1973.
18.
BlythD.HillJ.SmythC., The Influence of Older Adolescents on Younger Adolescents: Do Grade-level Arrangements Make a Difference in Behaviors, Attitudes and Experiences, unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1980.
19.
KandelD. B.KesslerR. C.MargaliesR. Z., Antecedents of Initiation Into Stages of Drug Use: A Developmental Analysis, in Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues, KandelD. B. (ed.), Hemisphere-Wiley, Washington, D.C., 1978.
20.
DemboR.BurgosW.BabstD. V.SchmeidlerJ.LaGrandL. E., Neighborhood Relationships and Drug Involvement among Inter-City Junior High School Youths: Implications for Drug Education and Prevention Programming, Journal of Drug Education, 8: 3, pp. 231–251, 1978.
21.
DullR. T., An Empirical Examination of the Anomie Theory of Drug Use, Journal of Drug Education, 13: 1, pp. 49–62, 1983.
22.
ForsS. W.RojeckD. G., The Social and Demographic Correlates of Adolescent Drug Use Patterns, Journal of Drug Education, 13: 3, pp. 205–222, 1983.
23.
AlwinD., Assessing School Effects: Some Identities, Sociology of Education, 49, pp. 294–303, 1976.
24.
StipakB.HenslerC., Statistical Inference in Contextual Analysis, American Journal of Political Science,26, pp. 151–175, 1982.
25.
BohrnstedtG.CarterT., Robustness in Regression Analysis, in Sociological Methodology: 1971, CostnerH. (ed.), Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco, California, 1971.
26.
LabovitzS., Some Observations on Measurement and Statistics, Social Forces, 46, pp. 151–160, 1967.
27.
LabovitzS., The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories, American Sociological Review, 35, pp. 515–524, 1970.
28.
LyonsM., Techniques for Using Ordinal Measures in Regression and Path Analysis, in Sociological Methodology: 1971, CostnerH. (ed.), Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco, California, 1971.
29.
AkersR. L., Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach, 2nd edition, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, 1977.
30.
RoomR., Concepts and Strategies in the Prevention of Alcohol-related Problems, Contemporary Drug Problems, 9, pp. 9–48, 1980.
31.
RoomR., The Case for a Problem Prevention Approach to Alcohol, Drug and Mental Problems, Public Health Reports, 96, pp. 26–33, 1981.
