Funerals of the Unaffiliated

Abstract

Over one-third of Americans do not claim membership in a religious congregation, but the vast majority of the “congregationally unaffiliated” continue to mark major life events, such as death, through communal rituals officiated by religious professionals. If bereaved families do not have a clergyperson or a religious tradition to guide them in planning a funeral, to whom and to what do they turn? This article presents findings from an ethnographic study that explored four dimensions of unaffiliated funerals: creativity versus standardization, the process of ritual creation, lay participation, and shared meaning. The findings suggest that despite their informal character and emphasis on spontaneous sharing, unaffiliated funerals utilize a highly standardized ritual structure. Furthermore, though unaffiliated services focus on the life of the deceased rather than a theological interpretation of death, they articulate shared meaning by emphasizing belief in God, personal immortality, and the importance of ethical living.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ammerman

(1997). Golden rule Christianity: Lived religion in the American mainstream. In Hall

(Ed.), Lived religion in America: Toward a history of practice (pp. 196–216). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Reprinted by permission of Princeton University Press.

Bellah

R. N.

(1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Berger

(1985). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Anchor Books.

Chidester

(1990). Patterns of transcendence: Religion, death and dying. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.

Davies

(1997). Death, ritual, and belief: The rhetoric of funerary rites. London: Cassell.

Heinz

(1999). The last passage: Recovering a death of our own. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jackson

(1989). Paths toward a clearing: Radical empiricism and ethnographic inquiry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Laderman

(1996). The sacred remains: American attitudes toward death, 1799–1883. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Mellor

P. A.

, & Shilling

(1993). Modernity, self-identity and the sequestration of death. Sociology, 27, 411–431.

10.

Moller

D. W.

(1996). Confronting death: Values, institutions, and human mortality. New York: Oxford University Press.

11.

Prothero

(2001). Purified by fire: A history of cremation in America. Berkeley: University of California.

12.

Richards

T. A.

Wrubel

, & Folkman

(2000). Death rites in the San Francisco gay community: Cultural developments of the AIDS epidemic. Omega, 40, 335–350.

13.

Roof

(1999). Spiritual marketplace: Baby boomers and the remaking of American religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

14.

Walter

(1994). The revival of death. London: Routledge.

15.

Walter

(1999). On bereavement: The culture of grief. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

16.

Wirthlin Worldwide (2000). Executive summary of the funeral and memorial information counsel study of American attitudes toward ritualization and memorialization: 1999 update. Retrieved December 19, 2001. (http://www.cremationassociation.org/docs/attitude.pdf).

17.

Wuthnow

(1998). After heaven: Spirituality in America since the 1950s. Berkeley: University of California Press.

18.

Direct reprint requests to:.