The recent trend of incorporating more visuals into communication challenges technical communicators, who must now possess both verbal and visual literacy. Despite all the recent scholarship on visual aspects of technical communication, technical communicators lack thorough guidelines for selecting and composing effective images that convey thematic and conceptual information, or what Schriver calls “stage-setting” images. This article reviews existing literature in visual communication and reports results of a study that assessed readers' opinions of themes conveyed by specific example images. It then suggests that the rhetorical tropes of metonymy and synecdoche can be used to identify images for conveying certain themes, and that successful stage-setting images will show intrinsic, not extrinsic, relationships to their thematic subject matter.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HellerS., The End of Illustration, in The Education of an Illustrator, HellerS. and ArismanM. (eds.), Allworth Press, New York, pp. 23–28, 2000.
2.
BrasseurL. E., Visualizing Technical Information: A Cultural Critique, Technical Communication Series, Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, New York, 2003.
3.
SchriverK. A., Dynamics in Document Design: Creating Texts for Readers, Wiley, New York, 1997.
4.
BernhardtS. A., Seeing the Text, College Composition and Communication, 37: 1, pp. 66–88, 1986.
5.
DraggaS. and GongG., Editing: The Design of Rhetoric, Technical Communication Series, Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, New York, 1989.
6.
KostelnickC. and RobertsD. D., Designing Visual Language: Strategies for Professional Communicators, Series in Technical Communication, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, 1998.
7.
LayM. M., Nonrhetorical Elements of Layout and Design, in Technical Writing: Theory and Practice, FearingB. E. and SparrowW. K. (eds.), Modern Language Association, New York, pp. 72–89, 1989.
8.
WheildonC., Type & Layout: How Typography and Design Can Get Your Message Across—or Get in the Way, Strathmoor Press, Berkeley, California, 1996.
9.
KostelnickC., Supra-Textual Design: The Visual Rhetoric of Whole Documents, Technical Communication Quarterly, 5: 1, pp. 9–33, 1996.
10.
ParkerR. C. and BerryP., Looking Good in Print (4th Ed.), Coriolis Press, Scottsdale, Arizona, 1998.
11.
GoldsmithE., Research into Illustration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984.
12.
DraggaS., Evaluating Pictorial Illustrations, Technical Communication Quarterly, 1: 2, pp. 47–62, 1992.
13.
FossS. K., A Rhetorical Schema for the Evaluation of Visual Imagery, Communication Studies, 45, pp. 213–224, Fall-Winter 1994.
14.
ArnheimR., Visual Thinking, University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 1969.
15.
McCloudS., Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art, HarperPerennial, New York, 1993.
16.
DoumontJ. L., Visual Versus Verbal: A Word is Worth a Thousand Pictures, Too. Technical Communication, 49: 2, pp. 219–224, 2002.
17.
WileyJ., Cognitive and Educational Implications of Visually Rich Media: Images and Imagination, in Eloquent Images: Word and Image in the Age of New Media, HocksM. E. and KendrickM. (eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 202–215, 2003.
18.
LakoffG. and JohnsonM., Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1980.
19.
DondisD. A., A Primer of Visual Literacy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1973.
20.
HornR. E., Visual Language: Global Communication for the 21st Century, MacroVU, Bainbridge Island, Washington, 1998.
21.
HansenY. M., Visualization for Thinking, Planning, and Problem Solving, in Information Design, JacobsenRobert (ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 193–220, 1999.
22.
KressG. and van LeeuwenT., Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, Routledge, London, 1996.
HilligossS. and HowardT., Visual Communication: A Writer's Guide (2nd Ed.), Longman, New York, 2002.
25.
HarrisonC., Visual Social Semiotics: Understanding How Still Images Make Meaning, Technical Communication, 50: 1, pp. 46–60, 2003.
26.
ReevesA., e-mail to the author, November 30, 2001.
27.
Jacobsen-HorniJ., e-mail to the author, November 15, 2001.
28.
PaivioA., Imagery and Verbal Processes, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1971.
29.
CorbettE. P. J. and ConnorsR., Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student (4th Ed.), Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.
30.
LanhamR., A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms (2nd Ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 1991.
31.
ChandlerD., Challenging the Literal, in Semiotics: The Basics. Routledge, London, pp. 123–146, 2002.
32.
GoveiaC. and Hatmaker, Visual Thesaurus: A Quick-Flip Brainstorming Tool for Graphic Designers, Rockport, Gloucester, Massachusetts, 2003.
33.
LesterP. M., Visual Communication: Images with Messages (2nd Ed.), Wordsworth, Belmont, California, 2000.
34.
BonsiepeG., Visual/Verbal Rhetoric, Ulm: Journal of the Ulm School of Design, 14/15/16, pp. 23–40, 1965.
35.
United States Dept. of the Navy, How to Be Green and Stay in the Black: Environmental Guideline Document, Naval Inventory Control Point, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1997.
36.
United States Dept. of Education, Report in Brief: NAEP 1996 Trends in Academic Progress (Revised), Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1998.
37.
United States Dept. of Labor, Employment Outlook, 1998–2008: Occupational Change from an Industry Perspective, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 2000.
38.
United States Dept. of Labor, Transportation and Forestry, Fishing, and Related Occupations, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1992.
39.
TufteE. R., Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative, Graphics Press, Cheshire, Connecticut, 1997.
40.
ReevesM., e-mail to the author, December 3, 2001.
41.
AndrewsD. C., Review of Designing Visual Language: Strategies for Professional Communicators, by C. Kostelnick and D. D. Roberts, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13: 2, pp. 229–231, 1999.
42.
HortonW., The Almost Universal Language: Graphics for International Documents, Technical Communication, 40: 4, pp. 682–693, 1993.
43.
CoeM., Human Factors for Technical Communicators, Wiley Technical Communication Library, New York, 1996.
44.
NewberryB., Designer's Guide to Marketing, North Light, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1997.
45.
DraggaS. and VossD., Cruel Pies: The Inhumanity of Technical Illustrations, Technical Communication, 48: 3, pp. 265–274, 2001.
46.
SalinasC., Technical Rhetoricians and the Art of Configuring Images, Technical Communication Quarterly, 11: 2, pp. 165–183, 2002.
47.
Willerton, How to Use Images to Convey Themes, Proceedings of the Society for Technical Communication's 50th Annual Conference, May 18–21, 2003, Dallas, TX, 2003.
