Due to the severity of the risks involved in violation of ethical principles with research of American Indian populations, more attention in literature is needed on the topic. This article reviews discussions of ethical and methodological issues, uses Muscogee Creeks' responses from the author's prior study (Walker, 2008; Walker & Balk, 2007) as an example and application, and specifically focuses on the research of death and bereavement. The article provides ethical reflection and recommendations for designing death and bereavement research as an outsider to the culture, as well as for building trust with participants in American Indian populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenJ. (2007). A multicultural assessment supervision model to guide research and practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(3), 248–258.
2.
BeauvaisF. (1999). Obtaining consent and other ethical issues in the conduct of research in American Indian Communities. Drugs & Society, 14, 167–184.
3.
BlevinsD., & PapadatouD. (2006). The effects of culture in end-of-life situations. In WerthJ. L., & BlevinsD. (Eds.), Psychosocial issues near the end of life: A resource for professional care providers (pp. 27–55). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
4.
BowlbyJ. (1980). Attachment and loss, vol. III: Loss, sadness, and depression. London: Hogarth Press.
5.
CarterB.S., & SandlingJ. (1992). Decision making in the NICU: The question of medical futility. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 3(2), 142–145.
6.
ChaudhuriJ. (2001). Some notes on political theory and American Indian values: The case of the Muscogee Creeks. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 25(2), 129–135.
7.
ChaudhuriJ. & ChaudhuriJ. (2001). A sacred path: The way of the Muscogee Creeks. Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles American Indian Studies Center.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
DarouW. G.HumA., & KurtnessJ. (1993). An investigation of the impact of psycho-social research on a Native population. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24(3), 325–329.
10.
FouadN. A., & ArredondoP. (2007). Becoming culturally oriented: Practical advice for psychologists and educators. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
11.
FreudS. (1917/1957). Mourning and melancholia. In StracheyJ. (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 237–260). London: Hogarth Press.
12.
MailP. D.ConnerJ., & ConnerC. N. (2006). New collaborations with Native Americans in the conduct of community research. Health Education & Behavior, 33(2), 148–153.
13.
McCabeM. (1994). Patient Self-Determination Act: A Native American (Navajo) perspective. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 3, 419–421.
14.
McCormickR. M. (1998). Ethical considerations in First Nations counseling and research. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 32(4), 284–297.
15.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1976). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects in research (DHEW Publication No. OS 78–0013). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16.
NeimeyerR. A.PrigersonH. G., & DaviesB. (2002). Mourning and meaning. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 235–251.
17.
PedersonP. (1997). The cultural context of the American Counseling Code of Ethics. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 23–35.
18.
PrestonR. J., & PrestonS. C. (1991). Death and grieving among northern forest hunters: An East Creek example. In CountsD. R. & CountsD. A. (Eds.), Coping with the final tragedy: Cultural variation in dying and grieving (pp. 135–155). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
19.
QuigleyD. (2006). A review of improved ethical practices in environmental and public health research: Case examples from native communities. Health Education & Behavior, 33(2), 130–147.
20.
StiffmanA. R.BrownE.StrileyC. W.OstmannE., & ChowaG. (2005). Cultural and ethical issues concerning research on American Indian youth. Ethics & Behavior, 15, 1–14.
21.
StroebeM. S., & SchutH. (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies, 23, 197–224.
22.
StroebeM. S.SchutH., & StroebeW. (2005). Attachment in coping with bereavement: A theoretical integration. Review of General Psychology, 9, 48–66.
23.
Van WinkleN. W. (2000). End-of-life decision making in American Indian and Alaska native cultures. In BraunK. L.PietschJ. H., & BlanchetteP. L. (Eds.), Cultural issues in end-of-life decision making (pp. 127–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
WalkerA. C. (2002). [A social construction of grieving and bereavement rituals in the Muscogee Creek tribe]. Unpublished raw data.
25.
WalkerA. C. (2008). Grieving in the Muscogee Creek tribe. Death Studies, 32, 123–141.
26.
WalkerA.C. & BalkD.E. (2007). Bereavement rituals in the Muscogee Creek tribe. Death Studies, 31, 633–652.
