Obituaries from the New York Times are examined at three points to illuminate changing conceptions of death. The findings are twofold. Changes in the obituary demonstrate how the locus of social control over death has shifted from nature and God, to medicine and most recently to the individual. Additionally, it is shown that descriptions of biophysical aspects of the dying process are marginalized over time and that there is more frequent use of language that emphasizes death-resistant themes in the most recent obituaries. This finding exemplifies the observation of increasing claims to authority over mortality by individuals in recent decades.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlaliA. O. (1994). The disposition of AIDS imagery in New York Times obituaries. Omega, 29(4), 273–289.
2.
ArièsP. (1974). Western attitudes towards death: From the middle ages to the present. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
ArièsP. (1981). The hour of our death. London: Allen Lane.
4.
ArièsP. (1985). Images of man and death. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
CameronP.PlayfairW. L., & WellumS. (1994). The longevity of homosexuals: Before and after the AIDS epidemic. Omega, 29(3), 249–272.
6.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics and National Vital Statistics System. (2001). National Vital Statistics Report, 48(18). Hyattsville, MD and: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
7.
DokaK. (2005). Ethics, end-of-life decisions and grief. Mortality, 10(1), 83–90.
8.
DurkheimE. (1912 [1995]). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: The Free Press.
9.
EliasN. (1985). The loneliness of dying. Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
FowlerB. (2005). Collective memory and forgetting: Components for a study of obituaries. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(6), 53–72.
11.
FoxR. C. (1980). The social meaning of death. Philadelphia: The American Academy of Political and Social Science.
12.
FoxR. C. (1981, March). The sting of death in American society. Social Service Review, pp. 42–59.
13.
FrankD. J., & MeyerJ. W. (2002). The profusion of individual roles and identities in the postwar period. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 86–105.
14.
FreidsonE. (1970). Professional dominance: The social structure of medical care. New York: Atherton Press.
15.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
GoodM. J. (1995). American medicine: The quest for competence. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
17.
GoodM. J.GoodB. J.SchafferC., & LindS. E. (1990). American oncology and the discourse on hope. Culture, Medicine and Society, 14, 59–79.
18.
HalburB., & VandagriffM. (1987). Societal responses after death: A study of sex-differences in newspaper death notices for Birmingham, Alabama, 1900–1985. Sex Roles, 17(7–8), 421–436.
19.
HaleyW. (1977). Rest in prose: The art of the obituary. American Scholar, 46(2), 206–211.
20.
HumeJ. (2000). Obituaries in American culture. Jackson, MS: University of Mississippi.
21.
HumeJ. (2003). “Portraits of grief,” reflectors of values: The New York Times remembers victims of September 11. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(1), 166–182.
22.
KastenbaumR.PeytonS., & KastenbaumB. (1977). Sex discrimination after death. Omega, 7, 351–359.
23.
KearlM. (1986). Death as a measure of life: A research note on the Kastenbaum-Spilka strategy of obituary analysis. Omega, 17(1), 65–78.
24.
LongG. L. (1987). Organizations and identity: Obituaries 1856–1972. Social Forces, 65(4): 964–1001.
25.
MarksA., & PiggeeT. (1998). Obituary analysis and describing a life lived: The impact of race, gender, age and economic status. Omega, 38(1), 37–57.
26.
MayburyK.K. (1995). Invisible lives: Women, men and obituaries. Omega, 32(1), 27–37.
27.
MooreS. H. (2002). Disinterring ideology from a corpus of obituaries: A critical post mortem. Discourse & Society, 13(4), 496–536.
28.
MoremenR. D., & CradduckC. (1998). “How will you be remembered after you die?” Gender discrimination after death twenty years later. Omega, 38(4), 241–254.
29.
NakaoK., & TreasJ. (1994). Updating occupational prestige and socioeconomic scores: How the new measures measure up. Sociological Methodology, 24, 1–72.
30.
NakashimaM., & CandaE. R. (2005). Positive dying and resiliency in later life: A qualitative study. Journal of Aging Studies, 19(1), 109–125.
31.
NordD. P. (1990). Teleology and news: The religious roots of American journalism, 1630–1730. The Journal of American History, 77(1), 9–38.
32.
ParsonsT. (1951). The social system. New York: The Free Press.
33.
ParsonsT. (1963). Death in American society: A brief working paper. American Behavioral Scientist (Special Issue), 6, 61–65.
34.
ParsonsT., & LidzV. (1967). Death in American society. In ShneidmanE. S. (Ed.), Essays in self-destruction. New York: Science House.
35.
PetersonR. A. (1994). Culture studies through the production perspective. In CraneD. (Ed.), The sociology of culture: Emerging theoretical perspectives. New York: Blackwell.
36.
PhillipsD. P. (1974). The influence of suggestion on suicide: Substantive and theoretical implications of the Werther effect. American Sociological Review, 39, 340–354.
37.
SealeC. (1998). Constructing death: The sociology of dying and bereavement. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
SealeC. (2000). Changing patterns of death and dying. Social Science and Medicine, 51(6), 917–930.
39.
SpilkaB.LaceyG., & GelbB. (1980). Sex discrimination after death: Replication, extension and a difference. Omega, 10(3), 227–233.
40.
StarckN. (2005). Posthumous parallel and parallax: The obituary revival on three continents. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 267–283.
41.
StarrP. (1982). The social transformation of American medicine. New York: Basic Books.
42.
VernonG. M. (1970). Sociology of death: An analysis of death-related behavior. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
43.
WalterT. A. (1994). The revival of death. London: Routledge.
44.
WalterT. A. (1996). Facing death without tradition. In HowarthH. & JuppP. C. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in the sociology of death, dying and disposal. London: Macmillan Press.
45.
WilliamsJ. E. (1997). Discourses on death: Obituaries and the management of spoiled identity. Omega, 34(4), 301–319.
