Both assessment practitioners and administrators often view retention as a stay versus go outcome, but first-year outcomes are much more complex, as some students decide to stay, others to transfer, some simply take some time off, and others decide to discontinue their education altogether. This article discusses empirical problems in confining retention studies to stay-versus-go outcomes, and reviews data resources such as exit surveys, transcript requests, withdrawn student surveys, state transfer student databases, and the National Student Clearinghouse's Enrollment Search program that can all be used to gain a richer understanding of first-year outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenD. (1999). Desire to finish college: An empirical link between motivation and persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40(4), 461–486.
2.
AllenD., & NoraA. (1995). An empirical examination of the construct validity of goal commitment in the persistence process. Research in Higher Education, 36(5), 509–533.
3.
BakerS., & PomerantzN. (2000). Impact of learning communities on retention at a metropolitan university. Journal of College Student Retention, 2(2), 115–126.
4.
BeanJ. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12, 155–187.
5.
BeanJ. P. (1983). The application of a model of turnover in work organizations to the student attrition process. Review of Higher Education, 60, 155–182.
6.
BergerJ. B., & BraxtonJ. M. (1998). Revising Tinto's interactionalist theory of student departure through theory elaboration: Examining the role of organizational attributes in the persistence process. Research in Higher Education, 39(2), 103–119.
7.
BraxtonJ. M.VesperN., & HosslerD. (1995). Expectations for college and student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 36(5), 595–612.
8.
CabreraA. F.NoraA., & CastanedaM. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. Journal of Higher Education, 64(2), 123–139.
9.
DesJardinsS. L.AhlburgD. S., & McCallB. P. (1999). An event history model of student departure. Economics of Education Review, 18, 375–390.
10.
DesJardinsS. L., & PontiffH. (1999). Tracking institutional leavers: An application. Association of Institutional Research Professional File, 71, 1–14.
11.
DillmanD. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys. New York: Wiley.
12.
FenskeR. H.PorterJ. D., & DuBrockC. P. (2000). Tracking financial aid and persistence of women, minority, and needy students in science, engineering and mathematics. Research in Higher Education, 41(1), 67–94.
13.
FullerW. C.ManskiC. F., & WiseD. A. (1982). New evidence on the economic determinants of postsecondary schooling choices. Journal of Human Resources, 17(4), 477–498.
14.
GregermanS. R. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55–72.
15.
HydeM. S., & Gess-NewsomeJ. (2000). Adjusting educational practice to increase female persistence in the sciences. Journal of College Student Retention, 1(4), 335–356.
16.
KraemerB. A. (1995). Factors affecting Hispanic student transfer behavior. Research in Higher Education, 36(3), 303–322.
17.
MalletteB. I., & CabreraA. F. (1991). Determinants of withdrawal behavior: An exploratory study. Research in Higher Education, 32(2), 179–194.
18.
ManskiC. F., & WiseD. A. (1983). College choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
NoraA. (1990). Campus-based aid programs as determinants of retention among Hispanic community college students. Journal of Higher Education, 61(3), 312–331.
20.
NoraA.CabreraA.HagedornL. S., & PascarellaE. (1996). Differential impacts of academic and social experiences on college-related behavioral outcomes across different ethnic and gender groups at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 427–451.
21.
OkunM. A.BeninM., & Brandt-WilliamsA. (1996). Staying in college: Moderators of the relation between intention and institutional departure. Journal of Higher Education, 67(5), 577–596.
22.
OrdovenskyJ. F. (1995). Effects of institutional attributes on enrollment choice: Implications for postsecondary education. Economics of Education Review, 14(4), 335–350.
23.
PascarellaE. T., & TerenziniP. T. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 51(1), 60–75.
24.
PorterS. R. (2001). Retention research with national databases. In SwingR. L. (Ed.), Proving and Improving: Strategies for assessing the first college year (The First-Year Experience Monograph Series No. 33). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.
25.
PorterS. R. (2002). Including transfer-out behavior in retention models: Using the NSC Enrollment Search data. Association of Institutional Research Professional File, 82, 1–15.
26.
RoncoS. L. (1996). How enrollment ends: Analyzing the correlates of student graduation, transfer and dropout with a competing risks model. Association of Institutional Research Professional File, 61, 1–16.
27.
St. JohnE. P. (1994). The influence of student aid on within-year persistence by traditional college-age students in four-year colleges. Research in Higher Education, 35(4), 455–480.
28.
St. JohnE. P. (1996). The nexus between college choice and persistence. Research in Higher Education, 37(2), 175–220.
29.
St. JohnE. P. (2000). The impact of student aid on recruitment and retention: What the research indicates. New Directions for Student Services, 89, 61–76.
30.
St. JohnE. P.KirshsteinR. J., & NoellJ. (1990). The impact of student financial aid on persistence: A sequential analysis. Review of Higher Education, 14, 383–486.
31.
SzafranR.F. (2001). The effect of academic load on success for new college students: Is lighter better?Research in Higher Education, 42(1), 27–50.
32.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
WeilerW. C. (1987). An application of the nested multinomial logit model to enrollment choice behavior. Research in Higher Education, 27(3), 273–282.
34.
WeilerW. C. (1996). Factors influencing the matriculation choices of high ability students. Economics of Education Review, 15(1), 23–36.
35.
WillettJ. B., & SingerJ. D. (1991). From whether to when: New methods for studying student dropout and teach attrition. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 407–450.
