Document designers who present procedural instructions can choose several formats: prose, table, logical tree, or flow chart. In all cases, however, it is essential that the instructions are ordered in a way that allows users to reach the outcome in as little time as possible. In this article two formal methods are discussed that help determine which order is most efficient. The first method is based on the selection principle. The second method is based on the principle of the average least effort.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CornelisL., The Passive Voice in Computer Manuals: A New Perspective, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25, pp. 285–301, 1995.
2.
MulderM., Perception of Anthropomorphistic Expressions in Software Manuals, (this issue), pp. 489–506, 1996.
3.
JansenC. J. M. and SteehouderM. F., Taalverkeersproblemen tussen overheid en burger. Een onderzoek naar verbeteringsmogelijkheden van voorlichtingsteksten en formulieren, (Communication Problems between Government and Citizens, A Study into Techniques for Improving the Quality of Instructional Texts and Forms (with a summary in English), SDU Uitgeverij, The Hague, 1989.
4.
SteehouderM. and JansenC., Optimizing the Quality of Forms, in Studies of Functional Text Quality, Pander MaatH. and SteehouderM. (eds.), Editions Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 159–172, 1992.
5.
WrightP. and ReidF., Written Information: Some Alternatives to Prose for Expressing the Outcomes of Complex Contingencies, Journal of Applied Linguistics, 57, pp. 160–166, 1973.
6.
LewisB. N.HorabinI. S., and GaneC. P., Case Studies in the Use of Algorithms, Pergamon Press, London, 1967.
7.
BerryE., How to Get Users to Follow Procedures?IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 25, pp. 22–25, 1982.
8.
HorabinI. and LewisB., Algorithms, The Instructional Design Library, Vol. 2, Englewoods Cliffs, New Jersey, 1978.
9.
KamrnanR., The Comprehensibility of Printed Instructions and the Flow Chart Alternative, Human Factors, 17, pp. 183–191, 1975.
10.
HollandV. M. and RoseA., A Comparison of Prose and Algorithms for Presenting Complex Instructions, American Institutes for Research, Washington, 1981.
11.
KrohnG. S.: Flow Charts Used for Procedural Instructions, Human Factors, 25, pp. 573–581, 1983.
12.
Lagendijk-SwartbolM. and DriessensJ., Presentatievormen voor handleidingen. Een toepassing voor de Telemix 512, (Design of User Instructions: An Application for the Telemix 512), master's thesis, Utrecht University, 1987.
13.
JansenC. and SteehouderM., Improving the Text of a Public Leaflet, Information Design Journal, 4, pp. 10–18, 1984.
14.
BarnardP.WrightP., and WilcoxP., Effects of Response Instruction and Question Style on the Ease of Completing Forms, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, pp. 209–226, 1979.
15.
WheatleyD. M. and UnwinA. W., The Algorithm Writer's Guide, Longman, London, 1972.
16.
LandaL. N., Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction, Educational Technology Publishers, Englewood Cliffs, 1974.
17.
JansenC. and SteehouderM., Improving the Text of a Public Leaflet, Information Design Journal, 4, pp. 10–18, 1984.
18.
JansenC. J. M.SteehouderM. F.PilotA.SchrauwenD., and LooijmansP. J. M., ALEXIS: Computer-Assisted Feedback on Written Assignments, Computer and Composition, 4, pp. 32–45, 1986.
19.
SteehouderM. and JansenC., From Bureaucratic Language to Instructional Texts: How to Design an Effective Problem-Solving Tool for Citizens, Information Design Journal, 5, pp. 129–139, 1987.
20.
JansenC. and SteehouderM., Forms as a Source of Communication Problems, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 22, pp. 179–194, 1992.
21.
SteehouderM., The Quality of Access: Helping Users Find Information in Documentation, in Quality of Technical Documentation, SteehouderM.JansenC.van der PoortP., and VerheijenR. (eds.), Editions Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta, Georgia. Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication, Vol. 3, pp. 131–144, 1994.
22.
JansenC., Computerised Writing Aids: Do They Really Help?, in Quality of Technical Documentation, SteehouderM.JansenC.van der PoortP., and VerheijenR. (eds.), Editions Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta, Georgia, Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication, Vol. 3, pp. 239–248, 1994.
23.
SteehouderM. and JansenC., Issues in Developing an Online Advisory System for Text Writers, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 24, pp. 137–146, 1994.
24.
JansenC., Research in Technical Communication in the Netherlands, Technical Communication, 41, pp. 234–239, 1994.
25.
SteehouderM. and JansenC., Optimizing the Quality of Forms, in Studies of Functional Text Quality, Pander MaatH. and SteehouderM. (eds.), Editions Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 159–172, 1992.
