GilbreathJ. (1992). “Financing environmental and infrastructure needs on the Texas-Mexico border: Will the Mexican-U.S. integrated plan help?”Journal of Environment & Development. Vol. 1: 1, pp. 152–175. p. 151.
2.
RestrepoI. (1993). “Estragos de las aguas contaminadas.”La Jornada. Oct. 11, p. 6.
3.
BarryT. and SimsB.. (1994). The challenge of cross-border environmentalist: The U.S.- Mexico case. Albuquerque NM, Bisbee AZ: Resource Center Press and Border Ecology Project, p. 9.
4.
The Texas Water Commission warned the EPA that, unless salinity levels dropped along the Rio Grande, not only will crops face ruin but saline water may also threaten the maquila industry which depends on good-quality water. (Barry & Sims, op. cit. p. 12).
5.
Barry & Sims, op.cit. p. 9.
6.
Barry and Sims, op.cit. p. 16.
7.
“The natural limits to growth.” (1991) The Economist, April 20, p. 24.
8.
Barry & Sims, op. cit. p. 16.
9.
SanchezR. (1993). “NAFTA and the environment.”Technology Review, 96: 3 (Apr).
10.
Anonymous. (1994). “Tijuana slimes San Diego.”Engineering News-Record. May 16. Vol. 232, No. 20; Pg. 15.
11.
BrattL. Erik. (1994). “Beach closures destroy IB's drawing card,”The San Diego Union-Tribune, May 6, p. B-1.
12.
LewisS.KaltofenM. and OrmsbyG.. (1991). Border trouble: Rivers in peril. (A report on water pollution due to industrial development in Northern Mexico). Boston: National Toxic Campaign Fund. p. 21.
13.
Mexican Ministry of Industry, reported in Twin Plant News. Vol 9:7 Feb. 1994. p. 41.
14.
Lewis, op. cit. 1991, p. 21.
15.
Ibid. p. viii.
16.
BrattL. Erik, op.cit.; (1994). “Sewage Pipe Bursts in Mexico, Fouling Beaches in San Diego,”The New York Times, May 4, p. A-16.
17.
BrattL. Erik. op.cit.
18.
The New York Times, op.cit.
19.
Lewis, op.cit, p. 2.
20.
SEDESOL, (1992). Protecting the Environment. Mexico's public works program for the border region. Mexico: Secretariat of Social Development.
21.
For a detailed analysis of the financial cost of the plan, see Gilbreath (1992), op. cit.
22.
Gilbreath, (1992), op. cit., p. 153.
23.
DurazoL.KampD., and LandG.. (1993). Environmental and health issues in the interior of Mexico: Options for transnational safeguards. Tijuana, Son. and Bisbee, AZ Proyecto Fronterizo de Educacion Ambiental, Border Ecology Project. p. 24.
24.
Some organizations involved in dealing with the border problems are: Arizona Toxics Project, Bisbee, Arizona; Bioconservacion, A.C., Mexico, D.F.; Border Ecology Project, Bisbee, Arizona; Center for International Environmental Law, Washington, D.C.; Centra de Ecologia y Desarrollo, Mexico, D.F.; Centra Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental, Mexico, D.F.; Comite Civico de Divulgation Ecologies, A.C. Mexicali, Baja California Norte, Mexico; Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, D.C.; Environmental Health Coalition, San Diego, CA; Equipo Pueblo, Mexico, D.F.; Proyecto Fronterizo de Educacion Ambiental, A.C. Tijuana, B.C.N. Mexico; Red Ambiental de Veracruz, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico; Red Fronteriza de Salud y Ambiente, A.C. Hermosillo Sonora, Mexico; Red Mexicana Frente al Libre Comercio, Mexico D.F.; Texas center for Policy Studies, Austin, Texas; Union de Grupos Ambiemtalistas, Mexico.
25.
MurrayL. (1991). “The politics of pollution prevention.”New Solutions. Vol. 2: 3 (Fall), pp. 3–6.
26.
SEDESOL, op.cit.
27.
Lewis, op.cit, p. iii.
28.
GeiserK. (1990). “Toxics use reduction and pollution prevention.”New Solutions. Vol. 1: 1 (Spring), pp. 43–50.
29.
BaumolW. and OatesW.E.. (1979). Economics, environmental policy and the quality of life. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.