See, for example, SarokinDavid, Cutting Chemical Wastes, INFORM, New York, 1985.
2.
Waste reduction is referred to as a “new paradigm” calling for a completely different focus for EPA. See, for example, Hirschorn, J. Technology Review, (April 1988) pp. 52–61; Office of Technology Assessment, Serious Reduction of Hazardous Waste: For Pollution Prevention and Industrial Efficiency, September, 1986; Office of Technology Assessment From Pollution Prevention: A Progress Report on Waste Reduction, June 1987.
3.
MontaguePeter, “What We Must Do — A Grass-roots Offensive Against Toxics in the '90s,”The Workbook, Vol. 14, No. 3, July/September 1989. Southwest Research and Information Center, Publisher.
4.
See, for example: (1)KruppFred. Speech given at US Environmental Protection Agency Conference on Environmental Monitoring, October 1989. (2) PilgrimH.G. and CorteseA.D.“Restructuring Environmental Risk Reduction Policy: Pollution Prevention.” Paper presented at APHA Convention, Boston, MA. November 1988.
5.
For example, US PIRG and National Toxics Campaign, “Toxic Use Reduction — From Pollution Control to Pollution Prevention.” Policy Paper. February 1989; It must be emphasized that grass-roots groups at both the national and local levels are still working out an approach to the issue in local site-specific campaigns.
6.
CommonerB.“The Environment,” in Crossroads: Environmental Priorities for the Future, p. 121, BorelliP. Ed., Island Press, 1988.
7.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Coming Clean: Superfund's Problems Can Be Solved…, OTA-ITE-433 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, October 1989).
8.
GeiserKen. From Hazardous Waste Reduction to National Materials Policy, Proceedings of the International Conference on Waste Minimization and National Materials Policy. Geneva, June, 1989.
9.
INFORM, Six Steps a State Can Take to Promote Waste Reduction, 1988.
10.
42 U.S.C. Sect. 241(b)(4)
11.
Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources; “The Potential Cost-Effectiveness of Hazardous Waste Reduction: The Implementation of Section 39(h) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act.”GinsburgR. and LearnerH., Principal Investigators. Contract EA-80/Project: 88/135. Peer-review Draft, June 1989.
12.
RegnaJ.“Assessing Risks: Making Toxics Acceptable,”Science for the People, May/June 1986. FreundenburgW.“Perceived Risk, Real Risk: Social Science and the Art of Probabilistic Risk Assessment,”Science, 242: 44–49 (1988).
See USERA“land ban” regulations — 51 F.R. (1988) 40588
15.
Wisconsin Hospital Association, et.al. and API v. WI Natural Resources Board. State of Wisconsin Circuit Court, Dane County. Case No. 88 CV 5310
16.
(A.) HighlandJoseph. Perceived Problems in the Application of Risk Assessment Analysis, Columbia journal of Environmental Law, 14 (1989) 593.(B)SilbergeldEllen. Presentation at annual meeting of Environmental Information Exchange in Washington, DC, May 1988.
17.
Environmental Forum, Interview with David Doniger, November/December 1989, page 42.
18.
WagesR.Testimony before the Committee on Government Operations, US House of Representatives, 6 November 1989.
19.
See testimony and briefs of Illinois State Chamber of Commerce in Illinois Pollution Control Board, Docket No. R86-9, 100 W. Randolph, Suite 11-500, Chicago, IL 60601.