This article compares perspectives on access to health care issues in 12 rural counties in the mountain region of North Carolina from three sources: 1) meetings with 38 health providers; 2) a survey of 1059 households; and 3) relevant health and population statistics. The main provider concerns were: 1) transportation to care; 2) dental services; 3) lack of resources for small populations; 4) population-based issues; and 5) negative perceptions about local health care. These concerns were compared to results from the survey and health statistics and similarities and differences among the three sources of information were noted. Comparisons were not made to validate or discredit any of the three sources of information, but rather to provide a rounded picture of access to care problems in a rural area. Results are discussed in terms of their policy implications, such as the degree of congruence between health professionals' perceptions and other information, the need to provide better transportation to care, and the issues of providing care to the elderly and Hispanics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdayL. A.AndersenR., Development of Indices of Access to Medical Care, Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1974.
2.
PenchanskyR.ThomasW. T., The Concept of Access, Definition and Relationship to Consumer Satisfaction, Medical Care, 19, pp. 127–140, 1981.
3.
JosephA. E.PhillipsD. R., Accessibility and Utilization: Geographical Perspectives on Health Care Delivery, Harper & Row, New York, 1984.
4.
ConnorR. A.KralewskiJ. E.HillsonS. D., Measuring Geographic Access to Health Care in Rural Areas, Medical Care Review, 51, pp. 337–375, 1994.
5.
RickettsT. C.SavitzL., Access to Health Services, in Geographic Methods for Health Services Research, RickettsT. C.GeslerW. M.SavitzL.OsborneD. (eds.), University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, pp. 91–119, 1994.
6.
AndersonR. A., A Behavioral Model of Families' Use of Health Services, Center for Health Administration Studies, No. 25, University of Chicago, Chicago, 1968.
7.
PenchanskyR., The Concept of Access: A Definition, unpublished report prepared for the National Health Planning Information Center, Bureau of Health Planning and Resource Development, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington D.C, Contract No. HRA 230-75-0073, 1977.
8.
ZitjhoffP. T.VerheijR.deBakkerD., Urban-Rural Variations in Health and Health Services Utilization: An Annotated Bibliography, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute of Primary Health Care, Utrecht, 1994.
9.
VerheijR. (ed.), Urban-Rural Variations in Health Care, NIVEL, Netherlands Institute of Primary Health Care, Utrecht, 1999.
10.
PlautT.LandisS.TrevorJ., Combining Sociology with Epidemiology: Community-Oriented Primary Care in a Rural Mountain County, Clinical Sociology Review, 9, pp. 87–105, 1991.
11.
PlautT.LandisS.TrevorJ., Enhancing Participatory Research with the Community-Oriented Primary Care Model: A Case Study in Community Mobilization, The American Sociologist, pp. 56–70, Winter 1992.
12.
ArcuryT. A.QuandtS. A.BellR. A.McDonaldJ.VitolinsM., Barriers to Nutritional Well-Being for Rural Elders: Community Experts' Perceptions, The Gerontologist, 38, pp. 490–498, 1998.
13.
DamianoP. C.MamanyE. T.FosterN. S. J.McLeranH. E., Transportation of Rural Elders and Access to Health Care, University of Iowa Policy Center for the Midwest Transportation Center, Iowa, 1994.
14.
Census of Population, 1990, Detailed Housing Characteristics. Part 1, U.S. Summary, Table 13.
15.
Census of Population, 1990, Detailed Housing Characteristics. Part 35, North Carolina, Tables 14, 67.
16.
HighWay Statistics, 1999, Licensed Drivers by Sex and Ratio to Population.
17.
PearsallM., Healthways in a Mountain County, Mountain Life & Work, 36, pp. 7–13, 1960.
18.
American Dental Association, Key Dental Facts, 1998, Chicago, 2000.
19.
Population Estimates for the U.S., Regions, and States by Selected Age Groups, Annual Time Series, July 1, 1990 to July 1, 1999, U.S. Census Bureau, 1999.
20.
Population Estimates for Counties by Age Group: July 1, 1999, North Carolina, U.S. Census Bureau, 1999.
21.
North Carolina Institute of Medicine Task Force on Dental Care Access, Report to the North Carolina General Assembly and to the Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, 1999.
22.
ShannonG. W.DeverG. E. A., Health Care Delivery: Spatial Perspectives, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974.
23.
MeadeM. S.FlorinJ.GeslerW. M., Medical Geography, Guilford Press, New York, 1988.
24.
McMillan and Moss Research, Physicians in Western North Carolina 2000, Mebane, North Carolina, 2001.
25.
CliffordW. B.LilleS. C., Rural Elderly: Their Demographic Characteristics, in Aging in Rural America, BullC. N. (ed.), Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 3–16, 1993.
26.
LonginoC. F.Jr.SmithM. H., The Impact of Elderly Migration on Rural Communities, in Aging in Rural Settings: Life Circumstance & Distinctive Features, CowardR. T.KroutJ. A. (eds.), Springer, New York, pp. 209–226, 1998.
27.
LoweryW., Aging Population Statistics for Western North Carolina, Mountain Health Care, Asheville, North Carolina, 1998.
28.
Census of Population, 1980, General Population Characteristics, Volume 1, part 1, U.S. Summary, Table 98, U.S. Census Bureau.
29.
Census of Population, 1980, General Population Characteristics, Volume 1, part 35, North Carolina, Tables 62, 171, U.S. Census Bureau.
30.
Census of Population, 1990, General Population Characteristics, Volume 1, part 1, U.S. Summary, Tables 3, l4, U.S. Census Bureau.
31.
Census of Population, 1990, General Population CharacteristicsVolume 1, part 35, North Carolina, Table 54, U.S. Census Bureau.
ArcuryT. A.QuandtS. A.AustinC. K.PreisserJ.CabreraL. F., Implementation of US-EPA's Worker Protection Standard Training for Agricultural Laborers: An Evaluation Using North Carolina Data, Public Health Reports, 114, pp. 459–468, 1999.
34.
ArcuryT. A.AustinC. K.QuandtS. A.SaavedraR. M., Enhancing Community Participation in a Public Health Project: Farmworkers and Agricultural Chemicals in North Carolina, Health Education & Behavior, 26, pp. 563–578, 1999.
35.
QuandtS. A.ArcuryT. A.AustinC. K.SaavedraR. M., Farmworker and Farmer Perceptions of Farmworker Agricultural Chemical Exposure in North Carolina, Human Organization, 57, pp. 359–368, 1998.
36.
Census of Population, 1980, Population Characteristics, Volume 1, part 1, U.S. Summary, Table 74, U.S. Census Bureau.
37.
Census of Population, 1990, Population Characteristics, Volume 1, part 1, U.S. Summary, Table 3, U.S. Census Bureau.
38.
Census of Population, 1980, Population Characteristics, Volume 1, part 35, North Carolina, Table 59, U.S. Census Bureau.
39.
Census of Population, 1990, Population Characteristics, Volume 1, part 35, North Carolina, Tables 54, 79, U.S. Census Bureau.
40.
RowlesG. D., Changing Health Culture in Rural Appalachia: Implications for Serving the Elderly, Journal of Aging Studies, 5, pp. 375–389, 1991.
41.
EllerR. D., The Role of Academic Medical Centers in Appalachia, Appalachian Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, 1993.
42.
BurkettG. L., The Status of Health in Appalachia, in Sowing Seeds in the Mountains: Community-Based Coalitions for Cancer Prevention and Control, CoutoR. A.SimpsonN. K.HarrisG. (eds.), National Cancer Institute, Washington, D.C., NIH Publication No. 94-3779, pp. 43–60, 1994.
