The study was aimed at characterizing the exact algebraic structure of the love schema in order to trace possible changes in the conceptualization of love throughout the adult life cycle, notably as regards the weight attributed to the three components of love: passion, intimacy, and commitment. The methodological framework was the Functional Theory of Cognition. Irrespective of the gender and age of the participants (from 18 to 93), the structure of the love schema was shown to obey an equal-weight-averaging rule; the love schema was conceived as a strictly compensatory schema. Irrespective of age and gender, passion was the most important factor (w = .51), followed by intimacy (.29) and commitment (.20). The relationship between overall love value and degree of passion (or intimacy or commitment) was not conceived as a linear one, but as an exponential one. The weight of passion was shown to decline over age, and the weight of commitment was shown to increase over age. This change was, however, very limited and observed in elderly participants only.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckerM., & DavisM. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 21–50.
2.
AndersonN. H. (1981). Methods of information integration theory.New York: Academic Press.
3.
AndersonN. H. (1991). Contributions to information integration theory.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
AndersonN. H. (1996). A functional theory of cognition.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
AronE. N., & AronA. (1997). Extremities of love: The sudden sacrifice of career, family dignity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 200–212.
6.
AronA., & WestbayL. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535–551.
7.
ButlerR.WalkerW. R.SkowronskiJ. J., & ShannonL. (1995). Age and responses to the love attitudes scale: Consistence in structure, differences in scores. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 40, 281–296.
8.
DionK. L., & DionK. K. (1973). Correlates of romantic love. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4, 51–56.
9.
FarkasA. J. (1991). Cognitive algebra of interpersonal relationship. In AndersonN. H., Contributions to information integration theory (Vol. II, pp. 43–99). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
FehrB. (1999). Lay people's conceptions of commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 90–103.
11.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG., & GilesL. (1999). Ideals of intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72–89.
12.
FreudS. (1952). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In The major works of Sigmund Freud (pp. 664–696). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britanica.
13.
GirardM.MulletE., & CallahanS. (2002). Mathematics of forgiveness. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 351–375.
14.
GuilletL.HermandD., & MulletE. (2002). Cognitive processes involved in the appraisal of stress. Stress and Health, 18, 91–102.
15.
JacobsJ. (1992). Facilitators of romantic attraction and their relation to love-style. Social Behavior and Personality, 20, 227–233.
16.
Karpowicz LazregC., & MulletE. (2001). Judging the pleasantness of form-color combinations. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 511–533.
17.
LemieuxR., & HaleJ. L. (1999). Intimacy, passion, and commitment in young romantic relationships: Successfully measuring the triangular theory of love. Psychological Reports, 85, 497–503.
18.
MarstonP. J.HechtM. L.MankeM. L.McDanielS., & ReederH. (1998). The subjective experience of intimacy, passion, and commitment in heterosexual loving relationships. Personal Relationships, 5, 15–30.
19.
MeeksB. S.HendrickS. S., & HendrickC. (1998). Communication, love and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 755–773.
20.
MeyersS. A., & BersheidE. (1997). The language of love: The difference a preposition makes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 347–362.
21.
MursteinB. I. (1988). A taxonomy of love. In SternbergR. J. & BarnesM. L. (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 13–37). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
NetoF., & MulletE. (1998). Decision making as regards migration: Wage differential, job opportunities and the network effect. Acta Psychologica, 98, 57–66.
23.
PeeleS., & BrodskyA. (1976). Love and addiction.New York: New American Library.
24.
ReederH. M. (1996). The subjective experience of love through the adult life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 43, 325–340.
25.
ReedyM.BirrenJ., & ShaieK. (1981). Age and sex differences in satisfying love relationships across the adult life span. Human Development, 24, 56–66.
26.
ReganP. C. (1998). Of lust and love: Beliefs about the role of sexual desire in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 5, 139–157.
27.
RubinZ. (1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265–273.
28.
ShanteauJ. C., & NagyG. F. (1979). Probability of acceptance in dating choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 522–533.
29.
SternbergR. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.
30.
SternbergR. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313–335.
31.
SternbergR. J., & GrajekS. (1984). The nature of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 345–356.
32.
TennovD. (1979). Love and limerance.New York: Stein & Day.
33.
TuckerP., & AronA. (1993). Passionate love and marital satisfaction at key transition points in the family cycle. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 135–147.
34.
WalsterE., & WalsterG. W. (1978). A new look at love.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
35.
ZalinskiJ., & AndersonN. H. (1986). AVERAGE: A user-friendly FORTRAN-77 program for parameter estimation for the averaging model of information integration theory. La Jolla, CA: Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego.
36.
ZalinskiJ., & AndersonN. H. (1991). Parameter estimation for averaging theory. In AndersonN. H. (Ed.), Contributions to Information Integration Theory (Vol. I, pp. 353–394). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
