For a quarter of a century the Federal Government and the nuclear industry have deliberately deceived the American public about the risks of nuclear power. Facts have been systematically withheld, distorted, and obscured, and calculations have been deliberately biased in order to present nuclear power in an unrealistically favorable light.
Most persistent and flagrant have been: (a) attempts to “normalize” public perception of nuclear accident casualties with those of more familiar accidents by emphasizing only acute fatalities and ignoring or downplaying the major effects of nuclear accidents, namely, health impairment and death years delayed; and (b) the cloaking of the objectively undocumentable faith of the atomic energy establishment that a nuclear accident is extremely unlikely in a smokescreen of invalid, pseudo-quantitative statistical probabilities in order to convince the public that the chance of an accident is negligible. Prime examples of these abuses are found in the Rasmussen report on nuclear reactor safety and in its representation to the public.
The deceptive practices used in promoting nuclear power have seriously shaken public faith in government, technology, and science. The scientific community has a special responsibility to minimize such future political abuses of science. For those who were responsible for the deliberate breeches of public trust which resulted in this loss of faith, mere professional disdain will not suffice. They should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GreenH. P.Testimony presented at hearings of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session. Nuclear Powerplant Siting and Licensing, Vol. 1, Part 1, pp. 57–76, 1974.
2.
GreenH. P.The Price-Anderson Act. Testimony presented at State of Pennsylvania Insurance Commission Hearings, August 1973. Cited in FordD. F.KendallH. W., Nuclear misinformation. Environment17(5): 17–27, 1975.
3.
KistiakowskyG. B.America's ‘arrogant’ nuclear bureaucracy. New York Times, April 5, 1979.
4.
Theoretical Possibilities and Consequences of Major Accidents in Large Nuclear Power Plants (WASH-740). U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C., March 1957.
5.
RayD. L.Testimony presented at hearings of the joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 93rd Congress, 1st Session. Nuclear Reactor Safety, Part 1, Phases I and IIa, pp. 63–95, September 25, 1975.
6.
KoutsH. J. C.The Brookhaven Report. Atomic Industrial Forum Public Affairs and Information Program Background Info reprint of speech given before a Forum conference on February 8–11, 1970.
7.
Documents relevant to the Brookhaven National Laboratory Revision of WASH-740, released as attachments to U.S. Atomic Energy Commission press release No. R-252, in response to a request under the Freedom of Information Act by Myron M. Cherry on behalf of David Comey, June 25, 1973.
8.
The Risks of Nuclear Power Reactors: A Review of the NRC Reactor Safety Study WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/014). Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, Mass., August 1977.
9.
Preliminary Review of the AEC Reactor Safety Study. Joint Review Committee, Sierra Club—Union of Concerned Scientists, San Francisco—Cambridge, Mass., December 1974.
10.
Population density around nuclear power plant sites. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission staff memorandum report, April 23, 1973.
11.
General Environmental Siting Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants: Topics and Bases. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C., October 31, 1973.
12.
Task Force Report: Study of the Reactor Licensing Process. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C., October 1973 (mimeographed).
13.
Study of Quality Verification and Budget Impact. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C., January 1974.
14.
PollardR., editor. The Nugget File. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, Mass., 1979.
15.
WelchB. L.Let the dinosaur die. Chemtech, pp. 282–288, May 1977.
16.
WelchB. L.Nuclear energy on the dole. Nation, pp. 231–235, February 26, 1977.
17.
WelchB.L. Solar energy development. Science192: 1060–1062, 1976.
18.
Report of the Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group: Nuclear Power Issues and Choices. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Mass., 1977.
19.
WelchB. L., The reality of solar power. Nation, pp. 44–48, January 21, 1978.
20.
Reactor Safety Study: An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (NUREG-75/014; WASH-1400). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., October 1975.
21.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issues Policy Statement on Reactor Safety Study and Review by Lewis Panel. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission press release No. 79-19, January 19, 1979.
22.
Risk Assessment Review Group Report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NUREG/CR-0400). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., September 1978.
23.
Reactor Safety: Independence of Rasmussen Study Doubted. Science197: 29, 1977.
24.
WelchB. L.Testimony presented at hearings of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session. Nuclear Reactor Safety, Part 2, Vol. 2, pp. 751–752, January 24, 1974.
25.
RayD. L.Testimony presented at hearings of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session. Possible Modification or Extension of the Price-Anderson Insurance and Indemnity Act, Phase 1: Review, pp. 8–42, January 31, 1974.
26.
RasmussenN. C.Testimony presented at hearings of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session. Possible Modification or Extension of the Price-Anderson Insurance and Indemnity Act, Phase 1: Review, pp. 638–654, May 16, 1974.
27.
RayD. L.Testimony presented at hearings of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session. Nuclear Reactor Safety, Part 2, Vol. 1, pp. 46–53, January 22, 1974.
28.
WelchB. L.Testimony presented at hearings of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session. Possible Modification or Extension of the Price-Anderson Insurance and Indemnity Act, Phase I: Review, pp. 267–312, March 28, 1974.
29.
Report to the APS [American Physical Society] by the Study Group on Light Water Reactor Safety. Reviews of Modern Physics47 (Sup. 1): 29, Summer 1975.
30.
UdallM.Letter to Speaker of the House Carl Albert, November 26, 1975. Reprinted in hearings of the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment of U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Oversight Hearings on Nuclear Energy—The Price-Anderson Nuclear Indemnity Act, pp. 148–153, December 1, 1975.
31.
PasternackB.Letter to James E. McLaughlin, Director, Radiation Physics Division, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, July 8, 1964.
32.
Risks to Public From Nuclear Power Plants Very Small, Study Concludes. U.S. Atomic Energy Commission press release No. T-410, August 20, 1974.
33.
Nuclear safety: Calculating the odds of disaster. Science185: 838, 1974.
34.
RasmussenN. L.Testimony presented at hearings of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, 93rd Congress, 1st Session. Nuclear Reactor Safety, Part 1, Phases I and IIa, pp. 124–148, September 25, 1973.
35.
McBrideJ. P.Radiological impact of airborne effluents of coal and nuclear plants. Science202: 1045–1050, 1978.
36.
Risks Associated with Nuclear Power: A Critical Review of the Literature. Committee on Science and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1969.
37.
Radioactive peril doubted in 1958 Los Angeles cloud. New York Times, March 9, 1979.
38.
Fallout confusion laid to Eisenhower. New York Times, p. 1, April 20, 1979.
39.
JohnsonG.Micronesia: America's strategic trust. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists35 (2): 10–15, 1979.
40.
WebbR. E.The Accident Hazards of Nuclear Power Plants, pp. 183–186. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, 1976.
41.
BEIR-III. Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1979.
42.
YellinJ.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Reactor Safety Study. Bell Journal of Economics7: 317, 1976.
43.
RasmussenN. C.Testimony presented at oversight hearings on the Risk Assessment Review, Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, U.S. House of Representatives, 98th Congress, 2nd Session, February 26, 1979, pp. 34–45, 129–141.
44.
Meteorites and nuclear power. Science203: 528, 1979.
45.
von HippelF.Looking back at the Rasmussen Report. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, p. 42, February 1977.
