Humanizing Nursing Home Environments: The Relevance of Hospice Principles

Abstract

At the heart of the rapidly growing American hospice movement is a philosophy of care that emphasizes patient individuality and responsiveness to total needs of the dying and their families. To date, the response to this model of terminal care has been favorable. The hospice is viewed as a humanizing mode of health care with a capacity to enhance the quality of life experienced by persons defined as terminal. Data gleaned from participant observation in an American hospice program by one of the authors supports this view. The hospice has the potential to provide a social context for humane, personalized death in which maximum effort can be made to control pain in all its forms: physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. Sociological literature has been much harsher in its assessment of the quality of life in nursing homes. Such discussions frequently include references to nursing home environments as fostering loss of autonomy and social death. This paper suggests that the hospice approach to care of the dying includes several elements that can be utilized to improve the quality of life in nursing homes: a total needs emphasis, increased patient autonomy, open discussion of death, a community ideology, a team orientation that cuts across levels of staff hierarchy, a role blurring of caregivers, focus on patients and families as the unit of care, and mutually beneficial integration of hospice with the outside community. There are, however, crucial differences between a hospice and a nursing home which may hamper direct transference of humanizing hospice principles, e.g., hospice patients are defined as terminal; staff, thus, can be motivated to put forth their best because of perceived time limits. There are also important differences in the characteristics of patient populations, length of stay, economic constraints, ability to attract volunteers, and emphasis on task-orientation. The time has come to apply increased ingenuity to adapting humanizing hospice principles to the care of elderly in nursing homes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Goffman

, Asylums, Anchor Books, Garden City, New York, 1961.

Coser

R. L.

, Alienation and the Social Structure, Friedson

, (ed.), The Hospital in Modern Society, Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1963.

Glaser

and Strauss

, Awareness of Dying, Aldine, Chicago, 1965.

Glaser

and Strauss

, Time for Dying, Aldine, Chicago, 1968.

Sudnow

, Passing On: The Social Organization of Dying, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1967.

Stoddard

, The Hospice Movement: A Better Way of Caring for the Dying, Stein and Day, New York, 1978.

Stannard

C. I.

, Old Folks and Dirty Work: The Social Conditions for Patient Abuse in a Nursing Home, Social Problems, 20, pp. 329–342, 1973.

Gubrium

J. F.

, Living and Dying at Murray Manor, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1975.

Feldman

Burke

R. E.

, and Schwarzmann

, Analysis of the Training of Unlicensed Long-Term Care Personnel, Journal of Long-Term Care Administration, 6, pp. 1–12, 1978.

10.

Townsend

, The Last Refuge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1964.

11.

Coe

, Self-Conception and Institutionalization, Rose

and Peterson

, (eds.), in Older People and Their Social World, F. A. Davis, Philadelphia, 1965.

12.

Bennett

and Nahemow

, Institutional Totality and Criteria of Social Adjustment in Residences for the Aged, Journal of Social Issues, 21, pp. 44–76, 1965.

13.

Posner

, Notes on the Negative Implications of Being Competent in a Home for the Aged, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 5, pp. 357–364, 1974.

14.

Tobin

S. S.

and Lieberman

M. A.

, Last Home for the Aged, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1976.

15.

Riley

and Foner

, Aging and Society: Volume 1: An Inventory of Research Findings, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1968.

16.

Townsend

, Old Age: The Last Segregation, Bantam, New York, 1971.

17.

Butler

R. N.

, Why Survive? Being Old in America, Harper and Row, New York, 1975.

18.

Mendelson

M. A.

, Tender Loving Greed, Knopf, New York, 1974.

19.

Fontana

, Ripping off the Elderly: Inside the Nursing Home, Johnson

J. M.

and Douglas

J. D.

, (eds.), in Crime at the Top: Deviance in Business and the Professions, J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1978.

20.

Kart

C. S.

and Manard

B. B.

, Quality of Care in Old Age Institutions, Gerontologist, 13, pp. 282–288, 1973.

21.

Kosberg

, Differences in Proprietary Institutions Carying for Affluent and Non-Affluent Elderly, Gerontologist, 13, pp. 299–304, 1973.

22.

Tobin

S.S.

, How Nursing Homes Vary, Gerontologist, 14, pp. 516–519, 1974.

23.

Brody

E. M.

, Long-Term Care of the Aged: Promises and Prospects, Health and Social Work, 4, pp. 30–59, 1979.

24.

Brody

E. M.

, Long-Term Care of Older People, Human Sciences Press, New York, 1977.

25.

Howard

, Humanization and Dehumanization of Health Care: A Conceptual View, Howard

and Strauss

, (eds.), in Humanizing Health Care, John Wiley, New York, 1975.

26.

Kahana

, The Humane Treatment of Old People in Institutions, Gerontologist, 13, pp. 282–288, 1973.

27.

Saunders

C. M.

, The Management of Terminal Disease, Edward Arnold, London, 1978.

28.

Saunders

C. M.

, Care of the Dying, 2nd edition, Macmillan Journal, London, 1976.

29.

Munley

, Death Returns from Exile: A Hospice Experience, unpublished dissertation, Boston College, 1980.

30.

Kastenbaum

and Candy

S.E.

, The 4 Per Cent Fallacy: A Methodological and Empirical Critique of Extended Care Facility Population Statistics, International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 4, pp. 15–21, 1973.

31.

Kohn

, Hospice Movement Provides Humane Alternative for Terminally Ill Patients, Modern Healthcare, 6, pp. 26–28, September, 1976.

32.

Liegner

L. M.

, St. Christopher's Hospice, 1974: Care for the Dying Patient, Journal of the American Medical Association, 234, pp. 1047–1048, 1975.

33.

Moss

F. E.

and Halamandaris

V. J.

, Too Old, Too Sick, Too Bad: Nursing Homes in America, Aspen Systems, Germantown, Maryland, 1977.

34.

Howard , 1977.

35.

Heifetz

M. D.

and Mangel

, The Right to Die, G.P. Putnam, New York, 1975.

36.

United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Long-Term Care Facility Improvement Study, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1975.

37.

Plant

, Finding a Home for Hospice Care in the United States, Journal of the American Hospital Association, 51, pp. 53–62, 1977.

38.

Gustafson

, Dying: The Career of the Nursing Home Patient, Kart

C. S.

and Manard

B. B.

, (eds), in Aging in America, Alfred, New York, 1976.

39.

Barney

J. L.

, The Prerogative of Choice in Long-Term Care, Gerontologist, 17, pp. 309–314, 1977.

40.

Williamson

J. B.

Evans

, and Munley

, Aging and Society, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1980.

41.

Illich

, Medical Nemesis, Bantam, New York, 1976.

42.

Henry

, Culture Against Man, Random House, New York, 1963.

43.

Mercer

and Kane

R. A.

, Helplessness and Hopelessness Among the Institutionalized Aged: An Experiment, Health and Social Work, 4, pp. 90–115, 1979.

44.

Langer

and Rodin

, The Effects of Choice and Enhanced Personal Responsibility for the Aged: A Field Experiment in an Institutional Setting, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, pp. 191–198, 1976.

45.

United States Senate Special Committee on Aging, What Can Be Done in Nursing Homes: Positive Aspects in Long-Term Care, supporting paper no. 6, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1975.

46.

California Department of Health, Health News, 2, pp. 1–11, June, 1975.

47.

Hirsch

C. S.

, Integrating the Nursing Home Resident into a Senior Citizens Center, Gerontologist, 17, pp. 227–234, 1977.

48.

Kosberg

, Making Institutions Accountable: Research and Policy Issues, Gerontologist, 14, pp. 510–515, 1974.

49.

St. Christopher's Hospice, Annual Report, 1977–1978, St. Christopher's Hospice, London, 1978.