How might nations cooperate to improve the health of their most vulnerable peoples? There is, presently, no coherent political, social, or ethical framework to answer this question. What progress there is remains piecemeal. Despite a long-term strategy to 2015 enshrining health as part of the process of human development—the Millennium Development Goals—existing institutions are struggling to meet these challenges. The WHO is underfunded and its work in countries is weak. The World Bank is rich but remains unable to free itself from a neoliberal Washington consensus. New institutions—such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria—distort efforts to build a coordinated international strategy for global health. And major policy initiatives (e.g., the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health) lack political commitment to invest in health. In this article, the author traces the beginnings of an answer to the question of what might constitute a political (specifically, foreign policy) approach to improving the health of peoples. A normative model for defining a just health system is urgently required. The author uses the framework of international relations provided by John Rawls to devise a series of policy principles for the health of peoples.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SiringiS., Tanzania loses Global Fund money because of internal wrangling. Lancet360: 1848, 2002.
2.
3.
4.
National Sentinel Surveillance System.Poverty Reduction Strategy Indicators Produced Using NSS/AMMP Data for 1998–2000. Working paper No. 2. November 2001.
5.
National Sentinel Surveillance System.Setting Priorities in Health Care: Use of Diverse Information Perspectives at the District Level in Tanzania. Working paper No. 4. October 2002.
6.
Ministry of Health, United Republic of Tanzania.National Mortality Burden Estimates for 2001. 2002.
World Health Organization.The World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva, 2000.
9.
Why rank countries by health performance? (editorial). Lancet357: 1633, 2001.
10.
KleczkowskiB. M.RoemerM. I., and Van Der WerffA.National Health Systems and Their Reorientation towards Health for All. Public Health Papers, No. 77. WHO, Geneva, 1984.
11.
RoemerM. I.National Health Systems of the World, 2 vols. Oxford University Press, New York, 1991.
12.
EllingR. H., Theory and method for the cross-national study of health systems. Int. J. Health Serv. 24: 285–309, 1994.
13.
TerrisM., The three world systems of medical care: Trends and prospects. Am. J. Public Health68: 1125–1131, 1978.
14.
De MiguelJ. M., A framework for the study of national health systems. Inquiry12(2 Suppl.): 10–24, 1975.
15.
NavarroV., Assessment of the World Health Report 2000. Lancet356: 1598–1601, 2000.
16.
AlmeidaC., Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000. Lancet357: 1692–1697, 2001.
17.
BravemanP.StarfieldB., and GeigerM. J., World Health Report 2000: How it removes equity from the agenda for public health monitoring and policy. BMJ323: 678–681, 2001.
18.
YameyG., Interview with Gro Brundtland. BMJ325: 1355–1361, 2002.
19.
ShawR. P., World Health Report 2000 “financial fairness indicator”: Useful compass or crystal ball?Int. J. Health Serv. 32: 195–203, 2002.
20.
WagstaffA., Reflections on and alternatives to WHO's fairness of financial contribution index. Health Econ. 11: 103–115, 2002.
21.
DanielsN.Bull. WHO.78: 740–750, 2000.
22.
CaplanR. L.LightD. W., and DanielsN., Benchmarks of fairness: A moral framework for assessing equity. Int. J. Health Serv. 29: 853–869, 1999.
23.
HowardM.The Invention of Peace. Profile, London, 2001.
24.
BobbittP.The Shield of Achilles. Allen Lane, London, 2002.
25.
BobbittP.The Archbishop is right: The nation-state is dying. Times (London), December 27, 2002.
26.
GuehennoJ.-M.The End of the Nation-State. University of Minnesota Press, London, 2000.
27.
CooperR.The Postmodern State and the World Order. Demos, London, 1998.
28.
PollockA. M., and PriceD., Rewriting the regulations: How the World Trade Organisation could accelerate privatization in health-care systems. Lancet356: 1195–2000, 2000.
29.
MannJ., Health and human rights: Broadening the agenda for health professionals. Health Hum. Rights.2: 1–5, 1996.
30.
A world war against terrorism (editorial).Lancet358: 937–938, 2001.
31.
Bioterrorism: Safeguarding the public's health (editorial).Lancet358: 1283, 2001.
32.
HoggR., Time to act: Global apathy towards HIV/AIDS is a crime against humanity. Lancet360: 1710–1711, 2002.
33.
United Nations.Human Development Report 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World. Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
34.
NavarroV., and ShiL., The political context of social inequalities and health. Soc. Sci. Med.52: 481–491, 2001.
35.
FrenkJ., and Gomez-DantesO., Globalisation and the challenges to health systems. BMJ325: 95–97, 2002.
36.
MurrayC. J. L., and FrenkJ., A framework for assessing the performance of health systems. Bull. WHO.78: 717–731, 2000.
37.
SaltmanR. B., and Ferroussier-DavisO., The concept of stewardship in health policy. Bull. WHO.78: 732–739, 2000.
38.
BryantJ. M., Principles of justice as a basis for conceptualizing a health care system. Int. J. Health Serv. 7: 707–719, 1977.
39.
RawlsJ.The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
40.
WatsonR.‘Big Bang' to reunite Europe in 25-state nation. Times (London), December 12, 2002.
41.
SpiersR. I.The United States was admired and respected. Int. Herald Tribune, December 13, 2002.
42.
RawlsJ.A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971.
43.
RawlsJ.The Law of Peoples. In Collected Papers ed. FreemanS., pp. 529–564. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
44.
RawlsJ.Distributive Justice: Some addenda. In Collected Papers, ed. FreemanS., pp. 154–175. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
45.
WaltG., and GilsonL., Reforming the health sector in developing countries: The central role of policy analysis. Health Pol. Planning.9: 353–370, 1994.
46.
HillC.The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Palgrave, London, 2003.
47.
United Nations Development Program.Arab Human Development Report 2002. New York, 2002.
48.
BuseK., and WaltG., Aid coordination for health sector reform: A conceptual framework for analysis and assessment. Health Policy38: 173–187, 1996.
49.
WaltG., Health sector development: From aid coordination to resource management. Health Pol. Planning.14: 207–218, 1999.
50.
HaassR. N.The goal becomes Muslim democracy. Int. Herald Tribune, December 11, 2002.
51.
DwyerJ., The ideal health minister. J. Epidemiol. Community Health56: 888–895, 2002.
52.
HortonR., North and South: Bridging the information gap. Lancet355: 2231–2236, 2000.
53.
ObuayaC.-C., Reporting of research and health issues relevant to resource-poor countries in high-impact medical journals. Eur. Sci. Editing.28: 72–77, 2002.
54.
MoskopJ. C., Rawlsian justice and a human right to health care. J. Med. Philos.8: 329–338, 1983.
55.
SenA.Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.
56.
Commission on Macroeconomics and Health.Macroeconomics and Health: Investing in Health for Economic Development. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2002.
57.
ReinertsenJ. L., Physicians as leaders in the improvement of health care systems. Ann. Intern. Med.128: 833–838, 1998.
